Improvement in flow-sheet of extraction chromatography for trivalent minor actinides recovery

Abstract

Extraction chromatography flow-sheet employing octyl(phenyl)-N,N-diisobutylcarbonoylmethylphosphine oxide and bis(2-ethylhexyl) hydrogen phosphate extractants for trivalent minor actinide recovery was modified to improve column separation performance. Excellent trivalent minor actinides recovery performance was obtained by column separation experiments on nitric acid solution containing the trivalent minor actinides and representative fission product elements, i.e. recovery yields > 93% with sufficient decontamination factors against the fission products. Those are the best performance which we have ever obtained by experiments inside hot cell.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. 1.

    International Atomic Energy Agency (2004) Technical reports series no. 435; implications of partitioning and transmutation in radioactive waste management. IAEA, Vienna

  2. 2.

    Funasaka H, Itoh M, Proceedings of Global 2007, September 9–13, 2007, Boise, Idaho, USA (2007)

  3. 3.

    Nakahara M, Sano Y, Koma Y, Kamiya M, Shibata A, Koizumi T, Koyama T (2007) Separation of actinide elements by solvent extraction using centrifugal contactors in the NEXT process. J Nucl Sci Technol 44(3):373–381

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Koma Y, Sano Y, Nomura K, Watanabe S, Matsumura T, Morita Y (2010) Development of the extraction chromatography system for separation of americium and curium. In: Proceedings of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency 11th information exchange meeting on actinide and fission product partitioning and transmutation, San Francisco, USA, November 1–4, 2010, IV-4, OECD/NEA

  5. 5.

    Watanabe S, Arai T, Ogawa T, Takizawa M, Sano K, Nomura K, Koma Y (2012) Optimization composition of TODGA/SiO2-P adsorbent for extraction chromaotgraphy process. Proc Chem 7:411–417

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Watanabe S, Sano Y, Shiwaku H, Yaita T, Ohno S, Arai T, Matsuura H, Koka M, Satoh T (2017) Local structure and distribution of remaining elements inside extraction chromatography adsorbents. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 404:202–206

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sano Y, Watanabe S, Matsuura H, Nagoshi K, Arai T (2017) Microanalysis of silica-based adsorbent for effective recovery of radioactive elements. J Nucl Sci Technol 54(10):1058–1064

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Watanabe S, Senzaki T, Shibata A, Nomura K, Koma Y, Nakajima Y (2011) MA recovery experiments from genuine HLLW by extraction chromatography. In: Proceedings of global 2011, Makuhari, Japan, December 11–16, 2011, Paper 387433 [CD-ROM]

  9. 9.

    Watanabe S, Nomura K, Kitawaki S, Shibata A, Kofuji H, Sano Y, Takeuchi M (2016) Flow-sheet study of MA recovery by extraction chromatography for SmART cycle project. Proc Chem 21:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Watanabe S, Sano Y, Kofuji H, Takeuchi M, Shibata A, Nomura K (2018) Am, Cm reocvery from genuine HLLW by extraction chromatography. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 316:1113–1117

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Watanabe S, Goto I, Sano Y, Koma Y (2010) Chromatography column system with controlled flow and temperature for engineering scale application. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 132(10):102903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Watanabe S, Goto I, Nomura K, Sano Y, Koma Y (2011) Extraction chromatography experiments on repeated operation using engineering scale column system. Energy Proc 7:449–453

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Watanabe S, Sano Y, Nomura K, Koma Y, Okamoto Y (2015) Safety operation of chromatography column system with discharging hydrogen radiolytically generated. EPJ Nucl Sci Technol 1:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Horwitz EP, Kalina DG, Diamond H, Vandegrift GF, Schulz WW (1985) The TRUEX process—a process for the extraction of the transuranic elements from nitric acid wastes utilizing modified PUREX solvent. Solv Extr Ion Exch 3(1&2):75–109

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Koma Y, Watanabe M, Nemoto S, Tanaka Y (1998) A counter current experiment for the separation of trivalent actinides and lanthanides by the setfics process. Solv Extr Ion Exch 16(6):1357–1367

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Weaver B, Kappelmann FA (1964) TALSPEAK: a new method of separating americium and curium from the lanthanides by extraction from an aqueous solution of an aminopolyacetic acid complex with a monoacidic organophosphate or phosphonate. In: ORNL-3559

  17. 17.

    Savantesson I, Persson G, Hagstrӧm I, Liljenzin JO (1980) Distribution ratios and empirical equations for the extraction of elements in purex high level waste solution-II: HDEHP. J Inorg Nucl Chem 42:1037–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wei Y, Kumagai M, Takashima Y (2000) Studies on the separation of minor actinides from high-level wastes by extraction chromatography using novel silica-based extraction resins. Nucl Technol 132:413

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sou Watanabe.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watanabe, S., Senzaki, T., Shibata, A. et al. Improvement in flow-sheet of extraction chromatography for trivalent minor actinides recovery. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 322, 1273–1277 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06808-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Extraction chromatography
  • Trivalent minor actinides
  • Reprocessing
  • CMPO
  • HDEHP