Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 322, Issue 2, pp 415–422 | Cite as

Performance evaluation of a cylindrical air-lift mixer-settler device and optimization of process parameters for the extraction of uranium (VI) from nitric acid medium

  • S. Rajeswari
  • R. Karunakaran
  • T. Kalaiarasu
  • B. Robert Selvan
  • K. A. VenkatesanEmail author
Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

A customized single-stage cylindrical combined air lift mixer-settler (C-CALMIX) device has been developed and its performance was evaluated by studying the extraction behavior of U(VI) in a solution of 1.1 M tri-n-butyl phosphate (TBP) in n–dodecane (n-DD) from 4 M nitric acid medium, at 298 K. The extraction of U(VI) was studied as a function of process parameters of the C-CALMIX such as flow-rate of organic and aqueous phases, ratio of organic to aqueous flow-rates, air flow-rate etc., that are amenable for variation. The distribution ratio of U(VI) obtained under dynamic conditions in a C-CALMIX was compared with those obtained in a batch equilibrium mode. The process parameters were optimized to obtain high distribution ratio of U(VI) in C-CALMIX, comparable to that obtained at batch equilibrium mode without compromising the throughput of C-CALMIX. The stripping behavior of U(VI) from the loaded organic phase was studied using 0.01 M nitric acid. The results are reported in this paper.

Keywords

Solvent extraction Uranium Tri-n-butyl phosphate Air lift mixer-Settler Recovery 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Ritcey GM, Ashbrook AW (1979) Solvent extraction: principles and applications to process metallurgy: Part II, 1st edn. Elsevier Scientific Publishing, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cox M (2004) Solvent extraction in hydrometallurgy. In: Rydberg J, Cox M, Musikas C, Choppin GR (eds) Solvent extraction principles and practice, 2nd edn. Marcel Deker, New York, NY, pp 455–505Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kumar S, Mudali UK (2013) Modeling of Pu(VI) distribution coefficients in 30% TBP based PUREX process. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 295(3):1951–1955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duan W, Zhao M, Wang C, Cao S (2014) Recent advances in the development and application of annular centrifugal contactors in the nuclear industry. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 32(1):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paiva AP, Malik P (2004) Recent advances on the chemistry of solvent extraction applied to the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuels and radioactive wastes. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 261(2):485–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poczynajło A (1988) Studies on reductive back extraction of plutonium in PUREX process. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 125(2):445–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leonard RA (1988) Recent advances in centrifugal contactor design. Sep Sci Technol 23(12–13):1473–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meikrantz DH, Meikrantz SB, Macaluso LL (2001) Annular centrifugal contactors for multiple stage extraction processes. Chem Eng Commun 188(1):115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pandey NK, Augustine E, Murali R, Desigan N, Kamachi Mudali U, Joshi JB (2016) Kinetics of extraction of nitric acid into binary mixture of tri-n-butyl phosphate and normal paraffin hydrocarbon. Chem Eng Res Des 111:492–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lade VG, Rathod VK, Bhattacharyya S, Manohar S, Wattal PK (2013) Comparison of normal phase operation and phase reversal studies in a pulsed sieve plate extraction column. Chem Eng Res Des 91(6):1133–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kadam BD, Joshi JB, Koganti SB, Patil RN (2008) Hydrodynamic and mass transfer characteristics of annular centrifugal extractors. Chem Eng Res Des 86(3):233–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pinto GA, Gomes EF, Durao FO, Madureira CMN, Guimaraes MMBL, Morais S (2009) Multi-criteria design optimization study of solvent extraction in mixer–settler units. Hydrometallurgy 98(3–4):224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roussel H, Charton S (2016) Design development and testing of miniature liquid-liquid extraction contactors for R&D studies in nuclear environment. Procedia Chem 21:487–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lade VG, Wankhede PC, Rathod VK (2015) Removal of tributyl phosphate from aqueous stream in a pilot scale combined air-lift mixer-settler unit: process intensification studies. Chem Eng Proces Proc Intensif 95:72–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pinto GA, Durao FO, Fiúza AMA, Guimaraes MMBL, Madureira CMN (2004) Design optimisation study of solvent extraction: chemical reaction, mass transfer and mixer–settler hydrodynamics. Hydrometallurgy 74(1–2):131–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Asadollahzadeh M, Mostaedi MT, Shahhosseini S, Ghaemi A (2016) Experimental investigation of dispersed phase holdup and flooding characteristics in a multistage column extractor. Chem Eng Res Des 105:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sadek KZ, Kandil HA, Warda HA, Ahmed WH (2009) Air-lift pumps characteristics under two-phase flow conditions. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 30(1):88–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaimal CKK, Shah BV, Siddiqui IA, Kumar SV (1989) CALMIX–innovative mixer-settler system. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on uranium technology held at Bombay during 13–15Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koganthi SB, Rajagopalan CV, Periasamy K, Sreedharan V, Balasubramanian GR (1993) Solvent extraction in process industries: development of high efficiency air pulsed ejector mixer settler. In: Proceedings of the international solvent extraction conference (ISEC’93), vol 1, pp 103–110Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Savvin SB (1961) Analytical use of Arsenazo (III): determination of thorium, zirconium, uranium and rare earth elements. Talanta 8(9):673–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ramanujam A (1998) An introduction to the purex process. IANCAS Bull 14:11–20Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sood DD, Patil SK (1996) Chemistry of nuclear fuel reprocessing: current status. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 203(2):547–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Suresh A, Srinivasan TG, Vasudeva Rao PR (1994) Extraction of U(VI), Pu(IV) and Th(IV) by some trialkyl phosphates. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 12(4):727–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fuel Chemistry Division, Materials Chemistry and Metal Fuel CycleIndira Gandhi Centre for Atomic ResearchKalpakkamIndia

Personalised recommendations