Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 322, Issue 2, pp 763–769 | Cite as

Analysis of anomaly characteristics of the soil gas radon from the crossing fault in the mid-east area of Qilian mountain before the 2016 Menyuan Ms6.4 earthquake

  • Chen-hua Li
  • Hui ZhangEmail author
  • He-jun Su
  • Hui-ling Zhou
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Based on the mobile monitoring network of tectonic geochemical in the Mid-East section of Qilian mountain, the precursory anomaly analysis and seismic situation tracking in the seismic hazard area were carried out by monitoring the concentration of soil gas radon crossing fault and combining with the distribution characteristics of seismic activity b value. Results show that the concentration of radon released changed significantly difference in the Mid-East segment of Qilian mountain during 2007–2013, under the background of the regional stress field enhancement, the gas release concentration of Gulang fault significantly decline, implying there is an obvious squeezing and the fault stress accumulation resulting in the decrease of porosity and radon concentration, so we circle a potential over magnitude 6 earthquake hazard fault segment in the future. Subsequently the 2016 Menyuan Ms6.4 earthquake occurred in this hazard zone. Therefore, we believe that soil gas radon can be used as a tracer for regional fault tectonic activities and stress changes, and it is necessary to pay attention to the monitoring of cross-fault soil gas in earthquake precursor observation.

Keywords

Soil gas crossing fault Menyuan Ms6.4 earthquake Mid-East segment of Qilian Hazard area 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the basic R&D fund of the Institute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration (CEA) (Grant 2018IESLZ05), the Gansu province science and technology plan project (Grant 1606RJYA218) and Spark Program of China Earthquake Administration (Grant XH15043). The authors wish to thank the Editor and two reviewers for their fruitful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Dongning L, Jie L, Shumei L et al (2018) Discussion on the seismogenic structure of the 2016 Menyuan Ms6.4 earthquake in Menyuan, Qinghai. Seismol Geol 40(1):107–120Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fang L, Yiqing Z, Yunfeng Z (2019) Frequency characteristics of continuous gravity before the 2016 Menyuan MS6.4 earthquake. China Earthq Eng J 41(2):469–475Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peltzer G, Tapponnier P (1988) Formation and evolution of strike-slip faults, rifts, and basins during the India-Asia Collision: an experimental approach. J Geophys Res 93:15085–15117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tapponnier P, Molnar P (1977) Active faulting and tectonics in China. J Geophys Res 82:2905–2930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zheng WJ, Zhang PZ, He WG, Yuan DY, Shao YX, Zheng DW, Ge WP, Min W (2013) Transformation of displacement between strike-slip and crustal shortening in the northern margin of the Tibetan Plateau: evidence from decadal GPS measurements and late Quaternary slip rates on faults. Tectonophysics 584:267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wen-gui H, Dao-yang Y, Wei-peng G et al (2010) Determination of the slip rate of the Lenglongling fault in the middle and eastern segments of the Qilian Mountain active fault zone. Earthquake 30(1):131–137Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peng G, Zhu-jun H, Yan-fen A et al (2017) Activity of the Lenglongling fault system and seismotectonics of the 2016 MS6.4 Menyuan earthquake. Sci China (Ser D) 60(5):929–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zengjian G, Anning G, Xianghong Z et al (2017) Commemoration of the ninetieth anniversary of the Gulang M S8 earthquake—discussion of the study of great earthquakes. China Earthq Eng J 39(2):191–195Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hejun S, Hui Z, Chenhua L et al (2013) Geochemical features of fault gas on northern margin fault of Xiqinling and its seismic hazard analysis. China Earthq Eng J 35(3):671–676Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li Chenhua S, Hejun ZH et al (2016) Correlation between the spatial distribution of radon anomalies and fault activity in the northern margin of West Qinling Fault Zone, Central China. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 308:679–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou Huiling S, Hejun ZH et al (2018) Mobile monitoring network layout technique for fault gas based on seismogenic mode. China Earthq Eng J 40(5):1052–1060Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang Z, Bo D, Han S et al (2017) Study on the geochemical characteristics of radon in the Jiangsu section of the Tanlu fault zone. China Earthq Eng J 39(2):248–252Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34(4):185–188Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wiemer S, Wyss M (1997) Mapping the frequency-magnitude distribution in asperities: an improved technique to calculate recurrence times? J Geophys Res 102(B7):15115–15128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wyss M, Schorlemmer D, Wiemer S (2000) Mapping asperities by minima of local recurrence time: San Jacinto-Elsinore fault zones. J Geophys Res 105(B4):7829–7844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guixi Y, Xueze W (2007) The application and limitation of multiple seismicity parameters to assessing current faulting behavior and seismic potential of active fault zones. Seismol Geol 29(2):254–271Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiangang F, Changsheng J, Libo H et al (2012) Analysis on the monitoring capability of seismic networks and completeness of earthquake catalogues in Gansu region. Acta Seismol Sin 34(5):646–658Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chen-hua Li
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hui Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • He-jun Su
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hui-ling Zhou
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Earthquake Administration of Gansu ProvinceLanzhouChina
  2. 2.Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, CEALanzhouChina
  3. 3.Institute of GeochemistryChinese Academy of SciencesGuiyangChina

Personalised recommendations