Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 321, Issue 3, pp 985–996 | Cite as

Salvadora Persica branches biomass adsorbent for removal of uranium(VI) and thorium(IV) from aqueous solution: kinetics and thermodynamics study

  • Mazen K. NazalEmail author
  • Mohammad Al-Bayyari
  • Fawwaz I. Khalili
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Adsorption isotherms of U(VI) and Th(IV) in water were obtained and removal kinetics was studied. The main functional groups on the surface of Salvadora Persica branches adsorbent were identified using a Fourier-transform infrared and the surface morphology of adsorbent was characterized by a Scanning Electron Microscope. Effects of the U(VI) and Th(IV) initial concentrations, contact time, the mass of adsorbent loading, pH of the solution were investigated at 25 ± 0.3 °C. The efficiencies with which this adsorbent removes U(VI) and Th(IV) from their solutions in water are reported. The adsorption isotherm fitted the Freundlich model. The adsorption of U(VI) and Th(IV) follows the pseudo-second order kinetic with squared correlation coefficients (R2) close to 1.0. The thermodynamic parameters (i.e. the free energy (\(\Delta G_{\text{ads}}^{o}\)), the enthalpy (\(\Delta H_{\text{ads}}^{o}\)) and the entropy of adsorption (\(\Delta S_{\text{ads}}^{o}\)) for the adsorption of U(VI) and Th(IV) on the Salvadora Persica branches adsorbent were reported.

Keywords

Environment Radioactive elements Adsorption isotherms Removal efficiency Thermodynamic of adsorption 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors highly acknowledge the Center for Environment and Water (CEW) at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) for the support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Majdan M, Pikus S, Gajowiak A, Gładysz-Płaska A, Krzyżanowska H, Żuk J, Bujacka M (2010) Characterization of uranium(VI) sorption by organobentonite. Appl Surf Sci 256(17):5416–5421Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar Amit, Ali Manjoor, Pandey Badri N (2013) Understanding the biological effects of thorium and developing efficient strategies for its decorporation and mitigation. BARC Newsletter 335:55–60Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim JS, Han KS, Kim SJ, Kim S-D, Lee J-Y, Han C, Kumar JR (2016) Synergistic extraction of uranium from Korean black shale ore leach liquors using amine with phosphorous based extractant systems. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307(2):843–854Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bayyari MA, Nazal MK, Khalili FI, Asoudani E (2017) Synergistic effect of tri-n-butyl phosphate (TBP) or tri-n-octyl phosphine oxide (TOPO) with didodecylphosphoric acid (HDDPA) on extraction of uranium(VI) and thorium(IV) ions. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 312(1):133–139Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bayyari MA, Nazal MK, Khalili FI (2010) The effect of ionic strength on the extraction of thorium(IV) from perchlorate solution by didodecylphosphoric acid (HDDPA). Arab J Chem 3(2):115–119Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bayyari MA, Nazal MK, Khalili FI (2010) The effect of ionic strength on the extraction of Thorium(IV) from nitrate solution by didodecylphosphoric acid (HDDPA). J Saudi Chem Soc 14(3):311–315Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anirudhan TS, Rijith S, Tharun AR (2010) Adsorptive removal of thorium(IV) from aqueous solutions using poly(methacrylic acid)-grafted chitosan/bentonite composite matrix: process design and equilibrium studies. Colloids Surf A 368(1–3):13–22Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ioannou K, Hadjiyiannis P, Liatsou I et al (2019) U(VI) adsorption by biochar fiber-MnO2 composites. J Radioannal Nucl Chem 320:425–432.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06479-9 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jie Yu, Luo Xuegang, Liu Bo, Zhou Jian, Feng Jian, Zhu Wenkun, Wang Shanlin, Zhang Yongde, Lina Xiaoyan, Chen Ping (2018) Bayberry tannin immobilized bovine serum albumin nanospheres: characterization, irradiation stability and selective removal of uranyl ions from radioactive wastewater. J Mater Chem A 6:15359–15370Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baybaş D, Ulusoy U (2011) The use of polyacrylamide-aluminosilicate composites for thorium adsorption. Appl Clay Sci 51(1–2):138–146Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khalili F, Al-Banna G (2015) Adsorption of uranium(VI) and thorium(IV) by insolubilized humic acid from Ajloun soil–Jordan. J Environ Radioact 146:16–26Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mahanani Erlina Sih, Samuel Samantha Victoria (2007) MISWAK (Salvadora persica) as a cleansing teeth. Mutiara Medika 7(1):38–42Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ileri O, Cay S, Erduran N (2014) Removal of common heavy metals from aqueous solutions by waste Salvadora persica L. branches (Miswak). Int J Environ 8(4):987–996Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Savvin SB (1961) Analytical use of arsenazo III: determination of thorium, zirconium, uranium and rare earth elements. Talanta 8(9):673–685Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freundlich HMF (1906) Over the adsorption in solution. J Phys Chem 57:385–471Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Langmuir I (1916) The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. J Am Chem Soc 38(11):2221–2295Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Temkin MI, Pyzhev V (1940) Kinetics of ammonia synthesis on promoted iron catalyst. Acta Phys Chim USSR 12:327–356Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dada AO, Olalekan AP, Olatunya AM, Dada O (2012) Langmuir, freundlich, temkin and Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherms studies of equilibrium sorption of Zn2 + unto phosphoric acid modified rice husk. IOSR J Appl Chem 3(1):38–45Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lagergren S (1898) Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption gelöster stoffe Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens. Handlingar 24(4):1–39Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ho YS, McKay G (1998) A comparison of chermosorption kinetic models applied to pollutant removal on various sorbents. Trans IChemE 76:332–340Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bawazeer Tahani M, Alsoufi Mohammad S, Katowah Dina, Alharbi Waad S (2016) Effect of aqueous extracts of Salvadora persica “Miswak” on the acid eroded enamel surface at nano-mechanical scale. Mater Sci Appl 7:754–771Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Halib Nadia, Nuairy Nabilah Bt, Ramli Haslinda, Ahmad Ishak, Othman Norinsan Kamil, Salleh Salihatun Md, Bakarudin Saiful Bahari (2017) Preliminary Assessment of Salvadora persica whitening effects on extracted Stained teeth. J Appl Pharm Sci 7(12):121–125Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang J, Hu X, Liu Y, Xie SB, Bao ZL (2010) Biosorption of uranium(VI) by immobilized Aspergillus fumigatus beads. J Environ Radioactiv 101(6):504Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xia LS, Tan KX, Wang X, Zheng WN (2010) Adsorption behavior of uranium and mechanism analysis on banyan leaves. At Energy Sci Technol 44(3):278Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mahramanlioglu M, Bicer IO, Misirli T, Kilislioglu A (2007) Removal of uranium by the adsorbents produced from coffee residues. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 273:621–624Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang HB, Tan N, Wu FJ, Liu HJ, Sun M, She ZG, Lin YC (2012) Biosorption of uranium(VI) by a mangrove endophytic fungus Fusarium sp. #ZZF51 from the South China Sea. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 292:1011–1016Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Šabanović Elma, Muhić-Šarac Tidža, Nuhanović Mirza, Memić Mustafa (2019) Biosorption of uranium(VI) from aqueous solution by citrus limon peels: kinetics, equlibrium and batch studies. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 319:425–435.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6358-3 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nie X, Dong F, Liu M, Sun S, Yang G, Zhang W, Qin Y, Ma J, Huang R, Gong J (2016) Removel of uranium from aqueous solutions by spirodela punctata as the mechanism of biomineralization. Procedia Environ Sci 31:382Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang Z, Yi FC, Feng Y (2015) Adsorption behavior and mechanism of uranium on wood fiber. At Energy Sci Technol 49:263–272Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sunilkumar B, Chakrapani G (2014) Studies on sorption of uranium on chitin: a solid-state extractant application for removal of uranium from ground water. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 302:1489–1493Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ding D, Xin X, Li L, Hu N, Li G, Wang Y, Fu P (2014) Removal and recovery of U(VI) from low concentration radioactive wastewater by ethylenediamine-modified biomass of Aspergillus niger. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:2206–2222Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yang H, Luo X, Ding H, Zhang X (2019) Adsorption of U(VI) by Elodea nuttallii: equilibrium, kinetic and mechanism analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 319:227–235Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    BoveiriMonji A, Ghoulipour V, Mallah MH, Maraghe-Mianji B (2015) Selective sorption of thorium(IV) from highly acidic aqueous solutions by rice and wheat bran. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 303:949–958Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yang SK, Tan N, Yan XM, Chen F, Lin YC (2013) Adsorption of thorium(IV) from aqueous solution by non-living biomass of mangrove endophytic fungus Fusarium sp. #ZZF51. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 298:827–833Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yang SK, Tan N, Wu WLX, Hou J, Xiang KX, Lin YC (2015) Biosorption of thorium(IV) from aqueous solution by living biomass of marine-derived fungus Fusarium sp. #ZZF51. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 306:99.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4060-2 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Khalili FI, Khalifa A, Al-Banna G (2017) Removal of uranium(VI) and thorium(IV) by insolubilized humic acid originated from Azraq soil in Jordan. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 311:1375Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ting C, Nan Z, Zhao X, Xin H, Zhuhong D (2019) Integrated comparisons of thorium(IV) adsorption onto alkali-treated duckweed biomass and duckweed-derived hydrothermal and pyrolytic biochar. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:2523–2530Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li L, Quinlivan PA, Knappe DRU (2002) Effects of activated carbon surface chemistry and pore structure on the adsorption of organic contaminants from aqueous solution. Carbon 40:2085–2100Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Alshabanat M, Alsenani G, Almufarij R (2013) Removal of crystal violet dye from aqueous solutions onto date palm fiber by adsorption technique. J Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/210239 Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Weber WJ, Morris JC (1963) Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division. 89(2):31–60Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Larabi L, Harek Y, Traisnel M, Mansri A (2004) Inhibition behavior of mild steel in 1 M HCl in the presence of poly(4-vinylpyridine) (P4VP) and potassium iodide. J Appl Electrochem 34:833–839Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    El-Awady GY, El-Said IA, Fouda AS (2008) Anion surfactants as corrosion inhibitors for aluminum dissolution in HCl solutions. Int J Electrochem Sci 3:174–190Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Environment and Water, Research Institute, King Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsDhahranSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.College of Science and Health Professions King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health SciencesNational Guard Health AffairsJeddahSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceThe University of JordanAmmanJordan

Personalised recommendations