Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 321, Issue 3, pp 791–803 | Cite as

Preparation and characterization of a novel diatomite-based composite and investigation of its adsorption properties for uranyl ions

  • Zeynep Mine Şenol
  • Dilek Şenol Arslan
  • Selçuk ŞimşekEmail author
Article
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

In this research, Polyacrylamide-diatomite (PAA-D) composite was used as adsorbent for the efficient removal of uranyl ions from aqueous solution. The chemical and morphological properties of PAA-D composite were confirmed by several analysis. Batch experiments were performed as a function of solution pH, initial concentration, kinetic, thermodynamic and recovery. The maximum metal uptake capacity was found as 0.085 mol kg−1. Kinetic data were best interpreted by a pseudo second order model. Thermodynamic findings showed that the adsorption process was exothermic, spontaneous and process with increased disorderliness at solid/solution interface. The recovery studies showed that PAA-D composite had good adsorption/desorption performance.

Keywords

Diatomite Uranyl Composite Polyacrylamide Adsorption 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present study (Project No: ZARA002) was partly supported by Cumhuriyet University Scientific Research Projects Commission (CUBAP), Sivas in Turkey.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Keith LS, Faroon OM, Fowler BA (2007) Uranium. In: Berlin M, Zalups RK, Fowler BA (eds) Handbook on the toxicology of metals. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 880–903Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang Y, Chen Y, Liu C, Yu F, Chi Y, Hu C (2017) The effect of magnesium oxide morphology on adsorption of U(VI) from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 316:936–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abney CW, Mayes RT, Saito T, Dai S (2017) Materials for the recovery of uranium from seawater. Chem Rev 117:13935–14013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu Y, Zhao Z, Yuan D, Wang Y, Dai Y, Chew WJ (2018) Fast and high amount of U (VI) uptake by functional magnetic carbon nanotubes with phosphate group. Ind Eng Chem R 57:14551–14560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barron-Zambrano J, Laborie S, Viers P, Rakib M, Durand G (2004) Mercury removal and recovery from aqueous solutions by coupled complexation–ultrafiltration and electrolysis. J Membr Sci 229:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jossa A, Kellera E, Aldera AC, Gobela A, McArdella CS, Ternes T (2005) Siegrist H removal of pharmaceuticals and fragrances in biological wastewater treatment. Water Res 39:3139–3152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sajid M, Nazal MK, Baig IN, Osman AM (2018) Removal of heavy metals and organic pollutants from water using dendritic polymers based adsorbents: a critical review. Sep Purif Technol 191:400–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Uddin MK (2017) A review on the adsorption of heavy metals by clay minerals, with special focus on the past decade. Chem Eng J 308:438–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu Y, Zhao Z, Yuan D, Wang Y, Dai Y, Zhu Y, Chew JW (2019) Introduction of amino groups into polyphosphazene framework supported on CNT and coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles for enhanced selective U(VI) adsorption. Appl Surf Sci 466:893–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Monier M, Abdel-Latif DA (2013) Synthesis and characterization of ion-imprintedresin based on carboxymethyl cellulose for selective removal of UO2 2+. Carbohydr Polym 97:743–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li WP, Han XY, Wang XY, Wang YQ, Wang WX, Xu H, Tan TS, Wu WS, Zhang HX (2015) Recovery of uranyl from aqueous solutions using amidoximated polyacrylonitrile/exfoliated Na-montmorillonite composite. Chem Eng J 279:735–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liao Y, Wang M, Chen D (2018) Preparation of polydopamine-modified graphene oxide/chitosan aerogel for uranium (VI) adsorption. Ind Eng Chem R 57:8472–8483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Babel S, Kurniawan TA (2003) Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water. J Hazard Mater 97:219–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khraisheh MAM, Al-degs YS, Mcminn WAM (2004) Remediation of wastewater containing heavy metals using raw and modified diatomite. Chem Eng J 99:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Al-Ghouti MA, Khraisheh MAM, Ahmad MNM, Allen S (2009) Adsorption behaviour of methylene blue onto Jordanian diatomite: a kinetic study. J Hazard Mater 165:589–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simşek S, Senol ZM, Ulusoy HI (2017) Synthesis and characterization of a composite polymeric material including chelating agent for adsorption of uranyl ions. J Hazard Mater 338:437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sprynskyy M, Kovalchuk I, Buszewsk B (2010) The separation of uranium ions by natural and modified diatomite from aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater 181:700–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sheng G, Wang S, Hu J, Lu Y, Li J, Dong Y, Wang X (2009) Adsorption of Pb(II) on diatomite as affected via aqueous solution chemistry and temperature. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 339:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Caliskan N, Kul AR, Alkan S, Gokirmak Sogut E, Alacabey I (2011) Adsorption of zinc(II) on diatomite and manganese-oxide-modified diatomite: a kinetic and equilibrium study. J Hazard Mater 193:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yu W, Deng L, Yuan P, Liu D, Yuan W, Liu P, He H, Li Z, Chen F (2015) Surface silylation of natural mesoporous/macroporous diatomite for adsorption of benzene. J Colloid Interface Sci 448:545–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lin JX, Zhan SL, Fang MH, Qian XQ (2007) The adsorption of dyes from aqueous solution using diatomite. J Porous Mater 14:449–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chiem LT, Huynh L, Ralston J, Beattie DA (2006) An in situ ATR–FTIR study of polyacrylamide adsorption at the talc surface. J Colloid Interface Sci 297:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bagci C, Kutyla GP, Kriven WM (2017) Fully reacted high strength geopolymer made with diatomite as a fumed silica alternative. Ceram Int 43:14784–14790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mukerabigwi JF, Lei S, Fan L, Wang H, Luo S, Ma X, Qin J, Huang X, Cao Y (2016) Eco-friendly nano-hybrid superabsorbent composite from hydroxyethyl cellulose and diatomite. RSC Adv 6:31607–31618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jaques BJ, Watkins J, Croteau JR, Alanko GA, Tyburska-Püschel B, Meyer M, Xu P, Lahoda EJ, Butt DP (2015) Synthesis and sintering of UN-UO2 fuel composites. J Nucl Mater 466:745–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang Y, Fan C, Wang H, Wang F, Xu J, Duan P, Zhang Y (2015) Effects of TiO2 on the sintering densification of UO2–Gd2O3 burnable poison fuel. Ceram Int 41:10185–10191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kumari P, Sharma P, Srivastava S, Srivastava MM (2006) Biosorption studies on shelled Moringa oleifera Lamarck seed powder: removal and recovery of arsenic from aqueous system. Int J Miner Process 78:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li Z, Chen F, Yuan L, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Chai Z, Shi W (2012) Uranium(VI) adsorption on graphene oxide nanosheets from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 210:539–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shao L, Zhong J, Ren Y, Tang H, Wang X (2017) Perhydroxy-CB[6] decorated graphene oxide composite for uranium(VI) removal. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 311:627–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Langmuir I (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc 40:1361–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Freundlich HMF (1906) Over the adsorption in solution. J Phys Chem 57:385–471Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Helfferich F (1962) Ion exchange. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Romero-Gonzalez J, Peralta-Videa JR, Rodrıguez E, Ramirez SL, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2005) Determination of thermodynamic parameters of Cr(VI) adsorption from aqueous solution onto Agave lechuguilla biomass. J Chem Thermodyn 37:343–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tseng RL, Wu FC, Juang RS (2010) Characteristics and applications of the Lagergren’s first-order equation for adsorption kinetics. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 41:661–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ho YS, McKay G (1999) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem 34:451–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wu FC, Tseng RL, Juang RS (2009) Initial behavior of intraparticle diffusion model used in the description of adsorption kinetics. Chem Eng J 153:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cheung WH, Szeto YS, McKay G (2007) Intraparticle diffusion processes during acid dye adsorption onto chitosan. Bioresour Technol 98:2897–2904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Boparai HK, Joseph M, O’Carroll DM (2011) Kinetics and thermodynamics of cadmium ion removal by adsorption onto nano zerovalent iron particles. J Hazard Mater 186:458–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liu Y, Dai Y, Yuan D, Wang Y, Zou L (2017) The preparation of PZS-OH/CNT composite and its adsorption of U(VI) in aqueous solutions. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 314(3):1747–1757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sprynskyy M, Kowalkowski T, Tutu H, Cukrowska EM, Buszewski B (2015) Ionic liquid modified diatomite as a new effective adsorbent for uranium ions removal from aqueous solution. Colloids Surf A 465:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lu S, Hu J, Chen C, Chen X, Gong Y, Sun Y, Tan X (2017) Spectroscopic and modeling investigation of efficient removal of U(VI) on a novel magnesium silicate/diatomite. Sep Purif Technol 174:425–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Salameh S, Khalili FI, Al-Dujaili AH (2017) Removal of U(VI) and Th(IV) from aqueous solutions by organically modified diatomaceous earth: evaluation of equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic data. Int J Miner Process 168:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shuibo X, Chun Z, Xinghuo Z, Jing Y, Xiaojian Z, Jingsong W (2009) Removal of uranium (VI) from aqueous solution by adsorption of hematite. J Environ Radioact 100:162–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Donat R, Cılgı G, Aytas S, Cetisli H (2008) Thermodynamic parameters and sorption of U(VI) on ACSD. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 279:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zeynep Mine Şenol
    • 1
  • Dilek Şenol Arslan
    • 2
  • Selçuk Şimşek
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Food Technology, Zara Vocational SchoolCumhuriyet UniversitySivasTurkey
  2. 2.Materials Science and Nanotechnology Engineering Department, Engineering FacultyAbdullah Gül UniversityKayseriTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceCumhuriyet UniversitySivasTurkey

Personalised recommendations