Reductive dissolution studies of CeO2 and simulated mixed oxide fuel of (Ce, U)O2 in nitric acid medium

  • K. Dhamodharan
  • T. Aneesh
  • Anitha PiusEmail author


In dissolution studies involving plutonium oxide, oxides of cerium are employed as a non radioactive surrogate. A reductive dissolution of cerium oxide and mixed oxide consisting cerium-uranium were investigated in nitric acid medium in presence of uranous. Extensive dissolution studies were carried out using ceria powder in pure HNO3 and HNO3–[N2H5]+ [NO3] with U(IV). The effects of temperature, mixing rate and concentration of reducing agent on dissolution efficiency of CeO2 were investigated. The apparent activation energy was calculated from Arrhenius plot for dissolution of cerium oxide in HNO3 in presence of uranous stabilized by hydrazine and it was found to be about 40 kJ mol−1 in the temperature range of 300–350 K. The fraction of total mass of uranium and cerium from the mixed oxide pellet leached as function of time was monitored during dissolution performed under optimized conditions and dissolution yield was found to be > 99%.


Reductive dissolution MOX fuel Advanced fuel Oxides of cerium Dissolution of ceria 



Authors are highly thankful to Dr. A. Ravisankar, Distinguished Scientist, Director, Reprocessing Group, Dr. R. Natarajan, Former Director, Reprocessing Group and Dr. R. V. Subba Rao, Head, Process and Radio Chemistry Division for their valuable suggestions and encouragement during the course of this work. The contributions of Dr. N. Desigan during preparation of manuscript are highly acknowledged. The valuable contribution during experimental part from Shri D. Sivakumar, Shri P. K. Sharma, Shri Pugazhendi, Shri N. Srinivasan, Shri S. N. Das, Smt. Rekha and Smt. D. Jeyandhi Chemical Laboratory, Reprocessing Group is greatly acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Natarajan R (1998) Challenges in fast reactor fuel reprocessing. IANCAS Bull 14(2):27–32Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Natarajan R, Raj B (2007) Fast reactor fuel reporcessing technology in India. J Nucl Sci Technol 44(3):393–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lanham WB, Runion TC (1949) Purex process for plutonium and uranium recovery. ORNL: 479, Carbide and carbon chemical corporation, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Natarajan R, Dhamodharan K, Sharma PK, Pugazhendi S, Vijayakumar V, Subba Rao RV (2013) Optimization of flow sheet for scrubbing of Ruthenium in reprocessing of fast reactor spent fuel. Sep Sci Technol 48:2494–2498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Natarajan R, Raj B (2011) Fast reactor fuel reprocessing technology: successes and challenges. Energy Proceedia 7:414–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sood DD, Patil SK (1996) Chemistry of nuclear fuel reprocessing: current status. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 203(2):547–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mincher BJ, Mezyk SP (2009) Radiation chemical effects on radiochemistry: a review of examples important to nuclear power. Radiochim Acta 97:519–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mossini E, Macerata E, Giola M, Brambilla L, Castiglioni C, Mariani M (2014) Radiation-induced modifications on physico chemical properties of diluted nitric acid solutions within advanced spent nuclear fuel reprocessing. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 304(1):395–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pikaev AK, Gogolev AV, Shilov VP (1997) Radiation chemistry of aqueous solutions of actinides. Russ Chem Rev 66:763–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aneheim E, Hedberg M (2016) Dissolution performance of plutonium nitride based fuel material. Procedia Chem 21:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kleykamp H (1999) Selection of material as diluents for burning of plutonium fuel in nuclear reactor. J Nucl Mater 275:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Puthiyavinayagam P, Selvaraj P, Balasubramaniyan V, Raghupathy S, Velusamy K, Devan K, Nashine BK, Padma Kumar G, Suresh Kumar KV, Varatharajan S, Mohanakrishnan P, Srinivasan G, Bhaduri AK (2017) Development of fast breeder reactor technology in India. Prog Nucl Energy 101:19–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crawford DC, Porter DL, Hayes SL (2007) Fuels for sodium-cooled fast reactors: US perspective. J Nucl Mater 371:202–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Larsen RP, Shor RS, Feder HM (1954) A study of the explosive properties of uranium–zirconium alloys. Argonne National Lab, LemontCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martin F, Field B (1958) The reactions of zirconium and zirconium based alloys with nitric and nitric-hydrofluoric acids. Part I. Hazardous aspects. Part II. Dissolution rates. United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority. Research Group. Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Harwell, Berks, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rodriguez P, Bhoje SB (1998) The FBR program in India. Energy 23(7/8):629–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singh G, Kumar P, Save ND, Malav RK, Mahanty BN, Das DK, Mishra AK, Behere PG, Afzal M, Kumar A (2016) Impurity analysis and dissolution behavior of plutonium bearing impure MOX scrap: an assessment of recycling feasibility. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 309:1159–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raj B, Kamath HS, Natarajan R, Vasudeva Rao PR (2005) A perspective on fast reactor fuel cycles in India. Prog Nucl Energy 47(1–4):369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Desigan N, Bhatt NP, Pandey NK, Kamachi Mudali U, Natarajan R, Joshi JB (2017) Mechanism of dissolution of nuclear fuel in nitric acid relevant to nuclear fuel reprocessing. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 312:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Machuron-Mandard X, Madic C (1994) Basic studies on the kinetics and mechanism of the rapid dissolution reaction of plutonium dioxide under reducing conditions in acidic media. J Alloys Compd 213–214:100–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bourges J, Madic C, Koehly G, Leconte M (1986) Dissolution of plutonium bioxide in nitric acid medium with electrogenerated silver(II). J Less Common Met 122:303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zundelevich Y (1992) The mediated electrochemical dissolution of plutonium oxide: kinetics and mechanism. J Alloys Compd 182:115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barney GS (1977) The kinetics of plutonium oxide dissolution in nitric/hydrofluoric acid mixtures. J Inorg Nucl Chem 39:1665–1669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Madic C, Berger P, Machuron-Mandard X (1992) Mechanisms of the rapid dissolution of plutonium dioxide in acidic media under oxidizing or reducing conditions. In: Transuranium elements-a half century. American Chemical Society, pp 457–468Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim HS, Joung CY, Lee BH, Oh JY, Koo YH, Heimgartner P (2008) Applicability of CeO2 as a surrogate for PuO2 in a MOX fuel development. J Nucl Mater 378:98–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davies W, Gray W (1964) A rapid and specific titrimetric method for the precise determination of uranium using iron(II) sulphate as reductant. Talanta 11:1203–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Subba Rao RV, Damodaran K, Santosh Kumar G, Ravi TN (2000) Determination of uranium and plutonium in high active solutions by extractive spectrophotometry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 246(2):433–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zheng Y, Wu H, Cao L, Jia S (2012) Economic evaluation on the MOX fuel in the closed fuel cycle. Sci Technol Nucl Install 2012:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Konno K, Hirosawa T (2002) Melting temperature of mixed oxide fuels for fast reactors. J Nucl Sci Technol 39(7):71–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chandramouli V, Anthonysamy S, Vasudeva Rao PR (1999) Combustion synthesis of thoria, a feasibility study. J Nucl Mater 265:255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jain A, Ananthasivan K, Anthonysamy S, Rao PRV (2005) Synthesis and sintering of (U0.72Ce0.28)O2 solid solution. J Nucl Mater 345:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Venkata Krishnan R, Panneerselvam G, Singh BM, Kothandaraman B, Jogeswararao G, Antony MP, Nagarajan K (2011) Synthesis, characterization and thermal expansion measurements on U–Ce mixed oxides. J Nucl Mater 414:393–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Maji D, Ananthasivan K, Venkata Krishnan R, Balakrishnan S, Amirthapandian S, Joseph K, Dasgupta A (2018) Nanocrystalline (U0.5Ce0.5)Ox solid solutions through citrate gel-combustion. J Nucl Mater 502:370–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ganesh S, Khan F, Ahmed MK, Pandey SK (2011) Potentiometric determination of free acidity in presence of hydrolysable ions and a sequential determination of hydrazine. Talanta 85:958–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dhamodharan K, Pius A (2016) Sequential determination of free acidity and Plutonium concentration in the dissolver solution of fast breeder reactor spent fuels in single aliquot. Anal Sc. 32:401–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chitnis RT, Kulkarini RT, Rege SG (1969) 430, BARC reportGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Masti SP, Seetharamappa J, Melwanki MB, Motohashi N (2002) Spectrophotometric determination of cerium(IV) using a phenothiazine derivative. Anal Sci 18:167–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Beaudoux X, Virot M, Chave T, Leturcq G, Jouan G, Venault L, Moisy P, Nikitenko SI (2016) Ultrasound-assisted reductive dissolution of CeO2 and PuO2 in the presence of Ti particles. Dalton Trans 45(21):8802–8815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Inoue A (1998) Enhanced dissolution of PuO2 in nitric acid using uranium(IV). J Chern Soc Faraday Trans I 84(4):1195–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dhamodharan K, Pius A, Sharma PK, Pugazhendi S, Vijakumar V (2014) Electro reductive dissolution of plutonium oxide: a preliminary study. Int J Chem Sci Appl 5:68–75Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Baba AA, Adekola FA, Toye EE, Bale RB (2009) Dissolution kinetic and leaching of rutile ore in hydrochloric acid. J Miner Mater Charact Eng 8(10):787–801Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Aydogan S, Aras A, Cambazoglu M (2005) Dissolution kinetics of sphalerite in acidic ferric chloride leaching. Chem Eng J 114:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Levenspel O (1998) Chemical reaction engineering, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Reprocessing GroupIndira Gandhi Centre for Atomic ResearchKalpakkamIndia
  2. 2.The Gandhigram Rural Institute - Deemed University, GandhigramDindigulIndia

Personalised recommendations