Advertisement

Selective uranium adsorption using modified acrylamide resins

  • Sameh H. Negm
  • Abd Allh M. Abd El-Hamid
  • Mohamed A. Gado
  • Hassan S. El-Gendy
Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

Polymeric matrices composed of N,N′-Methylenebis(acrylamide)/glycidyl methacrylate was prepared and modified producing two resins (GMA/MBA/OH and GMA/MBA/SO3H). The adsorption of U(VI) ions onto the modified acrylamide resins was studied from synthetic and granite samples. For better understanding around the uranium mineralization and the rock-forming minerals of the hosted granitic rocks, to facilitate the choice of the appropriate ore-processing techniques, it was necessary to identify the mineral composition and the radiometric specifications of the used granitic rock. The synthesized adsorbents revealed a promising selective adsorption toward the U(VI) ions from its bearing solutions even with the competence of other cations.

Keywords

Uranium Acrylamide Glycidyl methacrylate Adsorption 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhou A, Wang J (2018) Recovery of U(VI) from simulated wastewater with thermally modified palygorskite beads. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 318:1119–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Donia AM, Atia AA, Moussa EMM, El-Sherif AM, Abd El-Magied MO (2009) Removal of uranium(VI) from aqueous solutions using glycidyl methacrylate chelating resins. Hydrometallurgy 95:183–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sadeek SA, El-Sayed MA, Amine MM, Abd El- Magied MO (2014) A chelating resin containing trihydroxybenzoic acid as the functional group; synthesis and adsorption behavior for Th(IV) and U(VI) ions. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 299:1299–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sadeek SA, El-Sayed MA, Amine MM, El-Magied MOA (2014) Selective solid-phase extraction of U(VI) by amine functionalized glycidyl methacrylate. J Environ Chem Eng 2:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gładysz-Płaska A, Grabias E, Majdan M (2018) Simultaneous adsorption of uranium(VI) and phosphate on red clay. Prog Nucl Energy 104:150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sun Z, Chen D, Chen B, Kong L, Su M (2018) Enhanced uranium(VI) adsorption by chitosan modified phosphate rock. Colloids Surf A 547:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu Z, Liu D, Cai Z, Wang Y, Zhou L (2018) Synthesis of new type dipropyl imide chelating resin and its potential for uranium(VI) adsorption. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 318:1219–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gado MA (2018) Sorption of thorium using magnetic graphene oxide polypyrrole composite synthesized from natural source. Sep Sci Technol 53:2016–2033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abd El-Magied MO, Mansour A, Alsayed FA, Atrees MS, Abd Eldayem S (2018) Biosorption of beryllium from aqueous solutions onto modified chitosan resin: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic study. J Dispersion Sci Technol 39:1597–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abd El-Magied MO, Galhoum AA, Atia AA, Tolba AA, Maize MS, Vincent T, Guibal E (2017) Cellulose and chitosan derivatives for enhanced sorption of erbium(III). Colloids Surf A 529:580–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abd El-Magied MO (2016) Sorption of uranium ions from their aqueous solution by resins containing nanomagnetite particles. J Eng 2016:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sadeek SA, Moussa EM, El-Sayed MA, Amine MM, El-Magied MOA (2014) Uranium(VI) and thorium(IV) adsorption studies on chelating resin containing pentaethylenehexamine as a functional group. J Dispersion Sci Technol 35:926–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abd El-Magied MO, Dhmees AS, Abd El-Hamid AAM, Eldesouky EM (2018) Uranium extraction by sulfonated mesoporous silica derived from blast furnace slag. J Nucl Mater 509:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ang KL, Li D, Nikoloski AN (2017) The effectiveness of ion exchange resins in separating uranium and thorium from rare earth elements in acidic aqueous sulfate media. Part 1. Anionic and cationic resins. Hydrometallurgy 174:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ang KL, Li D, Nikoloski AN (2018) The effectiveness of ion exchange resins in separating uranium and thorium from rare earth elements in acidic aqueous sulfate media. Part 2. Chelating resins. Miner Eng 123:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hu W, Lu S, Song W, Chen T, Hayat T, Chen C, Liu H, Alsaedi NS (2018) Competitive adsorption of U(VI) and Co(II) on montmorillonite: a batch and spectroscopic approach. Appl Clay Sci 157:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Klingenberg A, Seubert A (2002) Sulfoacylated poly(styrene–divinylbenzene) copolymers as resins for cation chromatography: comparison with sulfonated, dynamically coated and silica gel cation exchangers. J Chromatogr A 946:91–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Malik MA (2009) Carbonyl groups in sulfonated styrene-divinylbenzene macroporous resins. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:696–6965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pirogov AV, Chernova MV, Nemtseva DS, Shpigun OA (2003) Sulfonated and sulfoacylated poly(styrene–divinylbenzene) copolymers as packing materials for cation chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem 376:745–752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    El-Magied MOA, Mohammaden TF, El-Aassy IK, Gad HM, Hassan AM, Mahmoud MA (2017) Decontamination of uranium-polluted groundwater by chemically-enhanced, sawdust-activated carbon. Colloids Interf 1:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saluzzo C, Lamouille T, Herault D, Lemaire M (2002) Polymer-supported catalysts: enantioselective hydrogenation and hydrogen transfer reduction. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 12:1841–1844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yu Y, Sun Y (1999) Macroporous poly(glycidyl methacrylate-triallyl isocyanurate-divinylbenzene) matrix as an anion-exchange resin for protein adsorption. J Chromatogr A 855:129–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marczenko Z (1986) Separation and Spectrophotometric determination of elements. Wiely, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zahran MA, Mahmoud KF, Mahdy MA, Abd El-Hamid AM (2007) Leaching of gallium from Gattar granite, Eastern Desert, Egypt. Isot Radiat Res 39:115–126Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Habashi F (1993) A textbook of hydrometallurgy. Department of Mining & Metallurgy, Laval University, Quebec CityGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shalaby MH, Abu Zeid EK, Mahdy NM (2015) Erratum to: on the petrogenesis and evolution of U-rich granite: insights from mineral chemistry studies of Gattar granite, North Eastern Desert, Egypt. Arab J Geosci 8:3587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hansink JD (1976) Equilibrium analyses of sandstone roll-front uranium deposits. Int Atomic Energy Ag Vienna 8:683–693Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stuckless JS, Nkomo IT, Wenner DB, Trump GV (1984) Geochemistry and uranium favourability of postorogenic granites of the north-eastern Arabian Shield, Kingdome of Saudi Arabia. Bull Fac Eart Sci King Abdel Aziz Univ 6:195–209Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shapiro L (1975) Rapid analysis of silicate, carbonate and phosphate rocks. US Geol Surv Bull 1401:70–76Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meinrath G (1981) Aquatic chemistry of uranium. Geoscience 1:1–100Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Elshehy EA (2017) Removal of uranium ions from liquid radioactive waste using modified aluminosilica. Sep Sci Technol 52:1852–1861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Abd El-Magied MO, Hassan AM, Gad HMH, Mohammaden TF, Youssef MAM (2017) Removal of nickel (II) ions from aqueous solutions using modified activated carbon: a kinetic and equilibrium study. J Dispersion Sci Technol 39:862–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gado MA, Morsy A (2017) Preparation of poly-aniline–magnetic porous carbon composite for using as uranium adsorbent. Am J Mater Synth Process 2:32–40Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Abd El-Magied MO, Elshehy EA, Manaa EA, Tolba AA, Atia AA (2016) Kinetics and thermodynamics studies on the recovery of thorium ions using amino resins with magnetic properties. Ind Eng Chem Res 55(2016):11338–11345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Abd El-Magied MO, Tolba AA, El-Gendy HS, Zaki SA, Ati AA (2017) Studies on the recovery of Th(IV) ions from nitric acid solutions using amino-magnetic glycidyl methacrylate resins and application to granite leach liquors. Hydrometallurgy 169:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Elshehy EA, Shenashen MA, Abd El-Magied MO, El-Nahas AM, Tolan DA, Halada K, Atia AA, El-Safty SA (2017) Selective recovery of silver(I) ions from e-waste using cubicallymulti-thiolated cage mesoporous monoliths. Eur J Inorg Chem 2017:4823–4833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tag El-Din AF, Elshehy EA, Abd El-Magied MO, Atia AA, El-Khouly ME (2018) Decontamination of radioactive cesium ions using ordered mesoporous monetite. RSC Adv. 8:19041–19050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Abd El-Magied MO, Salem WM, Daher AA, Elshehy EA (2018) Fabrication of silica microspheres (HB/A@SI-MNS) for hafnium and zirconium recovery from zirconyl leach liquor. Colloids Interfaces 2:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mohamaden TF (1996) Correlative studies on some uraniferous radioactive granitic rocks in Qattar, El-Missikate, El-Erediya and Um-Ara area, Eastern desert, Egypt. M. Sc. In Geology, Ain Shams University, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Salman AB, Shalaby MH, Nosier LM (1990) Uranium province, northern RedSea Hills, Egypt. Int Earth Sci Congr 1:89–101Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sameh H. Negm
    • 1
  • Abd Allh M. Abd El-Hamid
    • 2
  • Mohamed A. Gado
    • 1
  • Hassan S. El-Gendy
    • 1
  1. 1.Research SectorNuclear Materials AuthorityCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Production SectorNuclear Materials AuthorityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations