Advertisement

Effect of control rod insertion on the TRIGA neutron spectrum and the determination of elemental concentrations with k0-INAA

  • Lojze Gačnik
  • Klemen Ambrožič
  • Sebastjan Rupnik
  • Vladimir Radulović
  • Radojko Jaćimović
Article

Abstract

We suspected that changes in the neutron spectrum, caused by varying control rod positions in routine steady state operation of our TRIGA nuclear reactor, coupled with the k0 formalism, were the cause of systematically biased concentrations compared to assigned values. To confirm this, we investigated the effect of control rod insertion on the spectrum parameters f and α, and the subsequent effect on the determination of concentrations with k0-INAA. We determined the spectra for three control rod configurations, in three irradiation positions, using the bare triple-monitor method, as well as using MCNP simulations, and compared the results.

Keywords

k0 instrumental neutron activation analysis Neutron spectrum determination Neutron spectrum variability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was performed in the scope of program group P1-0143 at the Jožef Stefan Institute, within the project PR-06174, financed by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS). The authors wish to thank the Metrology Institute of the Republic of Slovenia (MIRS), as their work contributes to MIRS/IJS Contract No. 6401-5/2009/27 for activities and obligations performed as a Designate Institute as an etalon for amount of substance/chemical trace elements/in the organic and inorganic materials. The work of this study is part of project ENVCRM, which was funded within the framework of the EMPIR.

References

  1. 1.
    De Corte F (1987) The k 0-standardization method: a move to the optimization of neutron activation analysis, Habilitation Thesis. Ghent University, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jaćimović R, Trkov A, Stegnar P (2012) Error in k 0-NAA measurement due to temporal variation in the neutron flux in TRIGA Mark II reactor. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 294:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Torres MRA, Manzano JVL, Moya EV, et al. (2017) Key comparison CCQM-K127 “Contaminants and other elements in soil” Final Report, Metrologia, 54, Tech. Suppl., 08010. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0026-1394/54/1A/08010. Accessed 28 Aug 2017
  4. 4.
    Jovanović S, Smodiš B, Jaćimović R, Vukotić P, Stegnar P (1989) Neutron flux variability at the TRIGA Mark II reactor, Ljubljana, as a parameter with applying the k 0-method of NAA. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 135:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ogilvie JF (1984) A Monte-Carlo approach to error propagation. Comput Chem 8:205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bučar T (2008) Evaluation of overall measurement uncertainty using the k 0-based neutron activation analysis, PhD in Slovene. Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeraj R, Ravnik M (1999) TRIGA Mark II Reactor: U(20)-Zirconium hydride fuel rods in water with graphite reflector, IEU-COMP-THERM-003. International handbook of evaluated criticality safety benchmark experiments, NEA/NSC/DOC(95)03. OECD-NEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ravnik M, Jeraj R (2003) Research reactor benchmarks. Nucl Sci Eng 145:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Snoj L, Trkov A, Jaćimović R, Rogan P, Žerovnik G, Ravnik M (2011) Analysis of neutron flux distribution for the validation of the computational methods for the optimization of research reactor utilization. Appl Radiat Isot 69:136–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Snoj L, Kavčič A, Žerovnik G, Ravnik M (2010) Calculation of kinetic parameters for mixed TRIGA cores with Monte Carlo. Ann Nucl Energy 37:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Radulović V, Štancar Ž, Snoj L, Trkov A (2014) Validation of absolute axial neutron flux distribution calculations with MCNP with 197Au(n, γ)198Au reaction rate distribution measurements at the JSI TRIGA Mark II reactor. Appl Radiat Isot 84:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Štancar Ž, Snoj L, Barbot L, Lengar I, Destouches C, Lell R (2017) Reaction rate distribution experiments at the Slovenian JSI Triga Mark II research reactor, International handbook of evaluated reactor physics benchmark experiments (NEA, 7329). OECD Nucl Energy Agency, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Štancar Ž, Barbot L, Destouches C, Fourmentel D, Villard JF, Snoj L (2018) Computational validation of the fission rate distribution experimental benchmark at the JSI TRIGA Mark II research reactor using the Monte Carlo method. Ann Nucl Energy 112:94–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Snoj L, Žerovnik G, Trkov A (2012) Computational analysis of irradiation facilities at the JSI TRIGA reactor. Appl Radiat Isot 70:483–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beričič J, Snoj L (2017) On the calculation of angular neutron flux in MCNP. Ann Nucl Energy 100:128–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ambrožič K, Žerovnik G, Snoj L (2017) Computational analysis of the dose rates at JSI TRIGA reactor irradiation facilities. Appl Radiat Isot 130:140–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goorley JT, et al. (2013) Initial MCNP6 Release overview—MCNP6 version 1.0. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Report number: LANL Report LA-UR-13-22934Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chadwick MB, Oblozinsky P, Herman M et al (2006) ENDF/B-VII.0: next generation evaluated nuclear data library for nuclear science and technology. Nucl Data Sheets 107:2931–3060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trkov A, Radulović V, Snoj L (2017) The GRUPINT neutron spectrum adjustment code—general features and characterization of the spectra in three irradiation channels of the JSI TRIGA reactor. International Symposium on Reactor Dosimetry (ISRD-16), Santa FeGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    k0-database 2015 (2016) The k 0-database in Excel file (k0_database_2015_12_04.xls) http://www.kayzero.com/k0naa/k0naaorg/Nuclear_Data_SC/Entries/2016/1/11_New_k0-data_Library_2015.html. Accessed 11 Jan 2016
  21. 21.
    Jaćimović R, De Corte F, Kennedy G, Vermaercke P, Revay Z (2014) The 2012 recommended k 0 database. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 300:589–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Štancar Ž, Snoj L (2017) An improved thermal power calibration method at the TRIGA Mark II research reactor. Nucl Eng Des 325:78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Krane KS (2014) Neutron capture by 94,96Zr and the decays of 97Zr and 97Nb. Appl Radiat Isot 94:60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesJožef Stefan InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Reactor Physics DepartmentJožef Stefan InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia
  3. 3.Reactor Infrastructure CentreJožef Stefan InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia
  4. 4.Jozef Stefan International Postgraduate SchoolLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations