Cesium release during high-temperature pre-treatment of fuel fragments with a burn-up of 61 GWd/tU

  • Jae-Won Lee
  • Do-Yoon Lee
  • Young-Soon Lee
  • Joo-Young Yoon
  • Sang-Chae Jeon
  • Ju-Ho Lee
  • Seok-Min Hong
  • Yung-Zun Cho
Article

Abstract

The electrolytic reduction process in pyroprocessing of used fuel requires that fuel fragments be pre-treated to remove cesium and iodine. The effect of high temperatures and fuel fragment size on release of cesium was investigated over 10 h at a temperature of 1300–1400 °C for fuel fragments with an O/U ratio of 2.2. Re-fragmentation of the original fragments was observed as changes in cesium release count rates as fuel was heated from 484 to 1329 °C. The release of cesium is highly dependent on the size of fuel fragments and most of the cesium is released as the temperature is held at the maximum target value.

Keywords

Used fuel Cesium release Fragment Thermal pre-treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Nuclear Research & Development Program of National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (MSIP), Republic of Korea.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee H, Park GI, J-W Lee, Kang KH, Hur JM, Kim JG, Paek S, Kim IT, Cho IJ (2013) Current status of pyroprocessing development at KAERI. Sci Technol Nucl Install 2013:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee H (2015) Oxide electroreduction and other processes for pyrochemical processing of spent fuels: Developments in Korea. In: Taylor R (ed) Reprocessing and recycling of spent fuel. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 415–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sakamura Y (2011) Effect of alkali and alkaline-earth chloride addition on electrolytic reduction of UO2 in LiCl salt bath. J Nucl Mater 412:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hermann SD, Li SX (2010) Separation and recovery of uranium metal from spent light water reactor fuel via electrolytic reduction and refining. Nucl Technol 171:247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cho YZ, Park GH, Lee HS, Kim IT, Han DS (2010) Concentration of cesium and strontium elements involved in a LiCl waste salt by a melt crystallization process. Nucl Technol 171:325–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shiba K (1975) Fission iodine and xenon release from the UO2–U3O8 system with emphasis on radiation damage. J Nucl Mater 57:217–279Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bae KK, Kim BG, Lee YW, Yang MS, Park HS (1994) Oxidation behavior of unirradiated UO2 pellet. J Nucl Mater 209:274–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lewis BJ, Dickson R, Iglesias FC, Ducros G, Kudo T (2008) Overview of experimental programs on core melt progression and fission product release behavior. J Nucl Mater 308:126–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lindemer TB, Besmann TM (1985) Chemical thermodynamic representation of 〈UOx〉. J Nucl Mater 130:473–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Song KC, Park GI, Lee JW, Park JJ, Yang MS (2007) Fractional release behavior of volatile and semivolatile fission products during voloxidation and OREOX treatment of spent PWR fuel. Nucl Technol 162:158–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park KJ, Ju JS, Kim JS, Shin HS, Chun YB, Kim HD (2009) Determination of burnup and Pu/U ratio of PWR spent fuels by gamma-ray spectrometry. Nucl Eng Technol 41:1307–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lassmann K, O’Carroll C, Laar J, Walker CT (1994) The radial distribution of plutonium in high burnup UO2 fuels. J Nucl Mater 208:223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ha YK, Kim JS, Jeon YS, Han SH, Seo HS, Song KS (2009) Local burnup characteristics of PWR spent nuclear fuels discharged from Yeonggwang-2 nuclear power plant. Nucl Eng Technol 42:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noirot J, Noirot L, Desgranges L, Lamontagne J, Blay T, Pasquet B, Muller E (2004) Fission gas inventory in PWR high burnup fuel: Experimental characterization and modeling. Proceedings of the 2004 international meeting on LWR fuel performance. American Nuclear Society, Orlando, pp 329–337Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guillet JL, Guérin Y, Nuclear fuels. http://www.materials.cea.fr/en/PDF/MonographiesDEN/Nuclear-fuels-CEA-en.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2016
  16. 16.
    Lemoine F (1997) High burnup fuel behavior related to fission gas effects under reactivity initiated accidents (RIA) conditions. J Nucl Mater 248:238–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lemoine F, Papin J, Frizonnet JM, Cazalis B, Rigat H (2000) The role of grain boundary fission gases in high burn-up fuel under reactivity initiated accident conditions. Seminar proceedings of the fission gas behaviour in water reactor fuels. Nucl Energy Agency, Cadarache, pp 175–187Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Une K, Kashibe S, Takagi A (2006) Fission gas release behavior from high burnup UO2 fuels under rapid heating conditions. J Nucl Sci Technol 43:1161–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hiernaut JP, Wiss T, Colle JY, Thiele H, Walker CT, Goll W, Konings RJM (2008) Fission products release and microstructure changes during laboratory annealing of a very high burn-up fuel specimen. J Nucl Mater 377:313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pontillon Y, Ferroud-Plattet MP, Parrat D, Ravel S, Ducros G, Struzik C, Aubrun I, Eminet G, Lamontagne J, Noirot J, Harrer A (2004) Experimental and theoretical investigation of fission gas release from UO2 up to 70 GWd/t under simulated LOCA type conditions: the GASPARD program. Proceedings of the 2004 international meeting on LWR fuel performance. American Nuclear Society, Orlando, pp 490–499Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Esnoul C, Largenton R, Petry C, Michel JC, Michel B, Boulore A (2015) Use of a micromechanical approach to investigate transient fuel fragmentation mechanics. In: Proceedings part I of top fuel 2015 conference, European Nuclear Society, Zurich, pp 476–485Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Menegon P, Desgranges L, Pontillon Y, Poulesquen A (2008) Evidence of two gas release kinetics during the oxidation of an irradiated PWR UO2 fuel. J Nucl Mater 378:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lewis BJ, Andre B, Morel B, Dehaudt P, Maro D, Purdy PL, Cox DS, Iglesias FC, Osborne MF, Lorenz RA (1995) Modelling the release behaviour of cesium during severe fuel degradation. J Nucl Mater 227:83–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marin JF, Contamin P (1969) Uranium and oxygen self-diffusion in UO2. J Nucl Mater 30:16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mansouri MA, Olander DR (1998) Fission product release from trace UO2+x. J Nucl Mater 254:22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lorenz RA, Osborne MF (1995) A summary of ORNL fission product release tests with recommended release rates and diffusion coefficients. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL/TM-12801Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jae-Won Lee
    • 1
  • Do-Yoon Lee
    • 1
  • Young-Soon Lee
    • 1
  • Joo-Young Yoon
    • 1
  • Sang-Chae Jeon
    • 1
  • Ju-Ho Lee
    • 1
  • Seok-Min Hong
    • 1
  • Yung-Zun Cho
    • 1
  1. 1.Korea Atomic Energy Research InstituteDaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations