Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 303, Issue 1, pp 577–581 | Cite as

Comparison of rapid liquid scintillation multivariate technique with conventional techniques for regular surveillance of water samples

  • Priyanka J. Reddy
  • Vandana Pulhani
  • S. P. D. Bhade
  • R. V. Kolekar
  • Rajvir Singh
  • S. K. Jha
  • K. S. Pradeepkumar
Article
  • 156 Downloads

Abstract

Liquid scintillation multivariate, gamma spectrometry and radiochemical separation techniques were used for estimating 3H, 90Sr and 137Cs in bore well samples. Using multivariate technique, 3H, 90Sr and 137Cs has been assayed in triple labeled samples. The same samples were also estimated by other routinely used techniques, like gamma spectrometry to estimate 137Cs, radio-chemical separation followed by subsequent counting using GM counter for 90Sr. The samples were distilled for 3H and its activity was estimated using liquid scintillation counting with the prepared calibration curve. Our results show that liquid scintillation multivariate is an easy and rapid method capable of estimating 3H, 90Sr and 137Cs in water samples with ±10 % deviation for 3H and ±13 % deviation for 137Cs. However, in case of 90Sr the results obtained by conventional method and the simultaneous analysis by liquid scintillation multivariate technique are varying around ±29 %. This could be attributed to error introduced by matrix interference in the conventional analysis.

Keywords

Gamma spectrometry Liquid scintillation counting Multivariate method Radiochemical separation Spectral index of external standard 

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization (2006) Guidelines for drinking water qualityGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin JE (1987) Appl Radiat Isot 38(11):953–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grate JW, Strebin R, Janata J (1996) Anal Chem 68:333–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heilgeist M (2006) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 245(3):249–254Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hegde AG, Sharma LN, Chandramouli S, Rao DD, Matkar V, Verma PC, Rajan MP, Reviewed by Rudran K, Iyengar MAR, Gurg RP, Sundaram M (1998), Environmental surveillance, Procedure ManualGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    IAEA Technical Report Series No. 295 (1989), ViennaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vajda N, Kim CK (2010) Appl Radiat Isot 68:2306–2326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matsui Y, Takiue M (1991) Appl Radiat Isot 42(9):841–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paloma M, Penalver A, Aguilar C, Borrull F (2007) Appl Radiat Isot 65:1048–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaihola L (1993) Sci Total Environ 130(13:1):297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schonhofer F, Garcia-Leon M, Garcia-Tenorio R (Eds) (1994) World Scientific, Singapore, 155.4Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    USEPA (2004) Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual, Volume II: Chapters 10-17 and Appendix F, EPA/402/B-04/001B (NUREG-1576) Washington, DC http://www.epa.gov/radiation/marlap/manual.html

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Priyanka J. Reddy
    • 1
  • Vandana Pulhani
    • 2
  • S. P. D. Bhade
    • 1
  • R. V. Kolekar
    • 1
  • Rajvir Singh
    • 1
  • S. K. Jha
    • 2
  • K. S. Pradeepkumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiation Safety Systems DivisionBhabha Atomic Research CentreMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Health Physics DivisionBhabha Atomic Research CentreMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations