Removal of uranium(VI) from aqueous solutions using nanoporous ZnO prepared with microwave-assisted combustion synthesis
- 368 Downloads
- 14 Citations
Abstract
The adsorption of the uranyl ions from aqueous solutions on the nanoporous ZnO powders has been investigated under different experimental conditions. The adsorption of uranyl on nanoporous ZnO powders were examined as a function of the contact times, pH of the solution, concentration of uranium(VI) and temperature. The ability of this material to remove U(VI) from aqueous solution was followed by a series of Langmuir and Freunlinch adsorption isotherms. The adsorption percent and distribution coefficient for nanoporous ZnO powders were 98.65 % ± 1.05 and 7,304 mL g−1, respectively. The optimum conditions were found as at pH 5.0, contact time 1 h, at 1/5 Zn2+/urea ratio, 50 ppm U(VI) concentration and 303 K. The monomolecular adsorption capacity of nanoporous ZnO powders for U(VI) was found to be 1,111 mg g−1 at 303 K. Using the thermodynamic equilibrium constants obtained at different temperatures, various thermodynamic parameters, such as ΔG°, ΔH° and ΔS°, have been calculated. Thermodynamic parameters (ΔH° = 28.1 kJ mol −1, ΔS° = 160.30 J mol−1 K−1, ΔG° = −48.54 kJ mol−1) showed the endothermic and spontaneous of the process. The results suggested that nanoporous ZnO powders was suitable as sorbent material for recovery and adsorption of U(VI) ions from aqueous solutions.
Keywords
Adsorption Uranium Nanoporous ZnO powders Combustion synthesisReferences
- 1.Tian J, Xu J, Zhu F, Lu T, Su C, Ouyang G (2013) J Chromatogr A 1300:2–16Google Scholar
- 2.Hristovski K, Baumgardner A, Westerhoff P (2007) J Hazard Mater 147:265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Gajewicz A, Rasulev B, Dinadayalane TC, Urbaszek P, Puzyn T, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J (2012) Adv Drug Deliver Rev 64:1663–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Peyghan AA, Bagheric Z (2012) Appl Surf Sci 258:8171–8176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Phuruangrat T, Thongtem S (2009) Mater Lett 63:1224–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Hong R, Pan T, Qian J, Li H (2006) Chem Eng J 119:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Liewhiran C, Seraphin S, Phanichphant S (2006) Curr Appl Phys 6:499–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Salavati-Niasari M, Davar F, Mazaheri M (2008) Mater Lett 62:1890–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hua M, Zhang S, Pan B, Zhang W, Lv L, Zhang Q (2012) J Hazard Mater 211–212:317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Fua Y, Sub Y, Lina C (2004) State Ionics 166(2004):137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Clark DE (1996) Ann Rev Mater Sci 26:299–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Das D, Suresh kumar MK, Koley S, Mitha N, Pillai CGS (2010) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 285:447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Beheshtiana J, Peyghanb AA, Bagheri Z (2012) Appl Surf Sci 258:8171–8176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Singh J, Im JS, Whitten JE (2008) Nanophotonic materials V, Proceedings of SPIE 7030: 70300TGoogle Scholar
- 15.Boparai HK, Joseph M, O’Carroll DM (2010) J Hazard Mater. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.029 Google Scholar
- 16.Benedict B, Pigford TH, Levi HW (1981) Nucl Chem Eng. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 17.Yusan S, Akyil S (2008) J Hazard Mater 160:388–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Wang G, Wang X, Chai X, Liu J, Deng N (2010) Appl Clay Sci 47:448–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Muller K, Foerstendorf H, Meusel T, Brendler V, Lefevre G, Comarmond MJ, Payne TE (2012) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 76:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Krestou A, Xenidis A, Panias D (2004) Miner Eng 17:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Shuibo X, Chun Z, Xinghuo Z, Jing Y, Xiaojian Z, Jingsong W (2009) J Environ Radioact 100:162–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Ilaiyaraja P, Deb AKS, Sivasubramanian K, Ponraju D, Venkatraman B (2013) J Hazard Mater 250–251:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Fan QH, Li P, Chen YF, Wu WS (2011) J Hazard Mater 192:1851–1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Liu Y, Liu Y, Cao X, Hua R, Wang Y, Pang C, Hua M, Li X (2011) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 290–2:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Nazari K, Maragheh MG, Rad AJ (2011) Hydrometallurgy 71:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Agrawal YK, Shrivastav P, Menon SK (2000) Sep Purif Technol 20:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Rahmati A, Ghaemi A, Samadfam M (2012) Ann Nucl Energy 39:42–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Zhao D, Wang X, Yang S, Guo Z, Sheng G (2012) J Environ Radio 103:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Aslani MAA, Yusan S, Yenil N, Kuzu S (2012) Chem Eng J 200–202:391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Cao Y, Liu B, Huang R, Xia Z, Ge S (2011) Mater Lett 65:160–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Nehru LC, Swaminathan V, Sanjeeviraja C (2012) Powder Technol 226:29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Mustafa S, Shahida P, Naeem A, Dilara B, Rehama N (2002) Langmuir 18:2254–2259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Wei M, Liao JL, Liu N, Zhang D, Kang HJ, Yang YY, Yong Y, Jin JN (2007) Nucl Sci Technol 18:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Sprynskyy M, Kovalchuk I, Buszewski B (2010) J Hazard Mater 181:700–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Kilincarslan A, Akyil S (2005) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 264:541–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Donat R (2009) J Chem Thermodyn 41:829–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Liu Y, Cao X, Hua R, Wang Y, Liu Y, Pang C, Wang Y (2010) Hydrometallurgy 104–2:150–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar