Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 298, Issue 3, pp 2029–2035 | Cite as

DÖME: revitalizing a low-background counting chamber and developing a radon-tight sample holder for gamma-ray spectroscopy measurements

  • Zoltán KisEmail author
  • Péter Völgyesi
  • Zsuzsanna Szabó


There was an emerging need at the Nuclear Analysis and Radiography Department of the Centre for Energy Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest to be able to perform low level radioactivity measurements of various samples from in-beam activation and from environmental studies. Important aspects of reusing the low-background chamber called DÖME, which had been unused for some years, were the development of an easily reusable radon-tight sample container and the setup of a measurement system capable of counting extended samples in close-in geometry. As a result of our efforts a special sample container made of HDPE (High-density Polyethylene) was developed, and it is proved that the probability of a radon loss larger than the 2 % of its radioactive decay constant is <95 %. Due to the lack of reference samples, containing the same radionuclides as the unknown sample, the absolute method of measuring the activity concentration of nuclides in the sample had to be applied, which implied the reliable determination of the full-energy peak efficiency. A method called efficiency transfer combined with the correction for true coincidence summing effects is proven to be providing appropriate results and applied.


Gamma-ray spectroscopy Low-background chamber Radon-tight HDPE container Efficiency transfer True coincidence summing 



Peter Völgyesi thanks the foundation of the “Habilitas” fellowship of the Hungarian Development Bank Plc. (MFB Zrt.) The authors gratefully acknowledge the careful proofreading of J. L. Weil (NARD).


  1. 1.
    Papp Z, Dezső Z, Daróczy S (1997) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 222:171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manolopoulou M, Stoulos S, Mironaki D, Papastefanou C (2003) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 508:362–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashry AH, Abou-Leila M, Abdalla AM (2011) Radiat Meas 46:149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arafa W (2002) Radiat Meas 35:207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moens L, De Donder J, Xi-lei L, De Corte F, De Wispelaere A, Simonits A, Hoste J (1981) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 187:451–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moens L, De Corte F, Simonits A, Xilei L, De Wispelaere A, De Donder J, Hoste J (1982) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 70:539–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Révay Z, Belgya T, Molnár GL (2005) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 265:261–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    ERIKS (2012) Accessed 1 Aug 2013
  10. 10.
    Nagy HÉ, Breitner D, Horváth Á, Szabó C (2009) Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Mineralogischen Gesellschaft. Österreichische Mineralogische Gesellschaft, Vienna, p 109Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Mauring, T. Gäfvert, Appl Radiat Isot. Accessed 1 Aug 2013
  12. 12.
    Vidmar T (2005) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 550:603–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vidmar T, Kanisch G, Vidmar G (2011) Appl Radiat Isot 69:908–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bé M–M, Chisté V, Dulieu C, Mougeot X, Chechev VP, Kondev FG, Nichols AL, Huang X, Wang B (2013) Monographie BIPM-5—Table of radionuclides, Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), SevresGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zoltán Kis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Péter Völgyesi
    • 2
  • Zsuzsanna Szabó
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Nuclear Analysis and Radiography Department, Centre for Energy ResearchHungarian Academy of SciencesBudapest 114Hungary
  2. 2.Lithosphere Fluid Research Laboratory, Department of Petrology and GeochemistryEötvös UniversityBudapestHungary
  3. 3.Environmental Physics Department, Centre for Energy ResearchHungarian Academy of SciencesBudapest 114Hungary

Personalised recommendations