Treatment of radioactive liquid organic waste using bacteria community

  • Rafael Vicente de Pádua Ferreira
  • Solange Kazumi Sakata
  • Fernando Dutra
  • Patricia Busko Di Vitta
  • Maria Helena Tirollo Taddei
  • Maria Helena Bellini
  • Júlio Takehiro Marumo


Waste management plays an important role in radioactive waste volume reduction as well as lowering disposal costs and minimizing the environment-detrimental impact. The employment of biomass in the removal of heavy metals and radioisotopes has a significant potential in liquid waste treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the radioactive waste treatment by using three different bacterial communities (BL, BS, and SS) isolated from impacted areas, removing radioisotopes and organic compounds. The best results were obtained in the BS and BL community, isolated from the soil and a lake of a uranium mine, respectively. BS community was able to remove 92% of the uranium and degraded 80% of tributyl phosphate and 70% of the ethyl acetate in 20 days of experiments. BL community removed 81% of the uranium and degraded nearly 60% of the TBP and 70% of the ethyl acetate. SS community collected from the sediment of São Sebastião channel removed 76% of the uranium and 80% of the TBP and 70% of the ethyl acetate. Both americium and cesium were removed by all communities. In addition, the BS community showed to be more resistant to radioactive liquid waste than the other communities. These results indicated that the BS community is the most viable for the treatment of large volumes of radioactive liquid organic waste.


Radioactive waste Biodegradation Biosorption 


  1. 1.
    International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2004) Predisposal management of organic radioactive waste. IAEA–TECDOC-447, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim KJ, Shon JS, Ryu WS (2007) A practical method for the disposal of radioactive organic waste. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, DaejeonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilks JP, Holt NS (1990) Wet oxidation of mixed organic and inorganic radioactive sludge wastes from a water reactor. Waste Manage 10–3:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abdel-Rahman RO, El-Kamash AM, Ali HF, Hung YT (2011) Overview on recent trends and developments in radioactive liquid waste treatment part 1: sorption/ion exchange technique. Int J Environ Eng Sci 2:1–16Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abdel-Rahman RO, Ibrahium HA, Hung YT (2011) Liquid radioactive wastes treatment: a review. Water 3:551–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fabiano B, Pastorino R, Ferrando M (1998) Distillation of radioactive liquid organic wastes for subsequent wet oxidation. J Hazard Mater 57:105–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tikilili PV, Chirwa EMN (2009) Microbial degradation of recalcitrant organics from radioactive waste using indigenous cultures of naphthalene degrading bacteria. Chem Eng Trans 18:845–850Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tikilili PV, Nkhalambayausi-Chirwa EM (2011) Characterization and biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in radioactive wastewater. J Hazard Mater 192(3):1589–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martins M, Faleiro ML, Costa AMR, Chaves S, Tenreiro R, Matos AP (2010) Mechanism of uranium (VI) removal by two anaerobic bacterial communities. J Hazard Mater 184:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vijayaraghavan K, Yun Y (2008) Bacterial biosorbents and biosorption. Biotechnol Adv 26:266–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silva JIR, Ferreira ACM, Costa ACA (2009) Uranium biosorption under dynamic conditions: preliminary tests with Sargassum filipendula in real radioactive wastewater containing Ba, Cr, Fe, Mn, Pb, Ca and Mg. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 279:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anagnostopoulos VA, Bekatorou A, Symeopoulos BD (2011) Contribution to interpretation of metal uptake dependence upon the growth phase of microorganisms. The case of uranium (VI) uptake by common yeasts, cultivated at different temperatures, with or without aeration. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 287:665–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sarri S, Misaelides P, Papanikolaou M, Zamboulis D (2002) Uranium removal from acidic aqueous solutions by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Debaryomyces hansenii, Kluyveromyces marxianus and Candida colliculosa. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 252:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu N, Liao J, Luo S, Yang Y, Jin J, Zhang T, Zhao P (2003) Biosorption of 241Am by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 258:59–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silva NC, Fernandes EAN, Cipriani M, Taddei MHT (2001) The natural radioactivity of Brazilian phosphogypsum. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 249(1):251–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    American Public Health Association (1995) Standard methods for examination of water and waste water, 19th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, pp 3–63Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Amaral ECS, Azevedo HLP, Mendonça AH (1985) Pre-operational environmental survey at the uranium mine and mill site, Caldas, Minas Gerais. Sci Total Environ 48:257–266Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fernandes HM, Veiga LHS, Franklin MR, Prado VCS, Taddei JF (1995) Environmental impact assessment of uranium mining and milling facilities: a study case at the Caldas uranium mining and milling site. Braz J Geochem Explor 52:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Medeiros PM, Bícego MC (2004) Investigation of natural and anthropogenic hydrocarbon inputs in sediments using geochemical markers II. Santos, SP-Brazil. Mar Pollut Bull 49:761–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paje ML, Neilan B, Couperwhite L (1997) A Rhodococcus species that thrives on medium saturated with liquid benzene. Microbiology 143:2975–2981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    National Comittee for Clinical Laboratory Standards NCCLS (2003) Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A5, 6th edn. NCCLS, WayneGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thomas RA, Macaskie LE (1998) The effect of growth conditions on the biodegradation of tributyl phosphate and potential for the remediation of acid mine drainage waters by a naturally occurring mixed microbial culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 49:202–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gadd GM (2009) Biosorption: critical review of scientific rationale, environmental importance and significance for pollution treatment. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 84:13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nazeri Y, Sadeghi S, Rabbani M, Ghafourian H (2005) Biosorption of Cs+ by new bacterial strain (NRC-BT-2). Int Congr Ser 1276:272–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haferburg G, Merten D, Büchel G, Kothe E (2007) Biosorption of metal and salt tolerant microbial isolates from a former uranium mining area. Their impact on changes in rare earth element patterns in acid mine drainage. J Basic Microbiol 47:474–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Haferburg G, Reinicke M, Merten D, Büchel G, Kothe E (2007) Microbes adapted to acid mine drainage as source for strains active in retention of aluminum or uranium. J Geochem Explor 92:196–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Simonoff M, Sergeant C, Poulain S, Pravikoff MS (2007) Microorganisms and migration of radionuclides in environment. C R Chim 10:1092–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kuwahara C, Fukumoto A, Nishina M, Sugiyama H, Anzai Y, Kato F (2011) Characteristics of cesium accumulation in the filamentous soil bacterium Streptomyces sp. K202. J Environ Radioact 102:138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang J, Du J, Xie S, Du K, Song J (2011) Study on biosorption of heavy metal ion-uranium by Citrobacter freudii. Adv Mat Res 183–185:600–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hafez MB, Ibrahim MKh, Abdel-Razek AS, Abu-Shady MR (2002) Biosorption of some ions on different bacterial species from aqueous and radioactive waste solutions. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 252:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nakajima A, Tsuruta T (2004) Competitive biosorption of thorium and uranium by Micrococcus luteus. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 260:13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafael Vicente de Pádua Ferreira
    • 1
  • Solange Kazumi Sakata
    • 1
  • Fernando Dutra
    • 2
  • Patricia Busko Di Vitta
    • 3
  • Maria Helena Tirollo Taddei
    • 4
  • Maria Helena Bellini
    • 1
  • Júlio Takehiro Marumo
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e NuclearesIPEN-CNEN/SPSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul—UNICSUL, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da SaúdeSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Instituto de Química, Universidade de São Paulo-IQ-USPSão PauloBrazil
  4. 4.Laboratório de Caldas—LAPOC-CNEN/MGPoços de CaldasBrazil

Personalised recommendations