Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 286, Issue 2, pp 317–322 | Cite as

Determination of sorption capacity of fucoidic sands for Cs+ and Sr2+ under dynamic column conditions



In this paper, the sorption behavior of Cs+ and Sr2+ on column of fucoidic sands under dynamic flow conditions was investigated, and their sorption capacities (SC) towards these two cations were studied. The determination of SC is based on the construction of respective breakthrough curves using 137Cs and 85Sr radionuclides as isotopic indicators in laboratory experiments. The samples were taken from several parts of the borehole in the area of interest. Undisturbed cores of 5 cm in diameter and 10 cm long were put in the glass columns and the cores were perfectly tightened using acrylate resin. In this time-dependence study, the so-called cenoman background groundwater was used. A concentration of 10−6 mol/dm3 of Cs+ and Sr2+ in liquid phase individually was established using neutral salts of CsNO3 and Sr(NO3)2, respectively. The groundwater was introduced at the bottom of the columns by a multi-head peristaltic pump, at a constant flow-rate of about 4 cm3/h. The results show that the sorption capacity of the investigated fucoidic sands for 137Cs and 85Sr is 0.1–1.5 and 0.05–0.5 μmol/100 g, respectively, in dependence on the evaluation of corresponding breakthrough curves. Some differences in the behavior of the cores during the experiments have also been observed and explained.


Fucoidic sand Column Breakthrough sorption capacity 137Cs 85Sr 



This work was supported by the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic in the framework of the program TANDEM under contract No. FT-TA3/070.


  1. 1.
    Appello CGJ, Postma D (1993) Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 535Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marhol M (1982) Ion exchangers in analytical chemistry, their properties and use in inorganic chemistry. Elsevier Science Ltd., Amsterdam, p 585Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bower CA, Reitemeier RF, Fireman M (1952) Exchangeable cation analysis of saline and alkali soils. Soil Sci 73:251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Avila-Segura M (1999) Techniques for evaluating changes in chemical and mineralogical properties of acidified soils. MSc Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison. pp 134Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dohrmann R (2006) Appl Clay Sci 34:31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tan KH (2005) Soil sampling, preparation and analysis. CRC Press, USA, p 639Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sumner ME, Miller WP (1996) Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Part 3. Chemical methods. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, p 1201Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flury M, Czigány S, Chen G, Harsh JB (2004) J Contam Hydrol 71:111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ardois C, Szenknect S (2005) Radioprotection 40:S53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu L, Wang MK, Yang CC (2001) Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32:2359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Palágyi Š, Laciok A (2006) Czechoslov J Phys 56:D483Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klika Z, Weiss Z, Mellini M, Drábek M (2006) Appl Geochem 21:405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Palágyi Š, Szabová T (1991) Jad energie 37:177Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Navarčík I, Čipáková A, Palágyi Š (1994) J Radioecol 2:19Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frysinger G, Thomas HC (1954) Clays Clay Miner 3:239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fanfan PN, Mabon N, Thonart P, Lognay G, Chopin A, Barthelemy JP (2006) Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 10:93Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemistry of Fuel Cycle and Waste Management Division, Waste Disposal DepartmentNuclear Research Institute Řež plcHusinec-ŘežCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations