Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 286, Issue 1, pp 273–282 | Cite as

Rapid separation of actinides and radiostrontium in vegetation samples

  • Sherrod L. MaxwellIIIEmail author
  • Brian K. Culligan
  • Gary W. Noyes


A new rapid method for the determination of actinides and radiostrontium in vegetation samples has been developed at the Savannah River Site Environmental Lab (Aiken, SC, USA) that can be used in emergency response situations or for routine analysis. The actinides in vegetation method utilizes a rapid sodium hydroxide fusion method, a lanthanum fluoride matrix removal step, and a streamlined column separation process with stacked TEVA, TRU and DGA Resin cartridges. Lanthanum was separated rapidly and effectively from Am and Cm on DGA Resin. Alpha emitters are prepared using rare earth microprecipitation for counting by alpha spectrometry. The purified 90Sr fractions are mounted directly on planchets and counted by gas flow proportional counting. The method showed high chemical recoveries and effective removal of interferences. The actinide and 90Sr in vegetation sample analysis can be performed in less than 8 h with excellent quality for emergency samples. The rapid fusion technique is a rugged sample digestion method that ensures that any refractory actinide particles or vegetation residue after furnace heating is effectively digested.


Actinides Separation Vegetation Environmental Rapid 



This work was performed under the auspices of the Department of Energy, DOE Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500. The authors wish to acknowledge Shermette Upson, Jack Herrington and Becky Chavous for their assistance with this work.


  1. 1.
    Inn KGW (2004) In: Proceedings of the 50th annual conference on bioassay, analytical and environmental radiochemistry. Cincinnati, OH, p 113Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stricklin DL, Tjarnhage A, Nygren U (2002) Application of low energy gamma-spectrometry in rapid actinide analysis for emergency preparedness. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 251(1):69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Larivere D, Cumming TA, Kiser S, Li C, Cornett R (2008) Automated flow injection system using extraction chromatography for the determination of plutonium in urine by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J Anal At Spectrom 23:352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang J, Chen I, Chiu J (2004) Sequential isotopic determination of plutonium, thorium, americium, strontium and uranium in environmental and bioassay samples. Appl Radiat Isot 61:299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ageyev VA, Odintsov OO, Sajeniouk AD (2005) Routine radiochemical method for the determination of 90Sr, 238Pu, 239+240Pu, 241Am and 244Cm in environmental samples. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 264(2):337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vioque I, Manjon G, Garcia-Tenorio R, El-Daoushy F (2002) Determination of alpha-emitting Pu isotopes in environmental samples. Analyst 127:530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Epov V, Benkhedda K, Evans RD (2005) Determination of Pu isotopes in vegetation using a new online FI-ICP-DRC-MS protocol after microwave digestion. J Anal At Spectrom 20:990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sill C (1974) Purification of radioactive tracers for use in high sensitivity alpha spectrometry. Anal Chem 46(11):1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maxwell SL III, Jones VD (2009) Rapid determination of actinides in urine by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and alpha spectrometry: a hybrid approach. Talanta 80(1):143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Varga Z, Suranyi G, Vadja N, Stefanka Z (2007) Rapid sequential determination of americium and plutonium in sediment and soil samples by ICP-SFMS and alpha-spectrometry. Radiochim Acta 95:81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martin JP, Odell KJ (1998) The development of emergency radioanalytical techniques for the determination of radiostrontium and transuranic radioisotopes in environmental material. Radioact Radiochem 9(3):49–59Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sherrod L. MaxwellIII
    • 1
    Email author
  • Brian K. Culligan
    • 1
  • Gary W. Noyes
    • 2
  1. 1.Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLCAikenUSA
  2. 2.Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLCAikenUSA

Personalised recommendations