Evaluation of a new generation quadrupole-based ICP-MS for uranium isotopic measurements in environmental samples

  • F. PointurierEmail author
  • A. Hubert
  • N. Baglan
  • P. Hémet
Mass Spectrometric Methods for the Determination of Ultra Trace Actinides


We compare the analytical performance of a modern quadrupole-based ICP-MS (“X-Series”, Thermo-Electron, Winsford, UK) with a single-collector double-focusing sector-field ICP-MS (“Axiom”, VG Elemental, Winsford, UK) for uranium isotopic measurements in environmental samples. We focus on the precision and accuracy obtained with both instruments for the 235U/238U isotopic ratios and on the abundance sensitivity that is a key parameter for low 236U/238U isotopic ratios measurements. We observe that isotopic measurements are more precise accurate with the “X-Series” than with the “Axiom”. Besides, we demonstrate that the “Axiom’s” higher abundance sensitivity limits its capability to measure 236U/238U ratio below a few ppm.


Isotopic Ratio Relative Standard Deviation Mass Bias Isotopic Ratio Measurement Isotopic Standard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. S. Becker, H. J. Dientze, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 14 (1999) 1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Kerl, J. S. Becker, H. J. Dientze, W. Dannecker. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 359 (1997) 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Pointurier, N. Baglan, P. Hemet, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 60 (2003) 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Baglan, P. Hemet, F. Pointurier, R. Chiappini, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 261 (2004) 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. F. Boulyga, J. L. Matusevitch, V. P. Mironov, V. P. Kudrjashov, L. Halicz, I. Segal, J. A. McLean, A. Montaser, J. S. Becker, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 17 (2002) 958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. E. Ketterer, K. M. Hafer, C. L. Link, C. S. Royden, W. J. Hartsock, J. Environ. Radioact., 67 (2003) 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Pointurier, N. Baglan, P. Hemet, in: Plasma Source Mass Spectrometry: Current Trends and Future Developments, RSC Publishing, Cambridge, 2005, p. 130.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. G. Heumann, S. M. Gallus, G. Radlinger, J. Vogl, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 13 (1998) 1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. D. Taylor, P. De Bievre, A. J. Walder, A. J. Entwistle, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 10 (1995) 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. M. Nelms (Ed.), ICP Mass Spectrometry Handbook, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2005, p. 166.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. M. Nelms, C. R. Quetel, T. Prohaska, J. Vogl, P. D. P. Taylor, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 16 (2001) 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Thirlwall, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 16 (2001) 1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Pointurier
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Hubert
    • 1
  • N. Baglan
    • 1
  • P. Hémet
    • 1
  1. 1.Commissariat à l’Energie AtomiqueDAM-DIF/DASE/SRCEBruyères-le-ChâtelFrance

Personalised recommendations