Advertisement

13X zeolite as Difunctional nucleating agent regulating the crystal form and improving the Foamability of blocked copolymerized polypropylene in supercritical CO2 foaming process

  • Shicheng ZhaoEmail author
  • Chunmeng Pan
  • Zhong Xin
  • Yu Li
  • Wei Qin
  • Shuai Zhou
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Comparing with solid counterpart, plastic foams exhibit many merits, such as lightweight, excellent energy absorption, good thermal insulation and sound absorption properties. Blocked copolymerized polypropylene (PPB) is a kind of foamable polymer, but it is challenging to obtain the PPB foam with high expansion ratio, uniform cell structure and good toughness. In this study, 13X zeolite was used as nucleating agent for both crystallization process and foaming process. During the crystallization process, 13X zeolite used as β-nucleating agent not only improved the crystallization behavior but also induced the β-form crystal, thereby improving the toughness of PPB. During the foaming process, 13X zeolite used as cell nucleating agent improved the foamability of PPB by increasing the content of CO2 dissolved in PPB melt due to its porous structure. The experiment results revealed that when the content of 13X zeolite was 0.5 wt%, the relative content of β-crystal (kβ), the crystallization temperature (Tc) and the impact strength of PPB were greatly increased from 0.17, 114 °C, 838.9 J/m to 0.64, 122 °C, 952.9 J/m respectively. Moreover, at that content, the expansion ratio (Rv) of PPB foam reached the maximum value of 41 times under the optimal foaming temperature and pressure.

Keywords

Blocked copolymerized polypropylene Foam 13X zeolite β-crystal Nucleating agent Supercritical carbon dioxide 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 21476085 and 21878089), National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFB0302201) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (22221818010).

References

  1. 1.
    Wang L, Wan D, Qiu J, Tang T (2012) Effects of long chain branches on the crystallization and foaming behaviors of polypropylene-g-poly(ethylene-co-1-butene) graft copolymers with well-defined molecular structures. Polymer 53(21):4737–4757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zou J, Lei YZ, Liang M, Zou HW (2015) Effect of nano-montmorillonite as cell opener on cell morphology and resilient performance of slow-resilience flexible polyurethane foams. J Polym Res 22(10):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang L, Hikima Y, Ishihara S, Ohshima M (2017) Fabrication of lightweight microcellular foams in injection-molded polypropylene using the synergy of long-chain branches and crystal nucleating agents. Polymer 128:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhou S, Zhao S, Xin Z, Wang W (2014) A novel strategy for achieving high melt strength polypropylene and an investigation of its Foamability. J Macromol Sci B 53(10):1695–1714Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saniei M, Tran MP, Bae SS, Boahom P, Gong PJ, Park CB (2016) From micro/nano structured isotactic polypropylene to a multifunctional low-density nanoporous medium. RSC Adv 6(109):108056–108066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nofar M, Guo Y, Park CB (2013) Double crystal melting peak generation for expanded polypropylene bead foam manufacturing. Ind Eng Chem Res 52(6):2297–2303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li Y, Yao Z, Chen ZH, Qiu SL, Zeng CC, Cao K (2015) High melt strength polypropylene by ionic modification: preparation, rheological properties and foaming behaviors. Polymer 70:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xing WY, Yuan HX, Zhang P, Yang HY, Song L, Hu Y (2013) Functionalized lignin for halogen-free flame retardant rigid polyurethane foam: preparation, thermal stability, fire performance and mechanical properties. J Polym Res 20(9):234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang A, Peng XF, Turng LS (2018) In-situ fibrillated polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) via melt blending: effect on rheological behavior, mechanical properties, and microcellular foamability. Polymer 134:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang L, Ishihara S, Ando M, Minato A, Hikima Y, Ohshima M (2016) Fabrication of high expansion microcellular injection-molded polypropylene foams by adding long-chain branches. Ind Eng Chem Res 55(46):11970–11982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stumpf M, Sporrer A, Schmidt HW, Altstadt V (2011) Influence of supramolecular additives on foam morphology of injection-molded i-PP. J Cell Plast 47(6):519–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rizvi A, Park CB, Favis BD (2015) Tuning viscoelastic and crystallization properties of polypropylene containing in-situ generated high aspect ratio polyethylene terephthalate fibrils. Polymer 68:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhai W, Kuboki T, Wang L, Park CB, Lee EK, Naguib HE (2010) Cell structure evolution and the crystallization behavior of polypropylene/clay nanocomposites foams blown in continuous extrusion. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(20):9834–9845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sun HW, Zhao ZG, Yang Q, Yang LY, Wu PP (2017) The morphological evolution and beta-crystal distribution of isotactic polypropylene with the assistance of a long chain branched structure at micro-injection molding condition. J Polym Res 24(5):75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang R, Ding L, Zhang X, Li J (2018) Nonisothermal crystallization, melting behaviors, and mechanical properties of isotactic polypropylene nucleated with a liquid crystalline polymer. Ind Eng Chem Res 57(6):2083–2093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shi SH, Zhang X, Liu YS, Nie M, Wang Q (2016) Crystalline modification and morphology of polypropylene developed under the combined effects of montmorillonite and self-assembly beta nucleating agent. Compos Sci Technol 135:76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kersch M, Schmidt HW, Altstädt V (2016) Influence of different beta-nucleating agents on the morphology of isotactic polypropylene and their toughening effectiveness. Polymer 98:320–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang GL, Hou SS, Cao JH, Ding P, Shen JF, Chen JB (2018) Reinforcing and toughening isotactic polypropylene through shear-induced crystallization and -nucleating agent induced crystallization. J Polym Res 25(11):233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salaün F, Vroman I, Bedek G, Lewandowski M (2008) Effects of microparticles on isotactic polypropylene: thermomechanical and thermal properties. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 46(23):2566–2576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laguna-Gutierrez E, Lopez-Gil A, Saiz-Arroyo C, Van Hooghten R, Moldenaers P, Rodriguez-Perez MA (2016) Extensional rheology, cellular structure, mechanical behavior relationships in HMS PP/montmorillonite foams with similar densities. J Polym Res 23(12):251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yamaguchi M, Suzuki KI (2001) Rheological properties and foam processability for blends of linear and crosslinked polyethylenes. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 39(18):2159–2167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li Y, Pan C, Xin Z, Zhou S, Meng X, Zhao S (2018) Rheological, crystallization and foaming behaviors of high melt strength polypropylene in the presence of polyvinyl acetate. J Polym Res 25(2):46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hu SF, Zhu XB, Hu W, Yan L, Cai C (2013) Crystallization behaviors and foaming properties of diatomite-filled polypropylene composites. Polym Bull 70(2):517–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xin CL, He YD, Li QC, Huang YZ, Yan BR, Wang XD (2011) Crystallization behavior and foaming properties of polypropylene containing ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene under supercritical Carbondioxide. J Appl Polym Sci 119(3):1275–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee JWS, Park CB, Kim SG (2007) Reducing material costs with microcellular/fine-celled foaming. J Cell Plast 43(4–5):297–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Krause B, Haussler L, Voigt D (2006) Comparison of the molecular properties and morphology of polypropylenes irradiated under different atmospheres and after annealing. J Appl Polym Sci 100(1):634–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ellingham T, Duddleston L, Turng LS (2017) Sub-critical gas-assisted processing using CO2 foaming to enhance the exfoliation of graphene in polypropylene + graphene nanocomposites. Polymer 117:132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang WX, Zhou S, Xin Z, Shi YQ, Zhao SC, Meng X (2016) Preparation and foaming mechanism of foamable polypropylene based on self-assembled nanofibrils from sorbitol nucleating agents. J Mater Sci 51(2):788–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang L, Hikima Y, Ohshima M, Sekiguchi T, Yano H (2018) Evolution of cellular morphologies and crystalline structures in high-expansion isotactic polypropylene/cellulose nanofiber nanocomposite foams. RSC Adv 8(28):15405–15416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ortiz RA, Valdez AEG, Ramos ZXR, Berlanga OA, Flores RA, Padilla MGM et al (2017) Development of rigid toughened photocurable epoxy foams. J Polym Res 24(7):110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li DP, Li CX, Jiang XL, Liu T, Zhao L (2018) Synergistic effects of intumescent flame retardant and nano-CaCO3 on foamability and flame-retardant property of polypropylene composites foams. J Cell Plast 54(3):615–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li D, Wang C, Wang Z (2014) Foaming behaviour of microcellular foam short carbon fibres/polypropylene/nano-CaCO3 composites. Plast Rubber Compos 43(4):130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ding J, Shangguan JN, Ma WH, Zhong Q (2013) Foaming behavior of microcellular foam polypropylene/modified nano calcium carbonate composites. J Appl Polym Sci 128(6):3639–3651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dutta A, Sankarpandi S, Ghosh AK (2018) Evaluation of polypropylene/clay nanocomposite foamability based on their morphological and rheological aspects. J Cell Plast 54(5):829–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bhattacharya S, Gupta RK, Jollands M, Battacharya SN (2009) Foaming behavior of high-melt strength polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci 49(10):2070–2084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ding J, Ma WH, Song FJ, Zhong Q (2013) Effect of nano-calcium carbonate on microcellular foaming of polypropylene. J Mater Sci 48(6):2504–2511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Li M, Li G, Fan Y, Jiang J, Ding Q, Dai X, Mai K (2014) Effect of nano-ZnO-supported 13X zeolite on photo-oxidation degradation and antimicrobial properties of polypropylene random copolymer. Polym Bull 71(11):2981–2997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jones AT, Aizlewood JM, Beckett DR (1964) Crystalline forms of isotactic polypropylene. Die Makromolekulare Chemie 75(1):134–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rabello MS, White JR (1997) The role of physical structure and morphology in the photodegradation behaviour of polypropylene. Polym Degrad Stab 56(1):55–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tejeda EH, Sahagun C, Gonzalez-Nunez R, Rodrigue D (2005) Morphology and mechanical properties of foamed polyethylene-polypropylene blends. J Cell Plast 41(5):417–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yang JT, Huang LQ, Li LL, Zhang YF, Chen F, Zhong MQ (2013) Preparation of polystyrene/graphene oxide composites and their supercritical carbon dioxide foaming. J Polym Res 20(6):173CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Polymer Society, Taipei 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shicheng Zhao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chunmeng Pan
    • 1
  • Zhong Xin
    • 1
  • Yu Li
    • 1
  • Wei Qin
    • 1
  • Shuai Zhou
    • 1
  1. 1.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multiphase Materials Chemical Engineering, Department of Product EngineeringEast China University of Science and TechnologyShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations