Advertisement

Journal of Polymer Research

, 26:37 | Cite as

New approach on structure-property relationships of stabilized natural rubbers

  • Rungsima Chollakup
  • Potjanart Suwanruji
  • Rattana Tantatherdtam
  • Wirasak SmitthipongEmail author
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

The stabilization of natural rubber (NR) was studied using four NR samples, namely, whole natural rubber (WNR), deproteinized natural rubber (DPNR), acetone extracted natural rubber (ANR) and purified natural rubber (PNR). Proteins and lipids, which are non-rubber components in NR, significantly affect storage hardening via gel formation. The main function of the applied viscosity stabilizer was to perturb the dynamics of the NR structure, or alternatively, the formation of gel networks of the rubber chains with lipids and proteins, respectively. The Mooney viscosity and molecular weight of NR samples with the viscosity stabilizer added were found to be almost constant after 12 weeks. Moreover, the NR samples with the viscosity stabilizer required a longer curing time, presumably due to less gel network formation and the conventional packing of linear rubber chains. The results from crosslinking density and molecular weight measurements revealed that the viscosity stabilizer also had a role in stabilizing crosslinks between the chains and preventing the reversion to NR. The new approach of on structure-property relationships of stabilized natural rubbers has been proposed.

Keywords

Natural rubber Viscosity stabilizer Dynamic structures, non-rubber components 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI), Kasetsart University, Thailand. The authors wish to thank Specialized center of Rubber and Polymer Materials in agriculture and industry (RPM), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University for the publication support. For characterization of the rubber samples, the authors wish to thank the Centre for Rubber Research, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University (Thailand), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University (Thailand) and Rubber Research Institute of Thailand.

References

  1. 1.
    Amnuaypornsri Y, Sakdapipanich J, Toki S, Hsiao B, Ichikawa N, Tanaka Y (2007) Paper#16, the meeting of the fall rubber division, ACS, Cleveland, Ohio, Oct 16–18, 2007, 81, 753–765Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smitthipong W, Suethao S, Shah D, Vollrath F (2016) Interesting green elastomeric composites: silk textile reinforced natural rubber. Polym Testing 55:7–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li L, Smitthipong W, Zeng H (2015) Mussel-inspired hydrogels for biomedical and environmental applications. Polym Chem 6:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chollakup R, Smitthipong W, Chworos A (2014) DNA-functionalized polystyrene particles and their controlled self-assembly. RSC Adv 4:0648–30653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chollakup R, Smitthipong W (2012) Chemical structure, thermal and mechanical properties of poly (nucleotide)–cationic amphiphile films. Polym Chem 3:2350–2354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prasertsri S, Rattanasom N (2012) Fumed and precipitated silica reinforced natural rubber composites prepared from latex system: mechanical and dynamic properties. Polym Testing 31:593–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang S, Zhang X, Wua X, Lu C (2016) Tailoring percolating conductive networks of natural rubber composites for flexible strain sensors via a cellulose nanocrystal templated assembly. Soft Matter 12:845–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flory PJ, Rehner JJ (1943) Statistical mechanics of cross-linked polymer networks I. rubberlike elasticity. J Chem Phys 11:512–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vaysse L, Beuve JS, Bonfils F (2012) SEC-MALS study of dynamic structuring of natural rubber: comparative study of two Hevea brasiliensis genotypes. J Appl Polym Sci 124:570–1577Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yunyongwattanakorn J, Tanaka Y, Kawahara S, Klinklai W, Sakdapipanich J (2003) Effect of non-rubber components on storage hardening. Rubber Chem Technol 76:1228–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakaramontri Y, Pichaiyut S, Wisunthorn S, Nakason C (2017) Hybrid carbon nanotubes and conductive carbon black in natural rubber composites to enhance electrical conductivity by reducing gaps separating carbon nanotube encapsulates. Eur Polym J 90:467–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smitthipong W, Nardin M, Schultz J, Nipithakul T, Suchiva K (2004) Study of tack properties of uncrosslinked natural rubber. J Adhesion Sci Technol 18:1449–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ngolemasango F, Ehabe E, Aymard C, Sainte-Beuve J, Nkouonkam B, Bonfils F (2003) Role of short polyisoprene chains in storage hardening of natural rubber. Polym Int 52:1365–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nimpaiboon A, Sriring M, Sakdapipanich JT (2016) Molecular structure and storage hardening of natural rubber: insight into the reactions between hydroxylamine and phospholipids linked to natural rubber molecule. J Appl Polym Sci 133:43753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nawamawat K, Sakdapipanich JT, Ho CC (2010) Effect of Deproteinized Methods on the Proteins and Properties of Natural Rubber Latex during Storage. Macromol Symp 288:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kawahara S, Ruangdech J, Isono Y, Hikosaka M, Tanaka Y (2003) Effect of non-rubber components on the crystallization behavior or natural rubber. J Macromol Sci 42:761–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smitthipong W, Nardin M, Schultz J (2008) Effect of bulk and surface properties on adhesion of rubbers. Kasetsart J (Nat Sci) 42:318–324Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Amnuaypornsri S, Nimpaiboon A, Sakdapipanich J (2009) Role of phospholipids and proteins on gel formation and physical properties of NR during accelerated storage. Kaut Gummi Kunsts 62:88–92Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tarachiwin L, Sakdapipanich J, Ute K, Kitayama T, Tanaka Y (2005) Structural characterization of alpha-terminal group of natural rubber. 1. Decomposition of branch-points by lipase and phosphatase treatments. Biomacro 6:1858–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Toki S, Sics I, Ran S, Liu L, Hsiao BS, Murakami S, Tosaka M, Kohjiya S, Poomprsdub S, Ikeda Y, Tsou AH (2004) Strain-induced molecular orientation and crystallization in natural and synthetic rubbers under uniaxial deformation by in-situ synchrotron x-ray study. Rubber Chem Technol 77:317–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alig I, Pötschke P, Lellinger D, Skipa T, Pegel S, Kasaliwal GR, Villmow T (2012) Establishment, morphology and properties of carbon nanotube networks in polymer melts. Polym 53:4–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 21.
    Suchiva K, Kowitteerawut T, Srichantamit L (2000) Structure properties of purified natural rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 78:1495–1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 22.
    Xu L, Huang C, Luo M, Qu W, Liu H, Gu Z, Jing L, Huang G, Zheng J (2015) A rheological study on non-rubber component networks in natural rubber. RSC Adv 5:91742–91750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [23.
    Smitthipong W, Nardin M, Schultz J, Suchiva K (2007) Adhesion and self-adhesion of rubbers, crosslinked by electron beam irradiation. Int J Adhes Adhes 27:352–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Polymer Society, Taipei 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rungsima Chollakup
    • 1
  • Potjanart Suwanruji
    • 2
  • Rattana Tantatherdtam
    • 1
  • Wirasak Smitthipong
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Kasetsart Agricultural and Agro-Industrial Product Improvement Institute (KAPI)Kasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceKasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand
  3. 3.Specialized center of Rubber and Polymer Materials in agriculture and industry (RPM), Department of Materials Science, Faculty of ScienceKasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand
  4. 4.Office of Natural Rubber Research Program, The Thailand Research Fund (TRF)BangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations