Effects of self-assembled sorbitol-derived compounds on the structures and properties of biodegradable poly(L-lactic acid) prepared by melt blending

  • Wei-Chi LaiEmail author
  • Yu-Chen Lee


The microstructures and characteristics of biodegradable poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) with 1,3:2,4-dibenzylidene-D-sorbitol (DBS) prepared by melt blending were investigated in this study. DBS was added as a diluent to PLLA in the melted state, leading to the disentanglement of PLLA chains and the enhancement of PLLA mobility. Upon cooling from the melt, the formation of self-assembled DBS nanofibrils enhanced the hardness and stiffness of PLLA. DBS nanofibrils were measured with diameters of 40–50 nm, as observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition, the thermal and crystallization behaviors of PLLA were significantly influenced by the addition of DBS. The ordered and regular α-crystals of PLLA were favored when DBS was added. The crystallization rates of PLLA are tunable by varying the isothermal crystallization temperatures of PLLA and the amounts of DBS. The presence of DBS interfered with the crystallization rates of PLLA. However, at higher crystallization temperatures of PLLA, DBS facilitated the formation of nuclei, leading to an increase in the crystallization rates of PLLA. Furthermore, the hydrophilicity of PLLA was significantly improved by a further increase in DBS concentration.


PLLA Self-assembled Nanofibrils Hydrophilicity 



We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan.


  1. 1.
    Lasprilla JRA, Martinez GAR, Lunelli BH, Jardini AL, Filho RM (2012) Poly-lactic acid synthesis for application in biomedical devices — A review. Biotechnol Adv 30:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luckachan GE, Pillai CKS (2011) Biodegradable Polymers- A Review on Recent Trends and Emerging Perspectives. J Polym Environ 19:637–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martin O, Averous L (2001) Poly(lactic acid): plasticization and properties of biodegradable multiphase systems. Polymer 42:6209–6219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mujica-Garciaab A, Hooshmandc S, Skrifvarsd M, Kennyab JM, Oksmanc K, Peponi L (2016) Poly(lactic acid) melt-spun fibers reinforced with functionalized cellulose nanocrystals. RSC Adv 6:9221–9231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibrahim N, Jollands M, Parthasarathy R (2017) IOP Conf series. Mater Sci Eng 191:012005Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yamane H, Sasai K (2003) Effect of the addition of poly(d-lactic acid) on the thermal property of poly(l-lactic acid). Polymer 44:2569–2575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li H, Huneault MA (2007) Effect of nucleation and plasticization on the crystallization of poly(lactic acid). Polymer 48:6855–6866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ray SS (2012). Acc Chem Res 45:1710–1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sodergard A, Stolt M (2002) Properties of lactic acid based polymers and their correlation with composition. Prog Polym Sci 27:1123–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lai W-C, Wu C-H (2010) Studies on the self-assembly of neat DBS and DBS/PPG organogels. J Appl Polym Sci 115:1113–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diehn KK, Oh H, Hashemipour R, Weiss RG, Raghavan SR (2014) Insights into organogelation and its kinetics from Hansen solubility parameters. Toward a priori predictions of molecular gelation. Soft Matter 10:2632–2640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cornwell DJ, Daubney OJ, Smith DK (2015) Photopatterned Multidomain Gels: Multi-Component Self-Assembled Hydrogels Based on Partially Self-Sorting 1,3:2,4-Dibenzylidene-d-sorbitol Derivatives. J Am Chem Soc 137:15486–15492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilder EA, Hall CK, Khan SA, Spontak RJ (2003) Effects of Composition and Matrix Polarity on Network Development in Organogels of Poly(ethylene glycol) and Dibenzylidene Sorbitol. Langmuir 19:6004–6013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lai W-C, Chen C-C (2014) Novel poly(ethylene glycol) gel electrolytes prepared using self-assembled 1,3:2,4-dibenzylidene-d-sorbitol. Soft Matter 10:312–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schamper T, Jablon M, Randhawa MH, Senatore A, Warren JD (1986). J Soc Cosmetic Chem 37:225–231Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Okesola BO, Vieira VMP, Cornwell DJ, Whitelaw NK, Smith DK (2015) 1,3:2,4-Dibenzylidene-d-sorbitol (DBS) and its derivatives – efficient, versatile and industrially-relevant low-molecular-weight gelators with over 100 years of history and a bright future. Soft Matter 11:4768–4787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lai W-C, Tseng S-C (2009) Novel polymeric nanocomposites and porous materials prepared using organogels. Nanotechnology 20:475606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang K, Zhou CJ, Tang CY, Zhang Q, Du RN, Fu Q, Li L (2009) Rheologically determined negative influence of increasing nucleating agent content on the crystallization of isotactic polypropylene. Polymer 50:696–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Feng Y, Jin X, Hay JN (1998) Effect of nucleating agent addition on crystallization of isotactic polypropylene. J Appl Polym Sci 69:2089–2095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kristiansen M, Werner M, Tervoort T, Smith P (2003) The Binary System Isotactic Polypropylene/Bis(3,4-dimethylbenzylidene)sorbitol: Phase Behavior, Nucleation, and Optical Properties. Macromolecules 36:5150–5156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lai W-C (2011) The effect of self-assembled nanofibrils on the morphology and microstructure of poly(l-lactic acid). Soft Matter 7:3844–3851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lai W-C (2011) Thermal Behavior and Crystal Structure of Poly(l-lactic acid) with 1,3:2,4-Dibenzylidene-d-sorbitol. J Phys Chem B 115:11029–11037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    You J, Yu W, Zhou C (2014) Accelerated Crystallization of Poly(lactic acid): Synergistic Effect of Poly(ethylene glycol), Dibenzylidene Sorbitol, and Long-Chain Branching. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:1097–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fujiwara T, Kimura Y (2002) Macromolecular Organization of Poly(L-lactide)-block-Polyoxyethylene into Bio-Inspired Nano-Architectures. Macromol Biosci 2:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tsuji H, Muramatsu H (2001) Blends of aliphatic polyesters. IV. Morphology, swelling behavior, and surface and bulk properties of blends from hydrophobic poly(L-lactide) and hydrophilic poly(vinyl alcohol). J Appl Polym Sci 81:2151–2160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Howe EJ, Okesola BO, Smith DK (2015) Self-assembled sorbitol-derived supramolecular hydrogels for the controlled encapsulation and release of active pharmaceutical ingredients. Chem Commun 51:7451–7454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smith TL, Masilamani D (1994) The Mechanism of Action of Sugar Acetals as Nucleating Agents for Polypropylene. Macromolecules 27:3147–3155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gu SY, Zhang K, Ren J, Zhan H (2008) Melt rheology of polylactide/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) blends. Carbohydr Polym 74:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Awal A, Rana M, Sain M (2015) Thermorheological and mechanical properties of cellulose reinforced PLA bio-composites. Mechanics of Materials Part A 80:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sim HG, Ahn KH, Lee SJ (2003) Large amplitude oscillatory shear behavior of complex fluids investigated by a network model: a guideline for classification. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 112:237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang J, Tashiro K, Tsuji H, Domb AJ (2008) Disorder-to-Order Phase Transition and Multiple Melting Behavior of Poly(l-lactide) Investigated by Simultaneous Measurements of WAXD and DSC. Macromolecules 41:1352–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Avrami MJ (1941) Granulation, Phase Change, and Microstructure Kinetics of Phase Change. III. J Chem Phys 9:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Braun B, Dorgan JR, Hollingsworth LO (2012) Supra-Molecular EcoBioNanocomposites Based on Polylactide and Cellulosic Nanowhiskers: Synthesis and Properties. Biomacromolecules 13:2013–2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fujisawa S, Saito T, Kimura S, Iwata T, Isogai A (2014) Comparison of mechanical reinforcement effects of surface-modified cellulose nanofibrils and carbon nanotubes in PLLA composites. Compos Sci Technol 90:96–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wan C, Chen B (2012) Reinforcement and interphase of polymer/graphene oxide nanocomposites. J Mater Chem 22:3637–3646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wang C-H, Fan K-R, G-Ho H (2005) Enzymatic degradation of PLLA-PEOz-PLLA triblock copolymers. Biomaterials 26:2803–2811CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Polymer Society, Taipei 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Materials EngineeringTamkang UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan
  2. 2.Energy and Opto-Electronic Materials Research CenterTamkang UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations