Advertisement

Compatibility enhancement of silica and natural rubber compound using UVA-induced silane-grafted saponified skim natural rubber

  • Nattanee Dechnarong
  • Adun Nimpaiboon
  • Sirirat Kumarn
  • Pranee Phinyocheep
  • Jitladda Sakdapipanich
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 152 Downloads

Abstract

Silane coupling agents are potential reagents widely used to improve the compatibility between silica and less polar rubber, especially natural rubber (NR). Nevertheless, high temperature is generally required to generate the interaction between the components during the mixing process. Accordingly, an alternative method by grafting the silane coupling agent onto the rubber molecules would be a desirable approach to develop a compatibilizer for the silica-filled NR compound. In this work, skim NR was used as a starting material due to its linear structure. The optimal conditions of the grafting reaction were found to be 1 phr of an alkoxy silane and 5 phr of benzoyl peroxide under 8 min of UVA irradiation time. These conditions were applied for producing the rubber material used in the mixing process of STR 5L and silica. The cure characteristics, silica dispersion and mechanical properties of the rubber compounds were improved, suggesting that the modified rubber was an efficient material for increasing the compatibility between silica and NR.

Keywords

Skim natural rubber Silica Silane coupling agent UVA-induced grafting reaction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge for the financial support from the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) through IRG5780009 and the basic research grant: BRG5780002. The Center of Excellence for Innovation in Chemistry, Commission on Higher Education (PERCH-CIC) is also acknowledged. Sincere appreciation is extended to Thai Rubber Latex Co., Ltd. for kind support the NR latex.

Supplementary material

10965_2017_1420_MOESM1_ESM.docx (98 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 97 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Choi S-S, Nah C, Jo B-W (2003) Properties of natural rubber composites reinforced with silica or carbon black: influence of cure accelerator content and filler dispersion. Polym Int 52(8):1382–1389.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.1232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leblanc JL (2002) Rubber–filler interactions and rheological properties in filled compounds. Prog Polym Sci 27(4):627–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prasertsri S, Rattanasom N (2012) Fumed and precipitated silica reinforced natural rubber composites prepared from latex system: mechanical and dynamic properties. Polym Test 31(5):593–605.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choi S-S (2002) Influence of storage time and temperature and silane coupling agent on bound rubber formation in filled styrene–butadiene rubber compounds. Polym Test 21(2):201–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00071-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murakami K, Iio S, Ikeda Y, Ito H, Tosaka M, Kohjiya S (2003) Effect of silane-coupling agent on natural rubber filled with silica generated in situ. J Mater Sci 38(7):1447–1455.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022908211748 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sengloyluan K, Sahakaro K, Dierkes WK, Noordermeer JWM (2014) Silica-reinforced tire tread compounds compatibilized by using epoxidized natural rubber. Eur Polym J 51:69–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seo G, Park SM, Ha K, Choi KT, Hong CK, Kaang S (2010) Effectively reinforcing roles of the networked silica prepared using 3,3′-bis(triethoxysilylpropyl)tetrasulfide in the physical properties of SBR compounds. J Mater Sci 45(7):1897–1903.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-4175-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sae-oui P, Sirisinha C, Hatthapanit K, Thepsuwan U (2005) Comparison of reinforcing efficiency between Si-69 and Si-264 in an efficient vulcanization system. Polym Test 24(4):439–446.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sae-oui P, Thepsuwan U, Hatthapanit K (2004) Effect of curing system on reinforcing efficiency of silane coupling agent. Polym Test 23(4):397–403.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2003.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim K-J, White JL (2002) Silica surface modification using different aliphatic chain length silane coupling agents and their effects on silica agglomerate size and processability. Compos Interfaces 9(6):541–556.  https://doi.org/10.1163/15685540260494119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Theppradit T, Prasassarakich P, Poompradub S (2014) Surface modification of silica particles and its effects on cure and mechanical properties of the natural rubber composites. Mater Chem Phys 148(3):940–948.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stöber W, Fink A, Bohn E (1968) Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J Colloid Interface Sci 26(1):62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sahakaro K, Beraheng S (2008) Reinforcement of maleated natural rubber by precipitated silica. J Appl Polym Sci 109(6):3839–3848.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.28483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kawahara S, Kakubo T, Nishiyama N, Tanaka Y, Isono Y, Sakdapipanich JT (2000) Crystallization behavior and strength of natural rubber: skim rubber, deproteinized natural rubber, and pale crepe. J Appl Polym Sci 78(8):1510–1516.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4628(20001121)78:8<1510::AID-APP70>3.0.CO;2-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sakdapipanich JT, Nawamawat K, Kawahara S (2002) Characterization of the large and small rubber particles in fresh Hevea latex. Rubber Chem Technol 75(2):179–185.  https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3544971 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anancharungsuk W, Tanpantree S, Sruanganurak A, Tangboriboonrat P (2007) Surface modification of natural rubber film by UV-induced graft copolymerization with methyl methacrylate. J Appl Polym Sci 104(4):2270–2276.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.25661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoven VP, Chombanpaew K, Iwasaki Y, Tasakorn P (2009) Improving blood compatibility of natural rubber by UV-induced graft polymerization of hydrophilic monomers. J Appl Polym Sci 112(1):208–217.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.29408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nakason C, Kaesaman A, Yimwan N (2003) Preparation of graft copolymers from deproteinized and high ammonia concentrated natural rubber latices with methyl methacrylate. J Appl Polym Sci 87(1):68–75.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.11671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Amnuaypornsri S, Sakdapipanich J, Tanaka Y (2010) Highly purified natural rubber by saponificaion of latex: analysis of green and cured properties. J Appl Polym Sci 118(6):3524–3531.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.32699 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kongkaew C, Dokkhan C, Pattanawanidchai S, Chaikumpollert O, Loykulnant S (2012) Factors affecting creaming efficiency of bio-based polymers, vulcanization and mechanical properties of creamed skim rubber. Biomass Bioenergy 46:233–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.08.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saelao J, Phinyocheep P (2005) Influence of styrene on grafting efficiency of maleic anhydride onto natural rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 95(1):28–38.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20810 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tanaka Y (1989) Structure and biosynthesis mechanism of natural polyisoprene. Prog Polym Sci 14(3):339–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kochthongrasamee T, Prasassarakich P, Kiatkamjornwong S (2006) Effects of redox initiator on graft copolymerization of methyl methacrylate onto natural rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 101(4):2587–2601.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.23997 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wongthong P, Nakason C, Pan Q, Rempel GL, Kiatkamjornwong S (2013) Modification of deproteinized natural rubber via grafting polymerization with maleic anhydride. Eur Polym J 49(12):4035–4046.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kosmalska A, Zaborski M, Ślusarski L (2003) Adsorption of curatives and activity of silica toward elastomers. Macromol Symp 194(1):269–276.  https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.200390092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mullins L, Tobin NR (1957) Theoretical model for the elastic behavior of filler-reinforced vulcanized rubbers. Rubber Chem Technol 30(2):555–571.  https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3542705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nimpaiboon A, Amnuaypornsri S, Sakdapipanich J (2013) Influence of gel content on the physical properties of unfilled and carbon black filled natural rubber vulcanizates. Polym Test 32(6):1135–1144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saramolee P, Sahakaro K, Lopattananon N, Dierkes WK, Noordermeer JW (2015) Compatibilization of silica-filled natural rubber compounds by combined effects of functionalized low molecular weight rubber and silane. J Elastomers Plast.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0095244314568469
  29. 29.
    Payne AR, Whittaker RE (1971) Low strain dynamic properties of filled rubbers. Rubber Chem Technol 44(2):440–478.  https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3547375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meissner B (1974) Theory of bound rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 18(8):2483–2491.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1974.070180826 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pattanawanidchai S, Loykulnant S, Sae-oui P, Maneevas N, Sirisinha C (2014) Development of eco-friendly coupling agent for precipitated silica filled natural rubber compounds. Polym Test 34:58–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and Center of Excellence for Innovation in Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Institute of Molecular BiosciencesMahidol UniversityNakhon PathomThailand
  3. 3.Rubber Technology Research Centre (RTEC), Faculty of ScienceMahidol UniversityNakhon PathomThailand

Personalised recommendations