Chemico-physical characterization of hybrid composites based on hydroxyethyl methacrylate and nanosilica
- 110 Downloads
- 7 Citations
Abstract
Novel hydrogels are often designed to mimic the transport and mechanical properties of natural soft tissue such as ligaments, tendons, intervertebral discs, or to be exploited as scaffold for tissue engineering. Recently, novel hydrogels based on 2-hydroxylethyl methacrylate and fumed silica nanoparticles (5–25% w/w) were synthesized by our group and demonstrated to improve cell adhesion and proliferation. The chemico-physical properties and mechanical behaviour of these new polymers have been studied and are presented in this article. The swelling equilibria in water and water solutions were evaluated in relation to ionic strength and pH. The sorption kinetic estimated through gravimetric analysis showed a diffusive transport behaviour of the hybrid composite materials as of early stages of the process. The elastic modulus was evaluated by Dynamic-Mechanical Analyses and proved to increase with the filler content reaching values compatible with the mechanical characteristics of natural material. This result supports the possibility of future applications of the novel hybrid composite in several fields, in dentistry as dental filling or in systems for the controlled released of drugs.
Keywords
Nanostructured materials Poly(hydroxylethylmethacrylate) Fumed silica Swelling behaviourNotes
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge Mr Davide Apicella for the collaboration in the DMA analysis.
References
- 1.Sun Y-M, Lee H-L (1996) Sorption/desorption properties of water vapour in poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate): 1.Experimental and preliminary analysis. Polymer (Guildf) 37(17):3915–3919. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(96)00222-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Kudela V (1985–1990) In “Encyclopedia of Polymer science and engineering”, Mark HF, Bikales NN, Overberger CG, Menges G, Kroschwitz JI (Eds) 7, 2nd edition. Wiley, New York, pp 783–807Google Scholar
- 3.Corkhill PH, Jolly AM, Chiong O (1987) Ng., Tighe C. B. Synthetic hydrogels: 1. Hydroxyalkyl acrylate and methacrylate copolymers—water binding studie. Polymer (Guildf) 28:1758–176. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(87)90021-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Bruck SD (1973) Aspects of three types of hydrogels for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res 7(5):387–404. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820070503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Ferreira L, Vidal MM, Gil MH (2000) Evaluation of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) gels as drug delivery systems at different pH values. Int J Pharm 194:169–180. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00375-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Gehrke SH, Biren D, Hopkins JJ (1994) Evidence for fickian water transport in initially glassy poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 6(4):375–390. doi: 10.1163/156856295X00067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Brazel CS, Peppas NA (2000) Modeling of drug release from swellable polymers. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 49:275–286. doi: 10.1016/S0939-6411(99)00058-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Schiraldi C, D, ’ Agostino A, Oliva A, Flamma F, De Rosa A, Apicella A, Aversa R, De Rosa M (2004) Development of hybrid materials based on hydroxyethylmethacrylate as supports for improving cell adhesion and proliferation. Biomaterials 25(17):3645–3653. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Raghavan SR, Khan SA (1995) Shear-induced microstructural changes in flocculated suspensions of fumed silica. Society of Rheology 39(6):1311–1325Google Scholar
- 10.Sadhan CJ, Sachin J (2001) Dispersion of nanofillers in high performance polymers using reactive solvents as processing aids. Polymer (Guildf) 42:6897–6905. doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00175-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Rentsch H, Mackert W (1996) Dental material with inorganic filler particles coated with polymerizable binder. Eur Pat Appl EP 732099 A2 19960918Google Scholar
- 12.Watanabe T, Miyazaki M, Inage H, Kurokawa H (2004) determination of elastic modulus of the components at dentin-rsin interface using the ultrasonic device. Dent Mater J 23(3):361–367Google Scholar