Impact-Modified Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/Polyethylene-Octene Elastomer Blends
- 154 Downloads
- 19 Citations
Abstract
Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) is a low cost, high performance thermoplastics. However, its shortcoming is that it has poor impact-strength properties. High-impact strength PET was prepared using polyethylene-octene elastomer (POE) grafted with a toughener, maleic anhydride. The effect of the maleate compatibilizer on the interfacial adhesion and impact-strength properties of PET/POE blends was investigated through impact testing, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation, and rheological behavior analysis. The results showed that unmodified POE has hardly any contribution to the toughness of PET, whereas maleic anhydride-grafted POE (POE-g-MA) significantly improves the compatibility of POE and PET. The size of POE-g-MA particles in the PET matrix were sharply reduced due to interaction between POE-g-MA and PET during melt processing.
Keywords
compatibilizer elastomer interfacial tension PET toughnessPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.T. G. Fox, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 1, 123 (1956). Google Scholar
- 2.M. Gordon and J. S. Taylor, J. Appl. Chem., 2, 90 (1952). Google Scholar
- 3.A. F. Yee, Polym. Eng. Sci., 17, 213 (1977). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.R. P. Kambour and S. A. Smith, J. Polym. Sci. Phys. Ed., 20, 2069 (1982). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.A. E. Yee and M. A. Maxwell, Makromol. Sci. Phys., 17, 543 (1980). Google Scholar
- 6.E. A. Joseph, M. D. Lorenz, J. W. Barlow and D. R. Paul, Polymer, 23, 112 (1982). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.J. D. Keitz, J. W. Barlow and D. R. Paul, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 29, 3131 (1984). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.M. T. Shaw, Polym. Eng. Sci., 22, 115 (1982). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.J. W. Barlow and D. R. Paul, Polym. Eng. Sci., 24, 520 (1984). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.R. J. Roe, J. Chem. Phys., 62, 490 (1975). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.K. Min, J. White and J. F. Fellers, Polym. Eng. Sci., 24, 1327 (1984). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.S. J. Hobbs, M. E. J. Dekkers and V. H. Waokins, Polymer, 29, 1598 (1988). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.S. Wu, Polymer, 26, 1855 (1985). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.S. Wu, Polym. Eng. Sci., 27, 335 (1987). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.F. M. B. Coutinho and I. P. Ferreira, Polym. Testing, 13, 25 (1994). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.T. Nagy, G. Samay and J. L. White, Int. Polym. Sci. Technol., 22, T/40 (1995). Google Scholar
- 17.Z.-Z. Yu, Y.-C. Ou and Y.-P. Feng, Acta Polym. Sinica, 5, 566 (1995). Google Scholar
- 18.C. Jun, Y. Wei, L. Zhengying and H. Rui, J. Mater. Sci., 39, 4049 (2004). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.A. Gonzalez-Montiel, H. Keskkula and D. R. Paul, Polymer, 36, 4605 (1995). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.I. Abu-Isa, C. B. Jaynes and J. F. O’gara, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 59, 1957 (1996). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.T. L. Cart’e and A. Mont, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 48, 611 (1993). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.M. Penco, M. A. Pastorino, E. Occhiello, F. Garbassi, R. Braglia and G. Giannotta, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Google Scholar
- 23.L. Marquez, D. E. Gambus, M. P. Romero-Rato and M. A. Sabino, SPE ANTEC ‘99, 3903 (1999). Google Scholar
- 24.S. Wu, Polymer Interface and Adhesion, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982. Google Scholar