Neighborhood Profiles and Associations with Coping Behaviors among Low-Income Youth
- 63 Downloads
Extant research has typically examined neighborhood characteristics in isolation using variable-centered approaches; however, there is reason to believe that perceptions of the neighborhood environment influence each other, requiring the use of person-centered approaches to study these relationships. The present study sought to determine profiles of youth that differ in their perceptions of their neighborhoods and objective neighborhood characteristics, and whether these profiles are associated with youth coping. Participants were low-income, African American youth (N= 733; 51.0% female, M age = 18.76 years, SD = 1.71) from a metropolitan city who were originally recruited for the Youth Opportunity program in Baltimore, Maryland. A latent profile analysis was conducted which included self-reported neighborhood social cohesion, collective efficacy, disorder, violence, and disadvantage derived from census data. Coping behaviors, specifically positive cognitive restructuring, problem-focused coping, distraction strategies, and avoidant behaviors were assessed via self-reported questionnaires. Four neighborhood profiles were identified: highest disorder (20.0%); highest violence/highest disadvantage (5.2%); high violence (26.6%); and highest cohesion/lowest disorder (48.2%). Individuals in the highest violence/highest disadvantage profile reported higher positive cognitive restructuring and problem-focused coping than the other profiles. These findings warrant an investigation into the individual assets and contextual resources that may contribute to more positive coping behaviors among youth in more violent and disadvantaged neighborhoods, which has the potential to improve resilient outcomes among youth in similar at-risk settings.
KeywordsNeighborhood risk and protective factors Latent profiles Urban youth Coping
We thank all study participants, in addition to D.T., the principal investigator of the current project.
J.R. developed the research questions, conducted the analyses, and led the writing of the paper; T.P. helped generate the research questions and study conceptualization; R.S. created the community disadvantage index, was involved in interpreting the results, and helped edit the manuscript; B.R. and K.G. provided their statistical and methodological expertise in latent profile modeling and aided in selecting the model that best fit the data; A.M., M.S., and D.F. provided their expertise in examining neighborhood-level influences on youth’s mental health and offered feedback on the manuscript conceptualization; A.L. led the collection of data and provided guidance on the research framing and writing; D.T. conceived of and supervised the study as the principal investigator on the grant supporting the researchers’ time on this project and assisted in editing the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding for the implementation of the Healthy Minds at Work intervention came from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the Jacob and Hilda Blaustein Foundation, The Abell Foundation, the Leonard and Helen R. Stulman Foundation, The Annie E. Casey Foundation, Aaron Straus and Lillie Straus Foundation, and the France-Merrick Foundation. The research portion of Healthy Minds at Work was developed as the core research project of the Johns Hopkins Center for Adolescent Health, a prevention research center funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (grant no. 1-U48-DP-000040).
Data Sharing and Declaration
This manuscript’s data will not be deposited. However, data from the current study can be obtained from the Principal Investigator, D.T.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health (IRB #NA 00021362) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: using the BCH method in mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. Mplus Webnotes: No. 21, 1–22.Google Scholar
- Bennett, G. G., Merritt, M. M., Sollers, III, J. J., Edwards, C. L., Whitfield, K. E., Brandon, D. T., & Tucker, R. D. (2004). Stress, coping, and health outcomes among African-Americans: a review of the John Henryism hypothesis. Psychology and Health, 19(3), 617–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/0887044042000193505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Booth, J. M., Teixeira, S., Zuberi, A., & Wallace, J. M. (2018). Barrios, ghettos, and residential racial composition: examining the racial makeup of neighborhood profiles and their relationship to self-rated health. Social Science Research, 69, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.10.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boxer, P., Sheffield, A. S., Terranova, A. M., Kithakye, M., Savoy, S. C., & Mcfaul, A. F. (2008). Coping with exposure to violence: relations to emotional symptoms and aggression in three urban samples. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 17, 881–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-008-9196-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brenner, A. B., Zimmerman, M. A., Bauermeister, J. A., & Caldwell, C. H. (2013). Neighborhood context and perceptions of stress over time: an ecological model of neighborhood stressors and intrapersonal and interpersonal resources. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 544–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-013-9571-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Browning, C. R., Soller, B., Gardner, M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2013). “Feeling disorder” as a comparative and contingent process: gender, neighborhood conditions, and adolescent mental health. Child and Adolescent Health and Well-Being, 54, 296–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146513498510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J. K., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A. H., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 87–127. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.127.1.87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Epstein, S. (1983). Natural healing process of the mind: graded stress innoculation as an inherent coping mechanism. In M. D. & Y. M. (Eds), Stress reduction and prevention (pp. 39–66). New York, NY, US: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Gambone, M. A., Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2002). Finding out what matters for youth: testing key links in a community action framework for youth development. Philadelphia: Youth Development Strategies, Inc., and Institute for Research and Reform in Education.Google Scholar
- Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hippensteel, C. L., Sadler, R. C., Milam, A. J., Nelson, V., & Furr-Holden, C. D. (2018). Using zoning as a public health tool to reduce oversaturation of alcohol outlets: an examination of the effects of the new “300 foot rule” on packaged goods stores in a mid-Atlantic city. Prevention Science, 20, 1–11.Google Scholar
- Kliewer, W., Cunningham, J. N., Diehl, R., Parrish, K. A., Walker, J. A., Atiyeh, C., & Mejia, R. (2004). Violence exposure and adjustment in inner-city youth: child and caregiver emotion regulation skill, caregiver-child relationship quality, and neighborhood cohesion as protective factors. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Markowitz, F. E., Bellair, P. E., Liska, A. E., & Liu, J. (2001). Extending social disorganization theory: modeling the relationships between cohesion, disorder, and fear. Criminology, 39, 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00924.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Masyn, K. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture model. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods, Vol. 2: Statistical Analysis. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide. Eighth Edn Los Angeles, CA, US: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 443–478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sonenstein, F. L., Marshall, B. D., & Tandon, D. (2011). Employment and training programs: a context for reaching out of school youth with mental health and other health programs. Adolescent Medicine: State of the Art Reviews (AM: STARS), 22(3), 441–457.Google Scholar
- Tandon, S. D., Latimore, A. D., Clay, E., Mitchell, L., Tucker, M., & Sonenstein, F. L. (2014). Depression outcomes associated with an intervention implemented in employment training programs for low-income adolescents and young adults. JAMA Psychiatry, 72, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar