Similarities and Differences in Adolescents’ Organized and Civic Activity Networks across Rural and Non-Rural Communities
- 36 Downloads
Youth are often involved in multiple organized and civic activities simultaneously, resulting in complex patterns or “networks” of participation. Little research has examined the network structure of adolescents’ organized and civic participation and whether these networks vary across communities. Examining activity networks may help identify specific forms of participation that are more widely and strongly connected with other activities, and may thus provide a gateway for becoming multiply involved. Youth (N= 902; Mage = 15.90; 55.7% female) from a rural (n= 476) and non-rural (n= 426) community completed measures assessing engagement in 25 civic and organized activities. Network analysis indicated that activities in the rural community had greater network density relative to the non-rural community. Volunteering to clean up the neighborhood was most central to both networks. Church attendance and community sports were more central for the rural network, whereas protesting and school arts were more central for the non-rural network. These findings suggest that volunteer activities may serve as a “hub” for organized and civic activity participation and highlight similarities and differences in the co-occurrence of activities across two distinct communities.
B.O. conceived of the study, participated in acquisition of the data, performed statistical analyses and interpretation of the data, and drafted the manuscript; A.M. participated in acquisition of the data, helped interpret the data, and drafted the manuscript; L.A. helped to draft the manuscript and interpret the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data Sharing and Declaration
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Barker, R. G., & Gump, P. V. (1964). Big school, small school: High school size and student behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (1999). UCINET 5 for windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
- Ferris, K. A., Oosterhoff, B., & Metzger, A. (2013). Organized activity involvement among rural youth: gender differences in associations between activity type and developmental outcomes. Journal of Research in Rural Education (Online), 28, 1–15.Google Scholar
- Fischer, C. S. (1982). To dwell among friends: personal networks in town and city. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Hardré, P. L., Sullivan, D. W., & Crowson, H. M. (2009). Student characteristics and motivation in rural high schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24. Retrieved from http://www.jrre.psu.edu/articles/24-16.pdf.
- Jones, P. J. (2017). Networktools: tools for identifying important nodes in networks. R package documentation. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/networktools/networktools.pdf.
- Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdottir, S., & Smith, L. M. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 17–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neal, J. W., & Neal, Z. P. (2013). Nested or networked? Future directions for ecological systems theory. Social Development, 22, 722–737.Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
- Townsend, M., Moore, J., & Mahoney, M. (2002). Playing their part: the role of physical activity and sport in sustaining the health and well being of small rural communities. International Electronic Journal of Rural and Remote Health Research, Education, Practice and Policy, 2, 1–6.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau (2010). 2010 urban and rural classification and urban area criteria. http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/ua/urban-rural-2010.html.
- Vandell, D. L., Larson, R. W., Mahoney, J. L., & Watts, T. W. (2015). Children’s organized activities. In M. H. Bornstein & T. Leventhal (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Vol. 4: Ecological settings and processes in developmental systems. 7th ed (pp. 305–344). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Zaff, J. F., Hart, D., Flanagan, C. A., Youniss, J., Levine, P., Lerner, R. M., Lamb, M. E., & Freund, A. M. (2010). Developing civic engagement within a civic context. In: The handbook of life-span development. Social and emotional development, Vol. 2 (pp. 590–630). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar