Advertisement

Similarities and Differences in Adolescents’ Organized and Civic Activity Networks across Rural and Non-Rural Communities

  • Benjamin OosterhoffEmail author
  • Aaron Metzger
  • Lauren Alvis
Empirical Research
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Youth are often involved in multiple organized and civic activities simultaneously, resulting in complex patterns or “networks” of participation. Little research has examined the network structure of adolescents’ organized and civic participation and whether these networks vary across communities. Examining activity networks may help identify specific forms of participation that are more widely and strongly connected with other activities, and may thus provide a gateway for becoming multiply involved. Youth (N= 902; Mage = 15.90; 55.7% female) from a rural (n= 476) and non-rural (n= 426) community completed measures assessing engagement in 25 civic and organized activities. Network analysis indicated that activities in the rural community had greater network density relative to the non-rural community. Volunteering to clean up the neighborhood was most central to both networks. Church attendance and community sports were more central for the rural network, whereas protesting and school arts were more central for the non-rural network. These findings suggest that volunteer activities may serve as a “hub” for organized and civic activity participation and highlight similarities and differences in the co-occurrence of activities across two distinct communities.

Notes

Authors’ Contributions

B.O. conceived of the study, participated in acquisition of the data, performed statistical analyses and interpretation of the data, and drafted the manuscript; A.M. participated in acquisition of the data, helped interpret the data, and drafted the manuscript; L.A. helped to draft the manuscript and interpret the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data Sharing and Declaration

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Barker, R. G., & Gump, P. V. (1964). Big school, small school: High school size and student behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bellet, B. W., Jones, P. J., Neimeyer, R. A., & McNally, R. J. (2018). Bereavement outcomes as causal systems: a network analysis of the co-occurrence of complicated grief and posttraumatic growth. Clinical Psychological Science, 6, 797–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohnert, A., Fredricks, J., & Randall, E. (2010). Capturing unique dimensions of youth organized activity involvement theoretical and methodological considerations. Review of Educational Research, 80, 576–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (1999). UCINET 5 for windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  5. Bowers, E. P., Geldhof, G. J., Johnson, S. K., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2014). Special issue introduction: thriving across the adolescent years: a view of the issues. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 859–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darling, N. (2005). Participation in extracurricular activities and adolescent adjustment: cross-sectional and longitudinal findings. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 493–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Denault, A. S., & Poulin, F. (2009). Intensity and breadth of participation in organized activities during the adolescent years: multiple associations with youth outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1199–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eder, D., & Kinney, D. A. (1995). The effect of middle school extra curricular activities on adolescents’ popularity and peer status. Youth & Society, 26, 298–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elder, G. H., & Conger, R. D. (2000). Children of the land: adversity and success in rural America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., & Borsboom, D. (2012). qgraph: network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Epskamp, S., & Fried, E. I. (2018). A tutorial on estimating regularized psychological networks. Psychological Methods, 23, 617–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferris, K. A., Oosterhoff, B., & Metzger, A. (2013). Organized activity involvement among rural youth: gender differences in associations between activity type and developmental outcomes. Journal of Research in Rural Education (Online), 28, 1–15.Google Scholar
  13. Fischer, C. S. (1982). To dwell among friends: personal networks in town and city. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010). Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software, 33, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hardré, P. L., Sullivan, D. W., & Crowson, H. M. (2009). Student characteristics and motivation in rural high schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24. Retrieved from http://www.jrre.psu.edu/articles/24-16.pdf.
  17. Jones, P. J. (2017). Networktools: tools for identifying important nodes in networks. R package documentation. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/networktools/networktools.pdf.
  18. Kay, T., & Bradbury, S. (2009). Youth sport volunteering: developing social capital? Sport, Education and Society, 14, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krause, N. (2009). Church-based volunteering, providing informal support at church, and self-rated health in late life. Journal of Aging and Health, 21, 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdottir, S., & Smith, L. M. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 17–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levinson, M., Sherrod, L. R., Torney-Purta, J., & Flanagan, C. (2010). The civic empowerment gap: defining the problem and locating solutions. In: Handbook of civic engagement in youth (pp. 331–361). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ludden, A. B. (2011). Engagement in school and community civic activities among rural adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 1254–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McNally, R. J. (2016). Can network analysis transform psychopathology? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 86, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Metzger, A., Alvis, L. M., Oosterhoff, B., Babskie, E., Syvertsen, A., & Wray-Lake, L. (2018). The intersection of emotional and sociocognitive competencies with civic engagement in middle childhood and adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1663–1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Metzger, A., Crean, H. F., & Forbes-Jones, E. L. (2009). Patterns of organized activity participation in urban, early adolescents: associations with academic achievement, problem behaviors, and perceived adult support. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 426–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Metzger, A., & Smetana, J. G. (2009). Adolescent civic and political engagement: associations between domain‐specific judgments and behavior. Child Development, 80, 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neal, J. W., & Neal, Z. P. (2013). Nested or networked? Future directions for ecological systems theory. Social Development, 22, 722–737.Google Scholar
  28. Oosterhoff, B., Ferris, K. A., & Metzger, A. (2017a). Adolescents’ sociopolitical values in the context of organized activity involvement. Youth & Society, 49, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oosterhoff, B., Ferris, K. A., Palmer, C. A., & Metzger, A. (2017b). Longitudinal associations among adolescents’ organized activity involvement and sociopolitical values. Social Development, 26, 846–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oosterhoff, B., Kaplow, J. B., Layne, C. M., & Pynoos, R. (2018). Civilization and its discontented: links between youth victimization, beliefs about government, and political participation across seven American presidencies. American Psychologist, 73, 230–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Overton, W. F. (2013). A new paradigm for developmental science: relationism and relational-developmental systems. Applied Developmental Science, 17, 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. R Core Team (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
  33. Robinaugh, D. J., Millner, A. J., & McNally, R. J. (2016). Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shelly, B. (2011). Bonding, bridging, and boundary breaking: the civic lessons of high school student activities. Journal of Political Science Education, 7, 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Townsend, M., Moore, J., & Mahoney, M. (2002). Playing their part: the role of physical activity and sport in sustaining the health and well being of small rural communities. International Electronic Journal of Rural and Remote Health Research, Education, Practice and Policy, 2, 1–6.Google Scholar
  36. U.S. Census Bureau (2010). 2010 urban and rural classification and urban area criteria. http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/ua/urban-rural-2010.html.
  37. Vandell, D. L., Larson, R. W., Mahoney, J. L., & Watts, T. W. (2015). Children’s organized activities. In M. H. Bornstein & T. Leventhal (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Vol. 4: Ecological settings and processes in developmental systems. 7th ed (pp. 305–344). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Wray-Lake, L., Metzger, A., & Syvertsen, A. K. (2017). Testing multidimensional models of youth civic engagement: model comparisons, measurement invariance, and age differences. Applied Developmental Science, 21, 266–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zaff, J. F., Hart, D., Flanagan, C. A., Youniss, J., Levine, P., Lerner, R. M., Lamb, M. E., & Freund, A. M. (2010). Developing civic engagement within a civic context. In: The handbook of life-span development. Social and emotional development, Vol. 2 (pp. 590–630). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Zaff, J. F., Moore, K. A., Papillo, A. R., & Williams, S. (2003). Implications of extracurricular activity participation during adolescence on positive outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 599–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMontana State UniversityBozemanUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyWest Virginia UniversityMorgantonUSA
  3. 3.Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children’s HospitalHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations