Advertisement

Creating Supportive Contexts for Early Adolescents during the First Year of Middle School: Impact of a Developmentally Responsive Multi-Component Intervention

  • Molly DawesEmail author
  • Thomas Farmer
  • Jill Hamm
  • David Lee
  • Kate Norwalk
  • Brittany Sterrett
  • Kerrylin Lambert
Empirical Research
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

The transition to middle school is recognized as a period of increased risk for students’ adjustment difficulties across the academic, behavioral, and social domains, underscoring the need for developmentally responsive interventions that address these potential vulnerabilities. This study examined the impact of a multi-component intervention on students’ perceived adjustment during the first year of middle school using a cluster randomized controlled trial design. A total of 24 metropolitan schools (12 intervention), 220 teachers (122 intervention), and 2925 students (1537 intervention) participated. Teachers in intervention schools received training and consultation in the Behavioral, Academic, and Social Engagement (BASE) classroom management model. Significant intervention effects, moderated by students’ gender, race/ethnicity, and economic status, were found for self-reported social anxiety, defiance, willingness to protect peers being bullied, and emotional problems. The results suggest that teachers trained in the BASE model were better able to create supportive classroom contexts during the middle school transition which promoted positive adjustment for particular students. This study stresses the importance of using developmentally appropriate strategies across correlated domains to reduce adjustment difficulties during the transition to middle school.

Keywords

Early adolescence School-based intervention Middle schoolers Socio-emotional adjustment Behavioral adjustment Classroom management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the students, teachers, and schools who participated in this study. We also thank the members of the research team involved in data collection and processing. This research was supported by a grant from the Institute of Education Sciences (R305A120812). The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors’ and do not represent the granting agency.

Authors’ Contributions

M.D. participated in study conception, performed the statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript; T.F. conceived of the study, participated in the design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript; J.H. conceived of the study, participated in the design and coordination, advised on the methodology and statistical analyses, and helped draft the manuscript; D.L. conceived of the study, participated in the design and coordination, and advised on the manuscript; K.N. participated in the study design and coordination and helped draft the manuscript; B.S. assisted in study conception and helped draft the manuscript; K.L. coordinated data processing, assisted with statistical analyses, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported in part by grants from the Institute of Educational Sciences (R305A120812) awarded to Thomas W. Farmer, Jill V. Hamm, and David Lee (PIs). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the granting agency.

Data Sharing and Declaration

The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in the current study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/ or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained for all participants in the study.

References

  1. Aloe, A. M., Shisler, S. M., Norris, B. D., Nickerson, A. B., & Rinker, T. W. (2014). A multivariate meta-analysis of student misbehavior and teacher burnout. Educational Research Review, 12, 30–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderman, E. M., & Mueller, C. (2010). Middle school transitions and early adolescent development. In J. L. Meece & J. S. Eccles (Eds), Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development (pp. 198–215). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bellmore, A., Villarreal, V. M., & Ho, A. Y. (2011). Staying cool across the first year of middle school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 776–785.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9590-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Birmaher, B., Brent, D. A., Chiappetta, L., Bridge, J., Monga, S., & Baugher, M. (1999). Psychometric properties of the screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED): a replication study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 1230–1236.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199910000-00011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birmaher, B., Khetarpal, S., Brent, D., Cully, M., Balach, L., & Kaufman, J., et al. (1997). The screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED): scale construction and psychometric characteristics. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 545–553.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199704000-00018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1996). Foreward. In R. B. Cairns, G. H. Elder & E. J. Costello (Eds), Developmental science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, J. L., Jones, S. M., LaRusso, M. D., & Aber, J. L. (2010). Improving classroom quality: Teacher influences and experimental impacts of the 4Rs program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 153.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cappella, E., Hughes, D. L., & McCormick, M. P. (2017). The hidden role of teachers: child and classroom predictors of change in interracial friendships. Journal of Early Adolescence, 37, 1093–1124.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616648454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chung, H., Elias, M., & Schneider, K. (1998). Patterns of individual adjustment changes during middle school transition. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 83–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(97)00051-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corcoran, R. P., Cheung, A. C., Kim, E., & Xie, C. (2018). Effective universal school-based social and emotional learning programs for improving academic achievement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Educational Research Review, 25, 56–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dijkstra, J. K., & Gest, S. D. (2015). Peer norm salience for academic achievement, prosocial behavior, and bullying: implications for adolescent school experiences. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35, 79–96.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614524303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & MacIver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: the impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 225–241.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farmer, T. W., Farmer, E. M. Z., & Brooks, D. S. (2010). Recasting the ecological and developmental roots of intervention for students with emotional and behavior problems: the promise of strength-based perspectives. Exceptionality, 18, 53–57.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09362831003673051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farmer, T. W., Gatzke-Kopp, L. M., Lee, D. L., Dawes, M., & Talbott, E. (2016). Research and policy on disability: linking special education to developmental science. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 138–145.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farmer, T. W., Hamm, J. V., Lee, D., Lane, K. L., Sutherland, K. S., Hall, C. M., et al. (2013). Conceptual foundations and components of a contextual intervention to promote student engagement during early adolescence: the supporting early adolescent learning and social success (SEALS) model. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 23, 115–139.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2013.785181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farmer, T. W., Hamm, J. V., Leung, M.-C., Lambert, K., & Gravelle, M. (2011). Early adolescent peer ecologies in rural communities: bullying in schools that do and do not have a transition during the middle grades. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 1106–1117.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9684-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Farmer, T. W., Hamm, J. V., Petrin, R. A., Robertson, D. L., Murray, R. A., Meece, J. L., & Brooks, D. S. (2010). Supporting early adolescent learning and social strengths: promoting productive contexts for students at-risk for EBD during the transition to middle school. Exceptionality, 18, 94–106.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09362831003673192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farmer, T. W., Reinke, W., & Brooks, D. S. (2014). Managing classrooms and challenging behavior: theoretical considerations and critical issues. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22, 67–73.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426614522693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farmer, T. W., Talbott, B., Dawes, M., Huber, H. B., Brooks, D. S., & Powers, E. (2018). Social dynamics management: what is it and why is it important for intervention? Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 26, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426617752139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Farrell, A. D., Henry, D. B., & Bettencourt, A. (2013). Methodological challenges examining subgroup differences: examples from universal school-based youth violence prevention trials. Prevention Science, 14, 121–133.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0200-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 97, 115–121.  https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.3.115-121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flannery, K. B., Fenning, P., Kato, M. M., & McIntosh, K. (2014). Effects of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports and fidelity of implementation on problem behavior in high schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 111–124.  https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000039.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodenow, C.(1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 79–90.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(199301)30:13.0.CO;2-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodman, R., & Scott, S. (1999). Comparing the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and the child behavior checklist: is small beautiful? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 17–24.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022658222914.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gregory, A., Hafen, C. A., Ruzek, E., Mikami, A. Y., Allen, J. P., & Pianta, R. C. (2016). Closing the racial discipline gap in classrooms by changing teacher practice. School Psychology Review, 45, 171–191.  https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR45-2.171-191.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Gregory, A., & Ripski, M. B. (2008). Adolescent trust in teachers: implications for behavior in the high school classroom. School Psychology Review, 37, 337–355.Google Scholar
  29. Gregory, A., Skiba, R., & Noguera, P. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: two sides of the same coin. Educational Researcher, 39, 59–68.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09357621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grills-Taquechel, A. E., Norton, P., & Ollendick, T. H. (2010). A longitudinal examination of factors predicting anxiety during the transition to middle school. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 23, 493–513.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800903494127.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Hagborg, W. J. (1998). An investigation of a brief measure of school membership. Adolescence, 33, 461–468.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hale, W. W., Crocetti, E., Raaijmakers, Q. A., & Meeus, W. H. (2011). A meta‐analysis of the cross‐cultural psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 80–90.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02285.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamm, J. V., & Faircloth, B. S. (2005). Peer context of mathematics classroom belonging. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 345–366.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431605276932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., Dadisman, K., Gravelle, M., & Murray, R. A. (2011). Teachers’ attunement to students’ peer group affiliations as a source of improved student experiences of the school social-affective context following the middle school transition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 267–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., Lambert, K., & Gravelle, M. (2014). Enhancing peer cultures of academic effort and achievement in early adolescence: promotive effects of the SEALS intervention. Developmental Psychology, 50, 216–228.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032979.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., Robertson, D. R., Dadisman, K., Meece, J. L., & Song, S. Y. (2010). Effects of a developmentally-based intervention with teachers, on Native American and White early adolescents in rural schools. Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 343–377.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970903548038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hamm, J. V., Hoffman, A., & Farmer, T. W. (2012). Peer cultures of academic success in adolescence: why they matter and what teachers can do to promote them. In A. Ryan & G. Ladd (Eds), Peer relationships and adjustment at school. New York, NY: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Hamm, J. V., Schmid, L., Farmer, T. W., & Locke, B. L. (2011). The influence of injunctive and descriptive peer group norms on the academic adjustment of rural early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 41–73.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610384486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hendrickx, M. M., Mainhard, M. T., Boor-Klip, H. J., Cillessen, A. H., & Brekelmans, M. (2016). Social dynamics in the classroom: teacher support and conflict and the peer ecology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 30–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hsieh, P., Acee, T., Chung, W.-H., Hsieh, Y.-P., Kim, H., Thomas, G. D., et al. (2005). Is educational intervention research on the decline? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 523–529.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ingersoll, R. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage?. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/LimitsPolicy-RI-09-2003.pdf.
  42. Kӓrnӓ, A., Voeten, M., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts: Bystanders’ behavior moderate the effects of risk factors on victimization. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 261–282.  https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kiefer, S. M., & Wang, J. H. (2016). Associations of coolness and social goals with aggression and engagement during adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 44, 52–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kollerová, L., Yanagida, T., Mazzone, A., Soukup, P., & Strohmeier, D. (2018). “They think that I should defend”: effects of peer and teacher injunctive norms on defending victimized classmates in early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(11), 2424–2439.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0918-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. La Paro, K. M., Pianta, R. C., & Stuhlman, M. (2004). The classroom assessment scoring system: findings from the prekindergarten year. The Elementary School Journal, 104, 409–426.  https://doi.org/10.1086/499760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2290157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Magnusson, D., & Cairns, R. B. (1996). Developmental science: principles and illustrations. In R. B. Cairns, G. H. Elder, Jr. & J. Costello (Eds), Developmental Science (pp. 7–30). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Masten, A. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2010). Developmental cascades. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 491–495.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Midgley, C., Maehr, M., Hruda, L., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K., et al. (2000). Manual for patterns of adaptive learning. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  50. Mikami, A. Y., Ruzek, E. A., Hafen, C. A., Gregory, A., & Allen, J. P. (2017). Perceptions of relatedness with classroom peers promote adolescents’ behavioral engagement and achievement in secondary school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 2341–2354.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0724-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Molloy, L. E., Moore, J. E., Trail, J., Van Epps, J. J., & Hopfer, S. (2013). Understanding real world implementation quality and “active ingredients” of PBIS. Prevention Science, 14, 593–605.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0343-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Mueller, C. M., Hofrnann, V., Begert, T., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2018). Peer influence on disruptive classroom behavior depends on teachers’ instructional practice. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 99–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Norwalk, K. E., Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., & Barnes, K. L. (2016). Improving the school context of early adolescence through teacher attunement to victimization: effects on school belonging. Journal of Early Adolescence, 36, 989–1009.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431615590230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2000). A longitudinal study of bullying, victimization, and peer affiliation during the transition from primary school to middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 699–725.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037003699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roeser, R. W., & Peck, S. C. (2003). Patterns and pathways of educational achievement across adolescence: A holistic-developmental perspective. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 101, 39–62.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ryan, A. M. (2011). Peer relationships and academic adjustment during early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 5–12.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610387605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ryan, A. M., Shim, S. S., & Makara, K. A. (2013). Changes in academic adjustment and relational self-worth across the transition to middle school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1372–1384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9984-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sainio, M., Veenstra, R., Huitsing, G., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). Victims and their defenders: a dyadic approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 144–151.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410378068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: a review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Salmivalli, C. (2014). Participant roles in bullying: how can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions? Theory Into Practice, 53(4), 286–292.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Song, S. Y. (2005). Protective peer ecology scale—middle school. Unpublished Measure. New Haven, CT: Yale Child Study Center.Google Scholar
  63. StataCorp. (2015). Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  64. Swearer, S. M., & Espelage, D. L. (2004). Introduction: a social-ecological framework of bullying among youth. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds), Bullying in American schools: a social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 1–12). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  65. U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights. (2012). Helping to ensure equal access to education. http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/ocr/report-to-president-2009-12.pdf
  66. Vernon-Feagans, L., Gallagher, K. C., & Kainz, K. (2010). The transition to school in rural America. In J. L. Meece & J. S. Eccles (Eds), Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development (pp. 163–184). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Voelkl, K. E. (1996). Measuring students’ identification with school. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 760–770.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056005003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vollet, J. W., Kindermann, T. A., & Skinner, E. A. (2017). In peer matters, teachers matter: Peer group influences on students’ engagement depend on teacher involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 635–652.  https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83, 877–895.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Waschbusch, D. A., Breaux, R. P., & Babinski, D. E. (2018). School-based interventions for aggression and defiance in youth: a framework for evidence-based practice. School Mental Health, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-018-9269-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wentzel, K. R., Muenks, K., McNeish, D., & Russell, S. (2017). Peer and teacher supports in relation to motivation and effort: a multi-level study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 32–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wentzel, K. R., Muenks, K., McNeish, D., & Russell, S. (2018). Emotional support, social goals, and classroom behavior: a multilevel, multisite study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110, 611–627.  https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Looking inside the classroom: A study of K-12 mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity of PittsburgPittsburgUSA
  3. 3.School of EducationThe University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  4. 4.College of EducationThe Pennsylvania State UniversityState CollegeUSA
  5. 5.Department of PsychologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  6. 6.School of EducationVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations