Social and Emotional Adjustment Across Aggressor/Victim Subgroups: Are Aggressive-Victims Distinct?
Despite prior studies supporting the existence of “aggressive-victims”, it remains unclear if they possess unique risk factors from adolescents who are mostly aggressive or victimized. The present study sought to determine whether aggressive-victims differ from adolescents with distinct patterns of involvement in aggression and victimization in their social and emotional adjustment. Secondary analyses were conducted on baseline data from 984 seventh grade students (54% female) from three schools. Most participants identified their race as White (49%) or African American (19%), with 24% identifying as Latino/a. Latent class analysis identified four subgroups: predominant-aggressors (25%), predominant-victims (17%), aggressive-victims (12%), and limited-involvement (47%). The findings did not provide evidence of unique social-emotional characteristics of aggressive-victims that were not accounted for by their involvement in both aggression and victimization. Further evidence of unique differences in risk factors is needed to support targeted interventions for aggressive-victims.
KeywordsAggressive-victims Aggression Adolescence Emotion regulation Social competence
This research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant R01MH081166-01A1 awarded to W.K. and S.J.L. We thank the research staff, schools, teachers, and students who participated in this study.
K.O. conceived of the study, completed the statistical analyses, and participated in the design and interpretation of the data and drafting of the manuscript; A.F. participated in the conceptualization of the study, design and interpretation of the data, and drafting of the manuscript; W.K. and S.L. provided the data for use in this study and contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.
Data Sharing and Declaration
This manuscript’s data will not be deposited.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Virginia Commonwealth University and Temple University. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of Virginia Commonwealth University and Temple University and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments of comparable ethical standards.
Written informed consent was provided by the maternal caregiver and assent was provided by the adolescent before initiating the data collection.
- Achenbach, T., & Rescorla, L. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles: an integrated system of multi-informant assessment. Burlington, VT: Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.Google Scholar
- Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary second model. http://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote21.pdf.
- Card, N., Stucky, B., Sawalani, G., & Little, T. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta‐analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.Google Scholar
- Farrell, A. D., Bettencourt, A. F., & Mehari, K. R. (2018a). Beliefs about fighting and their relations to urban adolescents’ frequency of aggression and victimization: evaluation of the Beliefs About Fighting Scale. Journal of Early Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618791297.
- Farrell, A., & Camou, S. (2006). School-based interventions for youth violence prevention. In J. R. Lutzker (Ed.), Preventing violence: research and evidence-based intervention strategies (pp. 125–145). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Felner, R. D., Favazza, A., Shim, M., Brand, S., Gu, K., & Noonan, N. (2001). Whole school improvement and restructuring as prevention and promotion: lessons from STEP and the project on high performance learning communities. Journal of School Psychology, 39(2), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00057-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goldbach, J. T., Sterzing, P. R., & Stuart, M. J. (2018). Challenging conventions of bullying thresholds: exploring differences between low and high levels of bully-only, victim-only, and bully-victim roles. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(3), 586–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0775-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hightower, A., Work, W., Cowen, E., Lotyczewski, B., Spinell, A., & Rohrbeck, C. (1986). The teacher–child rating scale: a brief objective measure of elementary children’s school problem behaviors and competencies. School Psychology Review, 15(3), 393–409.Google Scholar
- Kovacs, M. (1992). Children’s depression inventory manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
- Lepore, S. J. & Smyth, J. (Eds) (2002). The writing cure: how expressive writing influences health and well-being. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10451-000.
- Masyn, K. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In Little, T. D. & Nathan, P. E. (Eds), The oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology, Vol. 2: statistical analysis (pp. 551–611). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2018). Mplus user’s guide. 8th ed Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M. D., Pilla, R., Ruan, W., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(16), 2094–2100. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.16.2094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Oxford, England: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
- Perry, D., Perry, L., & Kennedy, E. (1992). Conflict and the development of antisocial behavior. In C. U. Shantz & W. W. Hartup (Eds), Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp. 301–329). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Riediger, M., & Klipker, K. (2014). Emotion regulation in adolescence. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation, 2nd ed (pp. 187–202). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3 (pp. 571–645). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, D., Proctor, L., & Chien, D. (2001). The aggressive-victim of bullying: emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds), Peer harassment in school: the plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 147–174). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Serico, J., NeMoyer, A., Goldstein, N., Houck, M., & Leff, S. (2018). A methodological study of order effects in reporting relational aggression experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518760008.
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.Google Scholar