Derisive Parenting Fosters Dysregulated Anger in Adolescent Children and Subsequent Difficulties with Peers
Bullying and victimization are manifest in the peer social world, but have origins in the home. Uncertainty surrounds the mechanisms that convey problems between these settings. The present study describes the indirect transmission of hostility and coercion from parents to adolescent children through emotional dysregulation. In this model, derisive parenting—behaviors that demean or belittle children—fosters dysregulated anger, which precipitates peer difficulties. A total of 1409 participants (48% female; Mage = 13.4 years at the outset) were followed across secondary school (Grades 7–9) for three consecutive years. The results indicated that derisive parenting in Grade 7 was associated with increases in adolescent dysregulated anger from Grade 7 to 8, which, in turn, was associated with increases in bullying and victimization from Grade 8 to 9. The findings suggest that parents who are derisive, have children who struggle with emotional regulation and, ultimately, with constructive peer relationships.
KeywordsParenting Emotion dysregulation Bullying Victimization
D.D. participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and prepared the manuscript. B.L. assisted in the conception of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and assisted in the preparation of the manuscript; O.V. participated in the design, and helped perform the statistical analysis and interpretation of the data, and helped draft the manuscript; H.S. conceived of the study, participated in the design and coordination of the study, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This study was funded by The Research Council for Working Life and Social Science of Sweden (grant number 2004-1981). Support for the preparation of this manuscript was provided to Brett Laursen by the US National Science Foundation (grant numbers 0909733 and 162094), and by the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (grant HD096457).
Data Sharing and Declaration
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was part of a larger project entitled “utsatta ungdomar i utsatta omraden” (translation: vulnerable young people in vulnerable areas). The original project was approved by the regional ethics board in Uppsala (protocol # EPN 2007/094). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants of this original project were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Uppsala, Sweden, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Alsaker, F. D., & Brunner, A. (1999). Switzerland. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano & P. Slee (Eds), The nature of school bullying: a cross-national perspective (pp. 250–263). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bretherton, I., & Munholland, K. A. (1999). Internal working models in attachment relationships: a construct revisited. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 89–111). New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Cantone, E., Piras, A. P., Vellante, M., Preti, A., Danielsdóttir, S., D’Aloja, E., & Bhugra, D. (2015). Interventions on bullying and cyberbullying in schools: a systematic review. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, 11, 58–76. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901511010058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Craig, W., Harel-Fisch, Y., Fogel-Grinvald, H., Dostaler, S., Hetland, J., & Simons-Morton, B., the HBSC Bullying Writing Group. (2009). A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. International Journal of Public Health, 54, 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-5413-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2010). Marital conflict and children: An emotional security perspective. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Dodge, K. A. (1991). The structure and function of reactive and proactive aggression. In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 201–218). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? School Psychology Review, 32, 365–384.Google Scholar
- Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2012). Mediation models for developmental data. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little & N. A. Card (Eds), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 291–310). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kahen, V., Katz, L. F., & Gottman, J. M. (1994). Linkages between parent-child interaction and conversations of friends. Social Development, 3, 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1994.tb00043.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kawabata, Y., Alink, L. R. A., Tseng, W.-L., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Crick, N. R. (2011). Maternal and paternal parenting styles associated with relational aggression in children and adolescents: A conceptual analysis and meta-analytic review. Developmental Review, 31, 240–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kerr, M., Stattin, H., Biesecker, G., & Ferrer-Wreder, L. (2003). Relationshipswith parents and peers in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner, M. A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 6. Developmental psychology (pp. 395–422). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Laursen, B., & Collins, W. A. (2009) Parent-child relatiospring2018@DE!nships during adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg, (Eds), Handbook of adolescent psychology: contextual influences on adolescent development (pp. 3–42). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
- Little, T. D. (2013). Methodology in the social sciences. Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide. 8th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
- Persson, A., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2004). Why a leisure context is linked to normbreaking for some girls and not others: personality characteristics and parent–child relations as explanations. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.06.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Perry, D., Hodges, E., & Egan, S. (2001). Determinants of chronic victimization by peers: A review of new model of family influence. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds), Peer harassment in school: the plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 73–104). New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Quetsch, L. B., Wallace, N. M., McNeil, C. B., & Gentzler, A. L. (2018). Emotion regulation in families of children with behavior problems and nonclinical comparisons. Journal of Child and Family Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1081-9
- Rodkin, P. C., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2003). Bullies and victims in the peer ecology: Four questions for psychologists and school professionals. School Psychology Review, 32, 384–400.Google Scholar
- Roth, G., Assor, A., Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The emotional and academic consequences of parental conditional regard: comparing conditional positive regard, conditional negative regard, and autonomy support as parenting practices. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1119–1142. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salmivalli, C., & Peets, K. (2018) Bullying and victimization. In W.M. Bukowski & B. Laursen, K. H. Rubin, (Eds). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. (Vol. 2).Google Scholar
- Schwartz, D., Proctor, I., & Chien, D. (2001). The aggressive victim of bullying: Emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 147–174). Boston, MA: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Stuart, J., Fondacaro, M., Miller, S. A., Brown, V., & Brank, E. M. (2008). Procedural justice in family conflict resolution and deviant peer group involvement among adolescents: The mediating influence of peer conflict. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 674–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9194-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A. J., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2005). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: a comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41, 672–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16184.108.40.2062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Widom, C. S. & Wilson, H. W. (2015) Intergenerational transmission of violence. In J. Lindert & I. Levav (Eds), Violence and mental health: its manifold faces. New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8999-8_2.