Advertisement

Social Ties Cut Both Ways: Self-Harm and Adolescent Peer Networks

  • Molly CopelandEmail author
  • Sonja E. Siennick
  • Mark E. Feinberg
  • James Moody
  • Daniel T. Ragan
Empirical Research

Abstract

Peers play an important role in adolescence, a time when self-harm arises as a major health risk, but little is known about the social networks of adolescents who cut. Peer network positions can affect mental distress related to cutting or provide direct social motivations for self-harm. This study uses PROSPER survey data from U.S. high school students (n = 11,160, 48% male, grades 11 and 12), finding that social networks predict self-cutting net of demographics and depressive symptoms. In final models, bridging peers predicts higher self-cutting, while claiming more friends predicts lower cutting for boys. The findings suggest that researchers and practitioners should consider peer networks both a beneficial resource and source of risk associated with cutting for teens and recognize the sociostructural contexts of self-harm for adolescents more broadly.

Keywords

Self-harm Social networks Adolescence Peer networks 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of working groups at Duke and PSU for their helpful comments and acknowledge the contributions of study participants, families, and the PROSPER staff to making this project possible.

Authors’ Contributions

M.C. contributed to study design, conducted analyses, wrote the manuscript and contributed to revisions; J.M. generated the networks; S.E.S., M.E.F. and J.M. contributed to study design, interpretation, and revisions; D.T.R. participated in revisions of analyses and draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research is supported by grants from the W. T. Grant Foundation (8316) and National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 A018225) to D. Wayne Osgood. The analyses used data from PROSPER, a project directed by R. L. Spoth, funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA013709) and co-funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

Data sharing and Declaration

Due to the sensitive nature of data collected, the dataset is not available for public use at this time.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The procurement of the data required for this study was approved by the Iowa State University and Pennsylvania State University institutional review boards.

Informed Consent

All youth and families were informed about and consented to participate in the data collection for this project.

Supplementary material

10964_2019_1011_MOESM1_ESM.docx (32 kb)
Supplementary Information

References

  1. Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (2011). The Tender Cut. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, T., Martin, G., Hasking, P., & Page, A. (2014). Predictors of onset for non-suicidal self-injury within a school-based sample of adolescents. Prevention Science, 15(6), 850–859.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0412-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakken, N. W., & Gunter, W. D. (2012). Self-cutting and suicidal ideation among adolescents: Gender differences in the causes and correlates of self-injury. Deviant Behavior, 33(5), 339–356.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2011.584054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bearman, P. S., & Moody, J. (2004). Suicide and friendships among American adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 94(1), 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentley, K. H., Nock, M. K., & Barlow, D. H. (2014). The four-function model of nonsuicidal self-injury: key directions for future research. Clinical Psychological Science, 2(5), 638–656.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702613514563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carboni, I., & Gilman, R. (2012). Brokers at risk: gender differences in the effects of structural position on social stress and life satisfaction. Group Dynamics, 16(3), 218–230.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheadle, J. E., & Goosby, B. J. (2012). The small-school friendship dynamics of adolescent depressive symptoms. Society and Mental Health, 2(2), 99–119.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869312445211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christoffersen, M. N., Mohl, B., DePanfilis, D., & Vammen, K. S. (2015). Non-suicidal self-injury—Does social support make a difference? An epidemiological investigation of a Danish national sample. Child Abuse and Neglect, 44, 106–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.10.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Claes, L., Houben, A., Vandereycken, W., Bijttebier, P., & Muehlenkamp, J. (2010). Brief report: the association between non-suicidal self-injury, self-concept and acquaintance with self-injurious peers in a sample of adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 33(5), 775–778.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.10.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cotterell, J. (2007). Social Networks in Youth & Adolescence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Douvan, E. (1983). Commentary: Theoretical perspectives on peer sssociation. In J. L. Epstein & N. Karweit (Eds.), Friends in School: Patterns of Selection and Influence in Secondary Schools (pp. 63–69). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Falci, C., & McNeely, C. (2009). Too many friends: social integration, network cohesion and adolescent depressive symptoms. Social Forces, 87(4), 2031–2062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faris, R., & Felmlee, D. (2011). Status struggles: network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 48–73.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410396196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fortune, S. A., & Hawton, K. (2005). Deliberate self-harm in children and adolescents: a research update. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 18, 401–406.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.yco.0000172059.55778.c9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geulayov, G., Casey, D., McDonald, K. C., Foster, P., Pritchard, K., Wells, C., & Hawton, K. (2018). Incidence of suicide, hospital-presenting non-fatal self-harm, and community-occurring non-fatal self-harm in adolescents in England (the iceberg model of self-harm): a retrospective study. The Lancet Psychiatry, 5(2), 167–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30478-9.
  16. Giletta, M., Burk, W. J., Scholte, R. H. J., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Prinstein, M. J. (2013). Direct and indirect peer socialization of adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 450–463.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guan, W., & Kamo, Y. (2016). Contextualizing depressive contagion: a multilevel network approach. Society and Mental Health, 6(2), 129–145.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869315619657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamza, C. A., & Willoughby, T. (2014). A longitudinal person-centered examination of nonsuicidal self-injury among university students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(4), 671–685.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9991-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawton, K., Bergen, H., Kapur, N., Cooper, J., Steeg, S., Ness, J., & Waters, K. (2012). Repetition of self-harm and suicide following self-harm in children and adolescents: findings from the Multicentre Study of Self-harm in England. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 53(12), 1212–1219.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02559.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hawton, K., Harriss, L., & Rodham, K. (2010). How adolescents who cut themselves differ from those who take overdoses. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19(6), 513–523.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-009-0065-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heilbron, N., & Prinstein, M. J. (2008). Peer Influence and adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a theoretical review of mechanisms and moderators. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 12(4), 169–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appsy.2008.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jarvi, S., Jackson, B., Swenson, L., & Crawford, H. (2013). The impact of social contagion on non-suicidal self-injury: a review of the literature. Archives of Suicide Research, 17(1), 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2013.748404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kornienko, O., Clemans, K. H., Out, D., & Granger, D. A. (2013). Friendship network position and salivary cortisol levels. Social Neuroscience, 8(4), 385–396.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2013.795500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kornienko, O., & Santos, C. E. (2014). The effects of friendship network popularity on depressive symptoms during early adolescence: moderation by fear of negative evaluation and gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(4), 541–553.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9979-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. La Greca, A. M., & Harrison, H. M. (2005). Adolescent peer relations, friendships, and romantic relationships: do they predict social anxiety and eepression. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(1), 49–61.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laukkanen, E., Rissanen, M. L., Honkalampi, K., Kylmä, J., Tolmunen, T., & Hintikka, J. (2009). The prevalence of self-cutting and other self-harm among 13- to 18-year-old Finnish adolescents. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 44(1), 23–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-008-0398-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McFarland, D. A., Moody, J., Diehl, D., Smith, J. A., & Thomas, R. J. (2014). Network ecology and adolescent social structure. American Sociological Review, 79(6), 1088–1121.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414554001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nixon, M. K., & Heath, N. L. (2009). Introduction to self-Injury in adolescence. In M. K. Nixon & N. L. Heath (Eds.), Self-Injury in Youth: The Essential Guide to Assessment and Intervention (pp. 1–6) New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  29. Nock, M. K. (2010). Self-injury. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 339–363.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pickering, T. A., Wyman, P. A., Schmeelk-Cone, K., Hartley, C., Valente, T. W., Pisani, A. R., & LoMurray, M. (2018). Diffusion of a peer-led suicide preventive intervention through school-based student peer and adult networks. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00598.
  31. Prinstein, M. J., & Wang, S. S. (2005). False consensus and adolescent peer contagion: examining discrepancies between perceptions and actual reported levels of friends’ deviant and health risk behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 293–306.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-3566-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reynolds, A. D., & Crea, T. M. (2015). Peer influence processes for youth delinquency and depression. Journal of Adolescence, 43, 83–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rose, A. J., Carlson, W., & Waller, E. M. (2007). Prospective associations of co-rumination with friendship and emotional adjustment: considering the socioemotional trade-offs of co-rumination. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1019–1031.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98–131.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, J. A., Moody, J., & Morgan, J. H. (2017). Network sampling coverage II: the effect of non-random missing data on network measurement. Social Networks, 48, 78–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spoth, R., Greenberg, M., Bierman, K., & Redmond, C. (2004). PROSPER Community-University Partnership Model for Public Education Systems: Capacity-Building for Evidence-Based, Competence-Building Prevention. Prevention Science, 5(1), 31–39.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000013979.52796.8b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., Feinberg, M., & Schainker, L. (2013). PROSPER community-university partnership delivery system effects on substance misuse through 6 1/2 years past baseline from a cluster randomized controlled intervention trial. Preventive medicine, 56(3–4), 190–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tuisku, V., Kiviruusu, O., Pelkonen, M., Karlsson, L., Strandholm, T., & Marttunen, M. (2014). Depressed adolescents as young adults—predictors of suicide attempt and non-suicidal self-injury during an 8-year follow-up. Journal of Affective Disorders, 152–154(1), 313–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.09.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ueno, K. (2005). The effects of friendship networks on adolescent depressive symptoms. Social Science Research, 34(3), 484–510.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Umberson, D., Crosnoe, R., & Reczek, C. (2010). Social relationships and health behavior across life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 139–157.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120011.Social.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walsh, B. W. (2006). Treating Self Injury: A Practical Guide. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wasserman, S. S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. You, J., Lin, M. P., Fu, K., & Leung, F. (2013). The best friend and friendship group influence on adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(6), 993–1004.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9734-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. You, J., Zheng, C., Lin, M. P., & Leung, F. (2016). Peer group impulsivity moderated the individual-level relationship between depressive symptoms and adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury. Journal of Adolescence, 47, 90–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Young, R., Sweeting, H., & West, P. (2006). Prevalence of deliberate self harm and attempted suicide within contemporary Goth youth subculture: longitudinal cohort study. BMJ, 332, 1058–1061.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38790.495544.7C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zahn-Waxler, C., Klimes-Dougan, B., & Slattery, M. J. (2000). Internalizing problems of childhood and adolescence: prospects, pitfalls, and progress in understanding the development of anxiety and depression. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 443–466. http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0954579400003102.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.College of Criminology and Criminal JusticeFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  3. 3.Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research CenterPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  4. 4.King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  5. 5.Department of SociologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations