Advertisement

It’s Lonely at the Top: Adolescent Students’ Peer-perceived Popularity and Self-perceived Social Contentment

  • Sharlyn M. FergusonEmail author
  • Allison M. RyanEmail author
Empirical Research

Abstract

Popularity is highly desired among youth, often more so than academic achievement or friendship. Recent evidence suggests being known as “popular” among peers (perceived popularity) may be more detrimental during adolescence than being widely well-liked (sociometric popularity). Thus, this study sought to better understand how two dimensions of popularity (perceived and sociometric) may contribute to adolescents’ own perceptions of satisfaction and happiness regarding their social life at school, and hypothesized that “being popular” would have a more complex (and curvilinear) association with adolescents’ social contentment than previously considered by linear models. Adolescents’ peer popularity and self-perceived social contentment were examined as both linear and curvilinear associations along each status continuum in a series of hierarchical regressions. Participants were 767 7th-grade students from two middle schools in the Midwest (52% female, 46% White, 45% African American). Perceived and sociometric popularity were assessed via peer nominations (“most popular” and “liked the most”, respectively). Self-reported social satisfaction, best friendship quality, social self-concept, and school belonging were assessed as aspects of social contentment. The results indicated that both high and low levels of perceived popularity, as well as high and low levels of sociometric popularity, predicted lower perceptions of social satisfaction, poorer best friendship quality, and lower social self-concept than youth with moderate levels of either status. Implications to promote adolescents’ psychosocial well-being by targeting popularity’s disproportionate desirability among youth are discussed.

Keywords

Adolescence Popularity Loneliness Social satisfaction Curvilinear Social contentment 

Notes

Authors’ Contributions

S.M.F. conceived the study, designed the study, conducted the statistical analyses, drafted the manuscript and revised the manuscript; A.M.R. secured IRB, collected the data, participated in the design and coordination of the study and revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data Sharing and Declaration

This manuscript’s data will not be deposited.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. Rutgers: University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045), 1034–1037.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., & McFarland, C. F. (2006). Leaders and followers in adolescent close friendships: Susceptibility to peer influence as a predictor of peer pressure, risky behavior, and depression. Development & Psychopathology, 18(1), 155–172.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., McFarland, F. C., Marsh, P., & McElhaney, K. B. (2005). The two faces of adolescents’ success with peers: Adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Development, 76(3), 747–760.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, J. P., Schad, M. M., Oudekerk, B., & Chango, J. (2014). What ever happened to the “cool” kids? Long‐term sequelae of early adolescent pseudo mature behavior.Child Development, 85(5), 1866–1880.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Anastasi, A. (1984). Reciprocal relations between cognitive and affective development with implications for sex differences. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Psychology and gender: Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 1–35). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  7. Asher, S. R., Hymel, S., & Renshaw, P. D. (1984). Loneliness in children. Child Development, 55(4), 1456–1464.Google Scholar
  8. Asher, S. R., & Wheeler, V. A. (1985). Children’s loneliness: a comparison of rejected and neglected peer status. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(4), 500–505.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Audley-Piotrowski, S., Singer, A., & Patterson, M. (2015). The role of the teacher in children’s peer relations: Making the invisible hand intentional. Translational Issues in Psychological Sciences, 1, 192–200.Google Scholar
  10. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Berndt, T. J. (1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents. Developmental Psychology, 15(6), 608–616.Google Scholar
  12. Brendgen, M., Markiewicz, D., Doyle, A. B., & Bukowski, W. M. (2001). The relations between friendship quality, ranked-friendship preference, and adolescents behavior with their friends. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(3), 395–415.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, B. B., Eicher, S. A., & Petrie, S. (1986). The importance of peer group (“crowd”) affiliation in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 9(1), 73–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bukowski, W. M., Hoza, B., & Boivin, M. (1993). Popularity, friendship, and emotional adjustment during early adolescence. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1993(60), 23–37.Google Scholar
  15. Bukowski, W. M., Pizzamiglio, M. T., Newcomb, A. F., & Hoza, B. (1996). Popularity as an affordance for friendship: The link between group and dyadic experience. Social Development, 5(2), 189–202.Google Scholar
  16. Cacioppo, S., Grippo, A. J., London, S., Goossens, L., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2015). Loneliness: Clinical import and interventions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 238–249.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Chambliss, J., Muller, D., Hulnick, R., & Wood, M. (1978). Relationships between self-concept, self-esteem, popularity, and social judgments of junior high school students. The Journal of Psychology, 98(1), 91–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bellmore, A. D. (2011). Social skills and social competence in interactions with peers. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), The Wiley‐Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Social Development. 2nd ed (pp. 393–412). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75(1), 147–163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cillessen, A. H. N., & van den Berg, Y. H. M. (2012). Popularity and school adjustment. In A. Ryan & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 135–164). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children’s social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29(3), 261–282.Google Scholar
  23. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 121–132.Google Scholar
  24. Crick, N. R., & Ladd, G. W. (1993). Children’s perceptions of their peer experiences: Attributions, loneliness, social anxiety, and social avoidance. Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 244–254.Google Scholar
  25. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 325–346.Google Scholar
  26. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58(3), 154–165.Google Scholar
  28. Farmer, T. W., Lines, M. M., & Hamm, J. V. (2011). Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children’s peer experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 247–256.Google Scholar
  29. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.) London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Gest, S. D., Madill, R. A., Zadzora, K. M., Miller, A. M., & Rodkin, P. C. (2014). Teacher management of elementary classroom social dynamics: Associations with changes in student adjustment. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22(2), 107–118.Google Scholar
  31. Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30(1), 79–90.Google Scholar
  32. Goswick, R. A., & Jones, W. H. (1981). Loneliness, self-concept, and adjustment. The Journal of Psychology, 107(2), 237–240.Google Scholar
  33. Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., Dadisman, K., Gravelle, M., & Murray, A. R. (2011). Teachers’ attunement to students’ peer group affiliations as a source of improved student experiences of the school social–affective context following the middle school transition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 267–277.Google Scholar
  34. Harter, S. (1990). Developmental differences in the nature of self-representations: Implications for the understanding, assessment, and treatment of maladaptive behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14(2), 113–142.Google Scholar
  35. Harter, S. (1998). The development of self-representations. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development. 5th ed (pp. 553–617). New York: Wiley. (Editor-in-Chief).Google Scholar
  36. Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67(1), 1–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), 279–309.Google Scholar
  38. Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Card, N. A. (2008). The myth of the alpha male: A new look at dominance-related beliefs and behaviors among adolescent males and females. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(1), 76–88.Google Scholar
  39. Heilbron, N., & Prinstein, M. J. (2008). A review and reconceptualization of social aggression: Adaptive and maladaptive correlates. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(4), 176–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Juvonen, J (1997). Peer relations. In: G. C. Bear, K. M. Minke, A. Thomas, (eds.) Children’s needs II: Development, problems, and alternatives. (pp. 65–74). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  41. Juvonen, J. (2006). Sense of belonging, social bonds, and school functioning. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 655–674). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Juvonen, J. (2007). Reforming middle schools: Focus on continuity, social connectedness, and engagement. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 197–208.Google Scholar
  43. Juvonen, J., Graham, S., & Schuster, M. A. (2003). Bullying among young adolescents: The strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112(6), 1231–1237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2005). The rejected and the bullied: lessons about social misfits from developmental psychology. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Sydney Symposium of Social Psychology series. The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 155–170). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  45. Juvonen, J., Le, V., Kaganoff, T., Augustine, C., & Constant, L. (2004). Focus on the wonder years: Challenges facing the American middle school. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  46. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kupersmidt, J. B. & Dodge, K. A. (Eds.) (2004). Decade of behavior. Children’s peer relations: From development to intervention. Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  48. Kurdek, L. A., & Krile, D. (1982). A developmental analysis of the relation between peer acceptance and both interpersonal understanding and perceived social self-competence. Child Development, 53, 1485–1491.Google Scholar
  49. LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 635–647.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130–147.Google Scholar
  51. Levin, J., & Madfis, E. (2009). Mass murder at school and cumulative strain: A sequential model. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(9), 1227–1245.Google Scholar
  52. Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  53. Lord, S. E., Eccles, J. S., & McCarthy, K. A. (1994). Surviving the junior high school transition family processes and self-perceptions as protective and risk factors. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 162–199.Google Scholar
  54. Molden, D. C., & Maner, J. K. (2013). How and when social exclusion motivates social reconnection. In C. N. Dewall (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social exclusion (pp. 121–131). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Margalit, M. (2010). Lonely children and adolescents: Self-perceptions, social exclusion, and hope. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  56. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.Google Scholar
  57. Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18(1), 49–74.Google Scholar
  58. Meijs, N., Cillessen, A. H., Scholte, R. H., Segers, E., & Spijkerman, R. (2010). Social intelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(1), 62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Milyavskaya, M., & Koestner, R. (2011). Psychological needs, motivation, and well-being: A test of self-determination theory across multiple domains. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(3), 387–391.Google Scholar
  60. Narr, R. K., Allen, J. P., Tan, J. S., & Loeb, E. L. (2017). Close friendship strength and broader peer group desirability as differential predictors of adult mental health. Child Development  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12905
  61. Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 611–621.Google Scholar
  62. Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125–144.Google Scholar
  63. Patterson, C. J., Kupersmidt, J. B., & Griesler, P. C. (1990). Children’s perceptions of self and of relationships with others as a function of sociometric status. Child Development, 61(5), 1335–1349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Perkins, H. W., & Craig, D. W. (2006). A successful social norms campaign to reduce alcohol misuse among college student-athletes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67(6), 880–889.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Prinstein, M. (2017). Popular: The power of likability in a status-obsessed world. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
  66. Prinstein, M., & Cillessen, A. H. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), 310–342.Google Scholar
  67. Prinstein, M. J., Choukas-Bradley, S. C., Helms, S. W., Brechwald, W. A., & Rancourt, D. (2011). High peer popularity longitudinally predicts adolescent health risk behavior, or does it?: An examination of linear and quadratic associations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36(9), 980–990.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Rodkin, P. C. (2011). Bullying–and the power of peers. Educational Leadership, 69(1), 10–16.Google Scholar
  70. Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 14–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Rodkin, P. C., & Roisman, G. I. (2010). Antecedents and correlates of the popular-aggressive phenomenon in elementary school. Child Development, 81(3), 837–850.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Rose, A. J. (2002). Co–rumination in the friendships of girls and boys. Child Development, 73(6), 1830–1843.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98–131.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Rose, A. J., & Swenson, L. P. (2009). Do perceived popular adolescents who aggress against others experience emotional adjustment problems themselves? Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 868–872.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 378–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In: W. Damon, R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.), & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed.) (pp. 571–645). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  77. Ryan, A. M., & Shim, S. S. (2008). An exploration of young adolescents’ social achievement goals and social adjustment in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 672–687.Google Scholar
  78. Ryan, A. M., & Shin, H. (2018). Peers, academics, and teachers. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. 2nd ed (pp. 639–656). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  79. Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2006). Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(4), 305–314.Google Scholar
  80. Schwartz, D., & Gorman, A. H. (2011). The high price of high status: Popularity as a mechanism of risk. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 245–270). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  81. Schwartz, D., Gorman, A. H., Duong, M. T., & Nakamoto, J. (2008). Peer relationships and academic achievement as interacting predictors of depressive symptoms during middle childhood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117(2), 289–299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Steinberg, L. (2014). Age of opportunity: Lessons from the new science of adolescence. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  83. Stoltz, S., Cillessen, A. H., van den Berg, Y. H., & Gommans, R. (2016). Popularity differentially predicts reactive and proactive aggression in early adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 42(1), 29–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Taylor, A. Z., & Graham, S. (2007). An examination of the relationship between achievement values and perceptions of barriers among low-SES African American and Latino students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 52–64.Google Scholar
  85. Topping, K., Bremner, W., & Holmes, E. (2000). Social competence: The social construction of the concept. In R. Bar-On & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory, development, assessment, and application at home, school, and in the workplace (pp. 28–39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  86. Tucker, J. S., Green, Jr, H. D., Zhou, A. J., Miles, J. N., Shih, R. A., & D’Amico, E. J. (2011). Substance use among middle school students: Associations with self-rated and peer-nominated popularity. Journal of Adolescence, 34(3), 513–519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 157–176.Google Scholar
  88. van den Berg, Y. H., Burk, W. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2015). Identifying subtypes of peer status by combining popularity and preference: A cohort-sequential approach. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(8), 1108–1137.Google Scholar
  89. Weiss, R. S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  90. Wentzel, K. R. (1994). Relations of social goal pursuit to social acceptance, classroom behavior, and perceived social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 173–182.Google Scholar
  91. Wentzel, K. R., & Asher, S. R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. Child Development, 66(3), 754–763.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Combined Program in Education and PsychologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations