Student Self-Efficacy, Classroom Engagement, and Academic Achievement: Comparing Three Theoretical Frameworks
Student self-efficacy, behavioral engagement, and emotional engagement are key factors for academic achievement. Research has yet to identify the developmental cascades linking these four constructs. Three theoretical frameworks, i.e., Self-Efficacy Theory, the Self-System Model of Motivational Development, and Expectancy-Value Theory, suggest different nexus. Following 671 students (51.8% girls) from their 4th to 6th grade, this study aims to assess competing hypotheses from these three frameworks in math. Three cross-lag models were tested to test each theoretical framework. A fourth and final model was tested to include the significant paths from the previous models. Mediation paths were also tested. Results mainly support assumptions from Self-Efficacy Theory, that is student self-efficacy and academic achievement are mutually associated from 4th to 6th grades. Some of the propositions of Expectancy-Value Theory were also supported. Self-efficacy was associated with later emotional engagement and academic achievement. However, emotional engagement in 5th grade was negatively associated with achievement in 6th grade and was not associated with behavioral engagement. Assumptions from the Self-System Model were not supported by the data. Testing the fourth model revealed an unexpected developmental cascade: 5th-grade self-efficacy mediated the association between 4th-grade achievement and 6th-grade emotional engagement. This last finding may have great implications for young adolescents as emotional engagement is an indicator of student well-being and intrinsic value of learning. Implications for theory validation and intervention targets for adolescents are discussed.
KeywordsStudent engagement Self-efficacy Academic achievement Self-Efficacy Theory Self-System Model of Motivational Development Expectancy-Value Theory
EO conceived the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript; IA provided the data, participated to the conceptualization of the study, to the analyses, and reviewed the manuscript; MD participated to the revision of the manuscript; BG participated to the conceptualization of the study and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This research was supported by a grant from the Fonds québécois pour la recherche sur la société et la culture (FRQSC) (#131430), awarded to Isabelle Archambault and by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) (#756-2017-0223), awarded to Elizabeth Olivier.
Data sharing and declaration
The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and with permission of Dr. Isabelle Archambault.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in this study were approved by the ethics committee of the University of Montreal. This research complies with APA’s ethical standards in the treatment of human samples and with the highest ethical standards.
Active informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study, both teachers and students. Parents also gave their active consent for their child to participate.
- Arens, A. K., Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Murayama, K., & vom Hofe, R. (2017). Math self-concept, grades, and achievement test scores: long-term reciprocal effects across five waves and three achievement tracks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 621–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercice of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
- Connell, J. P. (1990). Context, self, and action: a motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life span. In D. Chicchetti & M. Beeghly (Eds.), The self in transition: infancy to childhood (pp. 61–97). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: a motivational analysis of self-system process. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self process and development: the Minnesota symposia on child development (pp. 44–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
- Dupont, S., Galand, B., Nils, F., & Hospel, V. (2014). Social context, self-perceptions and student engagement: a SEM investigation of the self-system model of motivational development. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 12(1), 5–32.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Janosz, M., Pascal, S., Abrami, P. C., Cartier, S. C., Chouinard, R., Fallu, J.-S., & Desbiens, N. (2010). Rapport final d'évaluation de la Stratégie d’intervention agir autrement. Montréal, Qc: Groupe de recherche sur les environnements scolaires, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
- Lemieux, A., Besette, L., Dridi, H., Tchimou, M., Boily, M., Gravelle, F., & Lecours, M. (2017). L’organisation de l’éducation au Québec. Montréal, QC.: JDF Éditions.Google Scholar
- Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New Nork, NY: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2005). A reciprocal effects model of the causal ordersing of self-concept and achievement: new support for the benefits of enhancing self-concept. In: H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, D. McInerney, (Eds.) International advances in self research: the new frontiers of self research. (Vol. 2, pp. 15–51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age. .Google Scholar
- Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Guo, J., Arens, A. K., & Murayama, K. (2016). Breaking the double-edged sword of effort/trying hard: developmental equilibrium and longitudinal relations among effort, achievement, and academic self-concept. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1273–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Parker, P. D., Murayama, K., Guo, J., Dicke, T., & Arens, A. K. (2018). The murky distinction between self-concept and self-efficacy: beware of lurking jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
- MELS. (2016). Rapport: diplomation et qualification par commission scolaire au secondaire. Québec, Qc.: Gouvernement du Québec.Google Scholar
- Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (1996). The construction for social norms and standards. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: handbook of basic principles (pp. 799–829). New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
- Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35–54). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Seaton, M., Parker, P., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Yeung, A. S. (2013). The reciprocal relations between self-concept, motivation and achievement: juxtaposing academic self-concept and achievement goal orientations for mathematics success. Educational Psychology, 34(1), 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Skinner, E. A., Chi, U., & The Learning-Gardens Educational Assessment. (2012). Intrinsic motivation and engagement as “active ingredients” in garden-based education: examining models and measures derived from Self-Determination Theory. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43(1), 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–132). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Roberts, B. W., Schnyder, I., & Niggli, A. (2009). Different forces, same consequence: conscientiousness and competence beliefs are independent predictors of academic effort and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1115–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Valle, A., Regueiro, B., Nunez, J. C., Rodriguez, S., Pineiro, I., & Rosario, P. (2016). Academic goals, student homework engagement, and academic achievement in elementary school. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–10.Google Scholar
- Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. 7th ed. (pp. 657–700). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
- Wigfield, A, Eccles, J. S, Schiefele, U, Roeser, R. W., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In: In N. Eisenberg (Ed.) Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development. (pp. 933–1002). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
- Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Klauda, S. L. (2009). Expectancy-value theory. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 55–76). New York, NY: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar