Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 47, Issue 8, pp 1684–1696 | Cite as

Experiencing and Learning About Emotions: A Longitudinal Analysis of Youth Program Participants

Empirical Research

Abstract

Organized youth programs provide a context where adolescents experience strong emotions and may develop new ways of thinking about and dealing with emotions. The current study examined youth’s reports of positive and negative emotions arising during the course of their work in different types of project-based programs; learning about emotions from different sources (e.g., from observing peers, interacting with adult staff, or engaging in self-reflection); and longitudinal associations between emotional experiences and learning. Quantitative data were collected at two time points from 319 youth (57% female; M age = 15.8 years; 33% Latino, 29% Black, 32% White, 6% other) participating in 14 Midwestern programs focused on Leadership, Arts and Performance (Arts), and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM). Overall, positive emotions occurred more frequently than negative emotions, but emotional experiences differed based on the focus of the program. There were few significant differences in emotional learning from various sources (self, peers, staff) across the three types of programs. Multiple regression models controlling for prior learning indicated that, consistent with theory, positive emotions predicted subsequent learning about emotions from all sources. In contrast, negative emotions predicted increased learning from peers but decreased learning from self, suggesting that experiencing negative (vs. positive) emotions may lead youth to attend to different sources of information. The study’s findings have implications for theory, research, and practice.

Keywords

Organized youth programs Emotional experiences Emotional learning, Longitudinal 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the William T. Grant Foundation #10914 (R. Larson, P.I.; M. Raffaelli, co-P.I.). We thank the participants in this study and acknowledge the contributions of the Pathways Project research team. We are grateful to Reed Larson and Natalie Rusk for their input on this manuscript.

Authors’ Contributions

E.V. conceived the current study under the mentorship of M.R., reviewing the literature, conducting the statistical analysis, and drafting the article. M.R. provided input and guidance to E.V. throughout this process. M.R. was co-PI of the larger study from which data for this article were derived. Both authors read and approved the final version of this article.

Funding

The larger study was supported by a grant from the William T. Grant Foundation #10914 awarded to R. Larson, P.I. and M. Raffaelli, co-P.I. A subcontract was awarded to Kate Walker, who directed data collection at the University of Minnesota.

Data Sharing and Declaration

This article’s data will not be deposited.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Boards at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (IRB # 11663) and the University of Minnesota (IRB #1106S01502).

Informed Consent

Parental consent and youth assent were obtained. Parents received an information letter with instructions for opting their child out of the study (i.e., the requirement that parents provide written informed consent was waived). Written assent was obtained from all youth who participated in the study.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 167–203.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307301033.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beymer, P. N., Rosenberg, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Naftzger, N. J. (2018). Examining relationships among choice, affect, and engagement in summer STEM programs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1178–1191.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0814-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dworkin, J. B., Larson, R., & Hansen, D. (2003). Adolescents’ accounts of growth experiences in youth activities. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(1), 17–26.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021076222321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (1999). Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band: what kind of extracurricular involvement matters? Journal of Adolescent Research, 14(1), 10–43.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558499141003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Is extracurricular participation associated with beneficial outcomes? Concurrent and longitudinal relations. Developmental Psychology, 42(4), 698  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.4.698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologists, 58(3), 218–226.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.3.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garson, G. D., (2012). Hierarchical linear modeling: guide and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384450.Google Scholar
  10. Gaskell, C. (2008). ‘Isolation and distress’? (Re) thinking the place of emotions in youth research. Children’s Geographies, 6(2), 169–181.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280801963128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldstein, T. R., Lerner, M. D., & Winner, E. (2017). The arts as a venue for developmental science: realizing a latent opportunity. Child Development, 88, 1505–1512.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12884.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansen, D. M., Larson, R. W., & Dworkin, J. B. (2003). What adolescents learn in organized youth activities: a survey of self‐reported developmental experiences. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13(1), 25–55.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.1301006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Izard, C. E. (2002). Translating emotion theory and research into preventive interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 796–824.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.796.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Larson, R. W., & Angus, R. M. (2011). Adolescents’ development of skills for agency in youth programs: learning to think strategically. Child Development, 82, 277–294.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01555.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Larson, R. W., & Brown, J. R. (2007). Emotional development in adolescence: what can be learned from a high school theater program? Child Development, 78(4), 1083–1099.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01054.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Larson, R. W., Hansen, D., & Moneta, G. (2006). Differing profiles of developmental experiences across types of organized youth activities. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 849–863.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.849.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Little, R. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahoney, J. L., Larson, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Lord, H. (2005). Organized activities as developmental contexts for children and adolescents. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson & J. S. Eccles (Eds), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 3–22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Mahoney, J. L., Vandell, D. L., Simpkins, S., & Zarrett, N. (2009). Adolescent out-of-school activities. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed.). Vol.2: Contextual influences on adolescent development (pp. 228–267). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Martin, A. J., Mansour, M., Anderson, M., Gibson, R., Liem, G. A., & Sudmalis, D. (2013). The role of arts participation in students’ academic and nonacademic outcomes: a longitudinal study of school, home, and community factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 709  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McLauchlan, D., & Winters, K. L. (2014). What’s so great about drama class? Year I secondary students have their say. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 19(1), 51–63.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2013.872431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perry, S. C. (2013). How teens learn to work together: collaborative processes of development at camp (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
  23. Pittman, K. (2017). Why after-school matters for positive youth development. In N. Deutsch (Ed.), After-school programs to promote positive youth development SpringerBriefs in Psychology (pp. 1–12). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Raffaelli, M., Armstrong, J., Tran, S. P., Griffith, A. N., Walker, K., & Gutiérrez, V. (2016). Beyond paper and pencil: conducting computer-assisted data collection with adolescents in group settings. Journal of Adolescence, 49, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.02.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Reschly, A. L., Huebner, E. S., Appleton, J. J., & Antaramian, S. (2008). Engagement as flourishing: the contribution of positive emotions and coping to adolescents’ engagement at school and with learning. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 419–431.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rhodes, J. E. (2004). The critical ingredient: caring youth‐staff relationships in after‐school settings. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2004(101), 145–161.  https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.75.Google Scholar
  27. Rosenblum, G. D., & Lewis, M. (2003). Emotional development in adolescence. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Adolescence (pp. 269–289). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Rusk, N., Larson, R. W., Raffaelli, M., Walker, K., Washington, L., Gutierrez, V., & Perry, S. C. (2013). Positive youth development in organized programs: how teens learn to manage emotions. In C. Proctor & A. Linley (Eds.), Research, applications, and interventions for children and adolescents: a positive psychology perspective (pp. 247–261). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schlomer, G. L., Bauman, S., & Card, N. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018082.supp.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Shernoff, D. J., & Vandell, D. L. (2007). Engagement in after-school program activities: quality of experience from the perspective of participants. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(7), 891–903.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9183-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Discrete dependent variables. In T. A. B. Snijders & R. J. Bosker (Eds.), Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (pp. 304–307). London, UK: Sage Publisher.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, C., McGovern, G., Larson, R., Hillaker, B., & Peck, S. C. (2016). Preparing youth to thrive: promising practices in social emotional learning. Washington, DC: Forum for Youth Investment.Google Scholar
  33. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  34. Vandell, D. L., Larson, R. W., Mahoney, J. L., Watts, T. W. (2015). Children’s organized activities. In: M. H. Bornstein, T. Leventhal, R. Lerner, (eds.)Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, 7th Ed., Vol. 4: Ecological Settings and Processes in Developmental Systems. (pp. 305–344). New York, NY: Wiley. 10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy408.Google Scholar
  35. Vandell, D. L., Shernoff, D. J., Pierce, K. M., Bolt, D. M., Dadisman, K., & Brown, B. B. (2005). Activities, engagement, and emotion in after-school programs (and elsewhere). New Directions for Youth Development, 105, 121–129.  https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yilmaz, M., Ren, J., Custer, S., & Coleman, J. (2010). Hands-on summer camp to attract k-12 students to engineering fields. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(1), 144–151.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2009.2026366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesUniversity of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations