The Intersection of Emotional and Sociocognitive Competencies with Civic Engagement in Middle Childhood and Adolescence
- 461 Downloads
Civic developmental theory anticipates connections between normative developmental competencies and civic engagement, but little previous research has directly studied such links. The current study sought to contribute to civic development theory by examining associations between emotional and sociocognitive competencies (empathy, emotion regulation, prosocial moral reasoning, future-orientation) and civic engagement (volunteering, informal helping, political behaviors and beliefs, environmental behaviors, social responsibility values, civic skills). Data came from a geographically and racially diverse sample of 2467 youth (Mage = 13.4, Range: 8–20 years, 56% female). The results indicated that empathy and future-orientation significantly predicted nearly all forms of civic engagement, whereas emotion regulation and prosocial moral reasoning were uniquely associated with specific forms of civic engagement. Exploratory multi-group models indicated that empathy and emotion regulation were more strongly associated with civic engagement among younger youth and prosocial moral reasoning and future-orientation were more strongly related to civic engagement among older youth. The findings help to advance developmental theory of youth civic engagement.
KeywordsCivic engagement Political participation Positive youth development Prosocial behavior Developmental theory
A.M. conceived of the study, participated in its design and drafted the manuscript; L.A. helped to draft the manuscript, participated in acquisition of the data, performed statistical analyses and interpretation of the data; B.O. participated in acquisition of the data, performed statistical analyses and interpretation of the data, and helped draft the results; E.B. performed statistical analyses and participated in the conception of the study; A.S. and L.W.L. participated in the design and coordination of the study and were involved in revising the manuscript for critically important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was funded by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation and the National Science Foundation. The opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the values of these organizations.
Data Sharing Declaration
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Betts, J. E., Appleton, J. J., Reschly, A. L., Christenson, S. L., & Huebner, E. S. (2010). A study of the factorial invariance of the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI): Results from middle and high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carlo, G. (2014). The development and correlates of prosocial moral behaviors. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (2nd ed.). (pp. 208–234). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2010). Feelings or cognitions? Moral cognitions and emotions as longitudinal predictors of prosocial and aggressive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 872–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2011). The longitudinal relations among dimensions of parenting styles, sympathy, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(2), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410375921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255.Google Scholar
- Davis, M. H. (1996). Empathy: A social-psychological approach. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N. (1990). Prosocial development in early and mid-adolescence. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), From childhood to adolescence: A transitional period? Advances in adolescence (Vol. 2, pp. 240–269). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N. (2006). Prosocial Behavior. In G. G. Bear & K. M. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 313–324). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N. (2009). Empathy-related responding: Links with self-regulation, moral judgment, and moral behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 129–148). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., & Shepard, S. A. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00095.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial orientation. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development. 6th edn. (pp. 646–718). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., & Spinrad, T. (2007). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol 3 Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (6th ed.). (pp. 646–718). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Flanagan, C., Gill, S., & Gallay, L. (2014). Social participation and social trust in adolescence: The importance of heterogeneous encounters. In A. M. Otto (Ed.), Processes of community change and social action (pp. 149–202). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Flanagan, C. A. (2004). Volunteerism, leadership, political socialization, and civic engagement. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed.). (pp. 721–745). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Flanagan, C. A., Syvertsen, A. K., & Stout, M. D. (2007). Civic measurement models: Tapping adolescents’ civic engagement. CIRCLE Working Paper 55. Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE).Google Scholar
- Galinsky, E. (1999). Ask the children: What America’s children really think about working parents. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, K., Zukin, C., & Andolina, M. (1990). Three core measures of community-based civic engagement: Evidence from the youth civic engagement indicators project. In Child Trends Conference on Indicators of Positive Development. Presented at the Child Trends Conference on Indicators of Positive Development March 11–12, 2003. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Jugert, P., Eckstein, K., Noack, P., Kuhn, A., & Benbow, A. (2013). Offline and online civic engagement among adolescents and young adults from three ethnic groups. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1–13.Google Scholar
- Kahn Jr., P. H. (1992). Children’s obligatory and discretionary moral judgments. Child Development, 63, 416–430.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In: T. Mischel (ed.) Psychology and genetic epistemology. (pp. 151–235). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Lenzi, M., Vieno, A., Perkins, D. D., Santinello, M., Elgar, F. J., Morgan, A., & Mazzardis, S. (2012). Family affluence, school and neighborhood contexts and adolescents’ civic engagement: A cross-national study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(1–2), 197–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lerner, R. M., Wang, J., Champine, R. B., Warren, D. J., & Erickson, K. (2014). Development of civic engagement: Theoretical and methodological issues. International Journal of Developmental Science, 8(3–4), 69–79.Google Scholar
- MacDermott, S. T., Gullone, E., Allen,J. S., King, N. J., & Tonge, B. J. (2009). The emotion regulation index for children and adolescents (ERICA): A psychometric investigation. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9154-0.
- Metzger, A., Oosterhoff, B., Palmer, C. A., & Ferris, K. (2014). Dimensions of citizenship: Associations among adolescents’ sociopolitical values and civic judgments. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(2), 443–448.Google Scholar
- Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In W. Damon, R. Lerner & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Social, emotional, and personality development: Vol. 3. Handbook of child psychology (6th ed.). (pp. 66–166). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Sherrod, L. R., & Lauckhardt, J. (2009). The development of citizenship. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Contextual influences on adolescent development (3rd ed.). (Vol. 2, pp. 372–408). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Sherrod, L. R., Torney-Purta, J., & Flanagan, C. A. (2010). Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
- Sirianni, C., & Friedland, L. A. (2005). The civic renewal movement: Community building and democracy in the United States. Kettering Foundation Press, Dayton, OH.Google Scholar
- Syvertsen, A. K., Wray-Lake, L., & Metzger, A. (2015). Youth civic and character measures toolkit. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.Google Scholar
- Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wray-Lake, L., Metzger, A., & Syvertsen, A. K. (2016). Testing multidimensional models of youth civic engagement: Model comparisons, measurement, measurement invariance, and age differences. Applied Developmental Science. https://doi.org/0.1080/10888691.2016.1205495.Google Scholar
- Wray-Lake, L., & Syvertsen, A. (2011). The developmental roots of social responsibility in childhood and adolescence. In C. Flanagan, B. Christens (Vol. Eds.), L. Jensen & R. Larson (Series Eds.), New directions for child and adolescent development 134, (11–25). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Zaff, J. F., Boyd, M., Li, Y., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010a). Active and engaged citizenship: Multi-group and longitudinal factorial analysis of an integrated construct of civic engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 736–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9541-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zaff, J. F., Hart, D., Flanagan, C., Youniss, J., & Levine, P. (2010b). Developing civic engagement within a civic context. In M. Lamb & A. Freund (Eds.), The handbook of life-span development (pp. 590–624). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar