Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 917–930 | Cite as

Gender Identity Disparities in Bathroom Safety and Wellbeing among High School Students

Empirical Research

Abstract

By examining the relationship between trans identity, bathroom safety and wellbeing among high school students, this article empirically investigates how educational institutions operate as sites through which gender is negotiated in ways that are consequential for trans youth. We draw cross-sectional survey data, from a multi-school climate survey (n = 1046) conducted in the Midwestern United States, to examine three aspects of high school students’ wellbeing: safety at school, self-esteem, and grades. The sample included students in 9th–12th grade who identified as trans (9.2%) and cisgender (41.2% boys, 49.6% girls), as well as LGBQ (21.6%) and heterosexual (78.4%). Most respondents were monoracial white (65.8%), monoracial Black (12.4%), and multiracial (14.1%). Using mediation and moderation linear regression models, we show that feeling safe using school facilities helps to explain widespread inequalities between trans and cisgender students. Based on these results, we suggest that in order to address disparities in educational outcomes between trans and cisgender students, as well as to improve student wellbeing in general, policies and practices need to ensure that all students have the right to safely access bathrooms and school facilities.

Keywords

Transgender Bathroom access Cissexism School climate Wellbeing Students 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thank you to the leaders involved in Riot Youth at the Neutral Zone in Ann Arbor and the school-based organizations who helped to collect this data and are working to ensure that LGBTQ and similarly identified students have access to educational opportunities and supportive communities. We’d also like to thank Fuhua Zhai and Daniel Coleman from Fordham University for their statistical support and Milo Inglehart and Adrienne Dessel for their collaborations in the larger project. Funding for this project was provided by the Faculty Research Expense Program, Fordham University (Grant awarded to LJW).

Author Contributions

Riot Youth leaders conceived of the study in consultation with A.K. & L.J.W. L.J.W. conceived of this manuscript with A.K. and performed statistical analysis. A.K. contributed to the exploratory statistical analysis and interpreting quantitative findings. A.K. and L.W. consulted with legal experts and adult stuff at Neutral Zone. M.C. reviewed extant literature and crafted the introduction. L.J.W., A.K., and M.C. collaborated in writing the manuscript, including the theoretical framework and implications. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aragon, S. R., Poteat, V. P., Espelage, D. L., & Koenig, B. W. (2014). The influence of peer victimization on educational outcomes for LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ high school students. Journal of LGBT Youth, 11(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baams, L., Beek, T., Hille, H., Zevenbergen, F. C., & Bos, H. M. W. (2013). Gender nonconformity, perceived stigmatization, and psychological well-being in Dutch sexual minority youth and young adults: A mediation analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(5), 765–773.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker-Plummer, B. (2013). Fixing Gwen: News and the mediation of (trans) gender challenges. Feminist Media Studies, 13(4), 710–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum, J., Brill, S., Brown, J., Delpercio, A., Khan, E., Kenney, L., & Nicoll, A. (2013). Supporting and caring for our gender expansive youth. Washington, D.C., WA: Human Rights Campaign Foundation and Gender Spectrum.Google Scholar
  5. Bender-Baird, K. (2016). Peeing under surveillance: Bathrooms, gender policing, and hate violence. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(7), 983–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breen, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Browne, K. (2004). Genderism and the bathroom problem:(Re) materialising sexed sites,(re) creating sexed bodies. Gender, Place & Culture, 11(3), 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchmann, C., DiPrete, T. A., & McDaniel, A. (2008). Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clements-Nolle, K., Marx, R., & Katz, M. (2006). Attempted suicide among transgender persons: The influence of gender-based discrimination and victimization. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(3), 53–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dessel, A. B., Woodford, M. R., Routenberg, R., & Breijak, D. P. (2013). Heterosexual students’ experiences in sexual orientation intergroup dialogue courses. Journal of Homosexuality, 60(7), 1054–1080.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Esmaeili, S., & Arabmofrad, A. (2015). A critical discourse analysis of family and friends textbooks: Representation of genderism. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(4), 55–61.Google Scholar
  12. Fabricant, M. (2010). Organizing for educational justice: The campaign for public school reform in the South Bronx. Minneapolis, MN: U of Minnesota.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischer, D., Bellinger, L. B., Horn, S. S., & Sullivan, S. L. (2016). Advocacy to support gender identity development in schools in the face of organized backlash. In S. Russell, S. Horn (Eds.), Sexual orientation, gender identity, and schooling: The nexus of research, practice, and policy (pp. 219–237). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gates, G.J. (2011). Issue brief: How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender? http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Gates-How-Many-People-LGBT-Apr-2011.pdf Accessed 23 Dec 2016
  15. Grant, J., Lisa, M., Tanis, J., Harrison, J., Herman, J., & Keisling, M. (2011). Injustice at every turn: A report of the national transgender discrimination survey. Washington, WA: National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.Google Scholar
  16. Greytak, E., Kosciw, J., & Diaz, E. (2009). Harsh realities: The experiences of transgender youth in our nation’s schools. New York, NY: GLSEN.Google Scholar
  17. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  18. Hayes, A.F., & Rockwood, N.J. (2016). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation, Behaviour Research and Therapy, doi:10.1016/ j.brat.2016.11.001.Google Scholar
  19. Herman, J., Flores, A., Brown, T., Wilson, B., & Conron, K. (2017). Age of individuals who identify as transgender in the United States. Los Angeles: Williams Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Hill, D. B., & Willoughby, B. L. B. (2005). The development and validation of the genderism and transphobia scale. Sex Roles, 53(7-8), 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ingrey, J. C. (2012). The public school washroom as analytic space for troubling gender: Investigating the spatiality of gender through students’ self-knowledge. Gender and Education, 24(7), 799–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. James, S. E., Herman, J. L., Rankin, S., Keisling, M., Mottet, L., & Anafi, M. (2016). The report of the 2015 U.S. transgender survey. Washington, WA: National Center for Transgender Equality.Google Scholar
  23. Johnson, J. (2014). Transgender youth in public schools: Why identity matters in the restroom. William Mitchell Law Rev Sua Sponte, 40, 63–98.Google Scholar
  24. Julia, S. (2007). Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. Emeryville, CA: Seal.Google Scholar
  25. Koken, J. A., Bimbi, D. S., & Parsons, J. T. (2009). Experiences of familial acceptance–rejection among transwomen of color. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(6), 853–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Kosciw, J. G., Greytak, E. A., Giga, N. M., Villenas, C., & Danischewski, D. (2016). 2015 national school climate survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth in our nation’s schools. New York, NY: GLSEN.Google Scholar
  27. Koyama, E. (2003). The transfeminist manifesto. In R. Dicker, A. Piepmeiser (Eds.), Catching a wave: Reclaiming feminism for the 21st century (pp. 244–262). Lebanon, NH: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Larsen, H.G. (2016). The antecedent of fear in the public discourse: From Donald Trump's nativism to transgender bathroom access. International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology 3(2): 177.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, V.E.. (2001). Restructuring high schools for equity and excellence: What works. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  30. Liptak, A. (2016 October 28). Supreme court to rule in transgender access case. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/29/us/politics/supreme-court-to-rule-in-transgender-access-case.html?_r=0
  31. Lombardi, E. (2009). Varieties of transgender/transsexual lives and their relationship with transphobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 56(8), 977–992.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lombardi, E. L., Wilchins, R. A., Priesing, D., & Malouf, D. (2002). Gender violence: Transgender experiences with violence and discrimination. Journal of Homosexuality, 42(1), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGuire, J. K., Anderson, C. R., Toomey, R. B., & Russell, S. T. (2010). School climate for transgender youth: A mixed method investigation of student experiences and school responses. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(10), 1175–1188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Moffit, R. E. (2015). Keeping the John open to Jane: How California’s bathroom bill brings transgender rights out of the water closet. Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law, 16, 475.Google Scholar
  35. Nadal, K. L., & Griffin, K. E. (2011). Microaggressions: A root of bullying, violence, and victimization toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youths. The Psychology of Teen Violence and Victimization, 1, 3–22.Google Scholar
  36. Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (2002). Struggling for educational equity in diverse communities: School reform as social movement. Journal of Educational Change, 3(3-4), 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peters, J.W., Becker, J., & Hirschfield Davis, J. (2017, February 22). Trump rescinds rules on bathrooms for transgender students. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com.
  38. Porta, C. M., Gower, A. L., Mehus, C. J., Yu, X., Saewyc, E. M., & Eisenberg, M. E. (2017). “Kicked out”: LGBTQ youths’ bathroom experiences and preferences. Journal of Adolescence, 56, 107–112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Reisner, S. L., Hughto, J. M. W., Dunham, E. E., Heflin, K. J., Begenyi, J. B. G., Coffey-Esquivel, J., & Cahill, S. (2015). Legal protections in public accommodations settings: A critical public health issue for transgender and gender‐nonconforming people. Milbank Quarterly, 93(3), 484–515.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Robinson, J. P., & Espelage, D. L. (2011). Inequities in educational and psychological outcomes between LGBTQ and straight students in middle and high school. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Schuster, M. A., Reisner, S. L., & Onorato, S. E. (2016). Beyond bathrooms—meeting the health needs of transgender people. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(2), 101–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Seelman, K. L. (2014). Transgender individuals’ access to college housing and bathrooms: Findings from the national transgender discrimination survey. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 26(2), 186–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seelman, K. L. (2016). Transgender adults’ access to college bathrooms and housing and the relationship to suicidality. Journal of Homosexuality, 10, 1–22.Google Scholar
  45. Sevelius, J. M. (2013). Gender affirmation: A framework for conceptualizing risk behavior among transgender women of color. Sex Roles, 68(11-12), 675–689.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Solorzano, D. G., & Ornelas, A. (2004). A critical race analysis of Latina/o and African American advanced placement enrollment in public high schools. The High School Journal, 87(3), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stanley, E. A., Smith, N. (Eds.) (2011). Captive genders: Trans embodiment and the prison industrial complex. Baltimore, MD: AK.Google Scholar
  48. Sterling, M. (2014). To pee or not to pee-where is the question: Transgender students and the right to use public school restrooms. Cardozo JL & Gender, 21, 757.Google Scholar
  49. Sutton, H. (2016). Transgender college students more at risk for suicide when denied bathroom, housing rights. Campus Security Report, 13(2), 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Szczerbinski, K. (2016). Education connection: The importance of allowing students to use bathrooms and locker rooms reflecting their gender identity. Children’s Legal Rights Journal, 36, 153.Google Scholar
  51. Tobin, H. J., & Levi, J. (2013). Securing equal access to sex-segregated facilities for transgender students. Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society, 28, 301–330.Google Scholar
  52. Toomey, R.B. (2014). More than just queer or trans*: Exploring youth risk and resilience through a quantitative intersectional lens. In Keynote address, 2nd Annual LGBT Research Symposium. University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign School of Social Work. Champaign, IL: Author.Google Scholar
  53. Toomey, R. B., Ryan, C., Diaz, R. M., Card, N. A., & Russell, S. T. (2010). Gender-nonconforming lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth: School victimization and young adult psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1580–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Every student succeeds act. Washington, D.C., WA: United States Department of Education.Google Scholar
  55. Weinberg, J. D. (2009). Transgender bathroom usage: A privileging of biology and physical difference in the law. Buffalo Journal of Gender, Law & Social Policy, 18, 147.Google Scholar
  56. Wernick, L. J., Kulick, A., & Inglehart, M. H. (2014). Influences of peers, teachers, and climate on students’ willingness to intervene when witnessing antitransgender harassment. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 927–935.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Woolley, S. W. (2016). Contesting silence, claiming space: Gender and sexuality in the neo-liberal public high school. Gender and Education, 29, 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yosso, T. J. (2006). Critical race counterstories along the Chicana/Chicano educational pipeline. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Yunger, J. L., Carver, P. R., & Perry, D. G. (2004). Does gender identity influence children’s psychological well-being? Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 572–582.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Social ServiceFordham UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology, Social Sciences & Media Studies BldgUniversity of California Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA
  3. 3.Graduate School of Social ServiceFordham UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations