Social Capital and Bystander Behavior in Bullying: Internalizing Problems as a Barrier to Prosocial Intervention
- 1.6k Downloads
Theory and research suggests that individuals with greater social capital (i.e., resources and benefits gained from relationships, experiences, and social interactions) may be more likely to be active, prosocial bystanders in bullying situations. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to examine the association of social capital (social support and social skills) with prosocial bystander behavior, and the role of internalizing problems as a potential barrier to this relation among 299 students (45.8% girls, 95% White) in sixth, seventh, and eighth grades. Results indicate a positive relation between social capital and prosocial bystander behavior. In addition, internalizing problems were a significant risk factor that may hinder youth—particularly girls—from engaging in defending behavior. Prosocial bystanders are an essential component to prevent and reduce bullying and further research is needed to better understand how to foster prosocial behavior in bullying situations, perhaps by utilizing social capital, related to school bullying.
KeywordsSocial capital Defending Bystander behavior Social skills Social support
The study did not have any sources of funding.
L. J. conceived of the study, coordinated and oversaw data collection, and helped with the design of the study. S. F. helped with the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis and data interpretation. Both authors drafted the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Data were collected at a middle school as part of a school-wide social and emotional evaluation. In accordance with school procedures, parents/guardians provided consent for all social, emotional, behavioral, and academic universal evaluations (i.e., assessments given to all students) at the beginning of the school year at registration. One week prior to the evaluation, a letter was sent to parents/guardians to notify them of the data collection and were given the option to have their child opt out of participating in the study.
- Anme, T., Shinohara, R., Sugisawa, Y., Tong, L., Tanaka, E., Watanabe, T. et al. & Japan Children’s Study Group. (2010). Gender differences of children’s social skills and parenting using interaction rating scale (IRS). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 260–268. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.008.
- Barriga, A. Q., Doran, J. W., Newell, S. B., Morrison, E. M., Babbetti, V., & Robbins, B. D. (2002). Relationships between problem behaviors and academic achievement in adolescents: The unique role of attention problems. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 233–240. doi: 10.1177/10634266020100040501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brown, B. B., & Klute, C. (2003). Cliques, crowds, and friendships. In G. R. Adams & M. Berzonsky (Eds.), Handbook of Adolescent Development (pp. 330–348). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Cappadocia, M. C., Pepler, D., Cummings, J. G., & Craig, W. (2012). Individual motivations and characteristics associated with bystander intervention during bullying episodes among children and youth. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27, 201–216. doi: 10.1177/0829573512450567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Davidson, L. M., & Demaray, M. K. (2007). Social support as a moderator between victimization and internalizing-externalizing distress from bullying. School Psychology Review, 36, 383–405.Google Scholar
- Dowdy, E., Chin, J. K., Twyford, J. M., & Dever, B. V. (2011). A factor analytic investigation of the BASC-2 behavioral and emotional screening system parent form: Psychometric properties, practical implications, and future directions. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 265–280. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evans, C. B., & Smokowski, P. R. (2016). Negative bystander behavior in bullying dynamics: Assessing the impact of social capital deprivation and anti-social capital. Child Psychiatry Human Development, 48(1), 120–135. doi: 10.1007/s10578-016-0657-0.
- Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., Kastenmuller, A., Krueger, J., Vogrincic, C., Frey, D., Heene, M., Wicher, M., & Kainbacher, M. (2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 517–537. doi: 10.1037/a0023304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fredrick, S. S., Demaray, M. K., & Jenkins, L. N. (2016). Multidimensional perfectionism and internalizing problems: Does teacher and classmate support matter? Journal of Early Adolescence. doi: 10.1177/0272431616636231.
- Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Snell, J. L., Edstrom, L., Van Schoiack, L., MacKenzie, E. P., & Broderick, C. J. (2005). Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: An experimental trial of the steps to respect program. Developmental Psychology, 41, 479–491. doi: 10.1037/0012-16126.96.36.1999.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (2008). Social skills improvement system: Rating scales manual. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
- Gresham, F. M., Elliott, S. N., Vance, M. J., & Cook, C. R. (2011). Comparability of the Social Skills Rating System to the Social Skills Improvement System: Content and psychometric comparisons across elementary and secondary age levels. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(1), 27–44. doi: 10.10.1037/a0022662.
- Harter, S. (1985). Competence as a dimension of self-evaluation: Toward a comprehensive model of self-worth. In R. L. Leahy (Ed.), The development of the self (pp. 55–121). New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
- Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2007). BASC-2 behavioral and emotional screening system (BESS) manual. Circle Pines, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Kovacs, M., & Beck, A. T. (1977). An empirical-clinical approach toward a definition of childhood depression. In J. G. Schulterbrandt & A. Raskin (Eds.), Depression in childhood: Diagnosis, treatment, and conceptual models (pp. 1–25). New York, NY: Raven.Google Scholar
- Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Malecki, C. K., Demaray, M. K., & Elliott, S. N. (2000). The child and adolescent social support scale. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
- Merrell, K. W., Carrizales, D. C., Feuerborn, L., Gueldner, B. A., & Tran, O. K. (2007). Strong teens-Grades 9-12: A social-emotional learning curriculum. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide. 7th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Nangle, D. W., Erdley, C. A., Newman, J. E., Mason, C. A., & Carpenter, E. M. (2003). Popularity, friendship quantity, and friendship quality: Interactive influences on children’s loneliness and depression. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 546–555. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3204_7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nansel, T., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R., Ruan, W., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth: Prevalence and associations with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.16.2094.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Obradovic, J., & Hipwell, A. (2010). Psychopathology and social competence during the transition to adolescence: The role of family adversity and pubertal development. Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 621–634. doi: 10.1017/S0954579410000325.
- Olivia, A., Parra, A., & Reina, C. (2014). Personal and contextual factors related to internalizing problems during adolescence. Child Youth Care Forum, 43(4), 505–520. doi: 10.1007/s10566-014-9250-5.
- Polanin, J., Espelage, D., & Pigott, T. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41, 47–65.Google Scholar
- Pöyhönen, V., Juvonen, J., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). What does it take to stand up for the victim of bullying? The interplay between personal and social factors. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(2), 143–163. doi: 10.1353/mpq.0.0046.
- Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Rose, A. J., Carlson, W., & Waller, E. M. (2007). Prospective associations of co-rumination with friendship and emotional adjustment: considering the socioemotional trade-offs of co-rumination. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1019–1031. doi: 10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.529.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2010). Relationship between multiple sources of perceived social support and psychological and academic adjustment in early adolescence: Comparisons across gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 47–61. doi: 10.1007/s10964-008-9368-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schaps, E. (2009, March/April). Creating caring school communities. Leadership, 38(4), 8–11. Retrieved from www.collaborativeclassroom.org.
- Smokowski, P. R., Cotter, K. L., Robertson, C., & Guo, S. (2013). Demographic, psychological, and school environment correlates of bullying victimization and school hassles in rural youth. Journal of Criminology. doi: 10.1155/2013/137583.
- Smokowski, P. R., Guo, S., Rose, R., Evans, C. B. R., & Cotter, K. L. (2014). Multilevel risk and protective factors for internalizing symptoms and self-esteem in disadvantaged adolescents: Modeling developmental trajectories from the rural adaptation project. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 1495–1513. doi: 10.1017/S0954579414001163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Summers, K. H., & Demaray, M. K. (2008). Bully participant behavior questionnaire. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
- Whitaker, D. J., Rosenbluth, B., Valle, L. A., & Sanchez, E. (2004). Expect respect: A school-based intervention to promote awareness and effective responses to bullying and sexual harassment. In D. L. Espelage, & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools. 1st edn. (pp. 327–350). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Wicks-Nelson, R., & Israel, A. C. (Eds.) (1991). Behavior disorders of childhood. New Jersey City, NJ: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar