Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 986–1002 | Cite as

The Enduring Significance of Skin Tone: Linking Skin Tone, Attitudes Toward Marriage and Cohabitation, and Sexual Behavior

  • Antoinette M. LandorEmail author
  • Carolyn Tucker Halpern
Empirical Research

Abstract

Past evidence has documented that attitudes toward marriage and cohabitation are related to sexual behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. This study extends prior research by longitudinally testing these associations across racial/ethnic groups and investigating whether culturally relevant variations within racial/ethnic minority groups, such as skin tone (i.e., lightness/darkness of skin color), are linked to attitudes toward marriage and cohabitation and sex. Drawing on family and public health literatures and theories, as well as burgeoning skin tone literature, it was hypothesized that more positive attitudes toward marriage and negative attitudes toward cohabitation would be associated with less risky sex, and that links differed for lighter and darker skin individuals. The sample included 6872 respondents (49.6 % female; 70.0 % White; 15.8 % African American; 3.3 % Asian; 10.9 % Hispanic) from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. The results revealed that marital attitudes had a significantly stronger dampening effect on risky sexual behavior of lighter skin African Americans and Asians compared with their darker skin counterparts. Skin tone also directly predicted number of partners and concurrent partners among African American males and Asian females. We discuss theoretical and practical implications of these findings for adolescence and young adulthood.

Keywords

Marriage Cohabitation Sexual behavior Skin tone Adolescents Young adults 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by Grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth). No direct support was received from grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis.

Funding

Halpern’s effort was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Grant R01-HD57046; C. T. Halpern, Principal Investigator) and by the Carolina Population Center (Grant 5 R24 HD050924, awarded to the Carolina Population Center at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development).

Author Contributions

AL conceived of the study, participated in its design and interpretation of the data, performed the statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript; CH participated in the interpretation of the data analyses and editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no conflict of interests.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

References

  1. Adimora, A. A., Schoenback, V. J., & Doherty, I. A. (2007). Concurrent sexual partnerships among men in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 97(12), 2230–2237. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.099069.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, W., Telles, E., & Hunter, M. (2000). Skin color, income, and education: A comparison of African Americans and Mexican Americans. National Journal of Sociology, 12, 129–180.Google Scholar
  5. Arnett, J. J., & Tanner, J. L. (Eds.). (2006). Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  6. Awad, G. H., Norwood, C., Taylor, D. S., Martinez, M., McClain, S., Jones, B., et al. (2014). Beauty and Body Image Concerns Among African American College Women. Journal of Black Psychology,. doi: 10.1177/0095798414550864.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bodenhorn, H. (2006). Colorism, complexion homogamy, and household wealth: Some historical evidence. The American Economic Review, 96(2), 256–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bond, S., & Cash, T. F. (1992). Black beauty: Skin color and body images among African-American college women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(11), 874–888. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00930.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonilla-Silva, E. (2002). We are all Americans!: The Latin Americanization of racial stratification in the USA. Race and Society, 5, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boylorn, R. M. (2012). Dark-skinned love stories. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5(3), 299–309. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/irqr.2012.5.3.299.
  11. Bramlett, M. D., & Mosher, W. D. (2002). Cohabition, marriage, divorce and remarriage in the United States (Series 22, No 2). Retrieved March 3, 2013, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_022.pdf.
  12. Bulcroft, R. A., & Bulcroft, K. A. (1993). Race differences in attitudinal and motivational factors in the decision to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 338–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burton, L. M., Bonilla-Silva, E., Ray, V., Buckelew, R., & Freeman, E. H. (2010). Critical race theories, colorism, and the decade’s research on families of color. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 440–459. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00712.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carroll, J. S., Willoughby, B., Badger, S., Nelson, L. J., Barry, C., & Madsen, S. D. (2007). So close, yet so far away: The impact of varying marital horizons on emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(3), 219–247. doi: 10.1177/0743558407299697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chambers, A. L., & Kravitz, A. (2011). Understanding the disproportionately low marriage rate among African Americans: An amalgam of sociological and psychological constraints. Family Relations, 60(5), 648–660. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00673.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chandra, A., Mosher, W. D., Copen, C., & Sionbean, C. (2011). Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual identity in the United States: Data from the 2006-2008 National Survey of Family Growth (National Health Statistics Reports No. 36). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  17. Cherlin, A. J. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 403–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00710.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Christopher, F. S., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 999–1017. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00607.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark, S., Poulin, M., & Kohler, H. P. (2009). Marital aspirations, sexual behaviors, and HIV/AIDS in rural Malawi. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(2), 396–416.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Crissey, S. R. (2005). Race/ethnic differences in the marital expectations of adolescents: The role of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 697–709. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00163.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cunningham, M., & Thornton, A. (2005). The influence of union transitions on White adults’ attitudes toward cohabitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 710–720. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00164.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2011). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Edwards, K., Carter-Tellison, K., & Herring, C. (2004). For richer, for poorer, whether dark or light: Skin tone, marital status, and spouse’s earnings (pp. 65–81). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ferdinand, R. (2015). Skin tone and popular culture: My story as a dark skinned black woman. The Popular Culture Studies Journal, 3, 324–348.Google Scholar
  25. Fergus, S., Zimmerman, M. A., & Caldwell, C. H. (2007). Growth trajectories of sexual risk behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. American Journal of Public Health, 97(6), 1096–1101. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.074609.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  27. Golden, M. (2007). Don’t play in the sun: One woman’s journey through the color complex. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  28. Gyimah-Brempong, K., & Price, G. N. (2006). Crime and punishment: And skin hue too? The American Economic Review, 96(2), 246–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Halpern, C. T., Joyner, K., Udry, J. R., & Suchindran, C. (2000). Smart teens don’t have sex (or kiss much either). Journal of Adolescent Health, 26(3), 213–225.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Halpern, C. T., Oslak, S. G., Young, M. L., Martin, S. L., & Kupper, L. L. (2001). Partner violence among adolescents in opposite-sex romantic relationships: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. American Journal of Public Health, 91(10), 1679–1685. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.91.10.1679.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Halpern, C. T., Waller, M. W., Spriggs, A., & Hallfors, D. D. (2006). Adolescent predictors of emerging adult sexual patterns. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 926. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.08.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Halpern, C. T., Young, M. L., Waller, M. W., Martin, S. L., & Kupper, L. L. (2004). Prevalence of partner violence in same-sex romantic and sexual relationships in a national sample of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35(2), 124–131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamilton, D., Goldsmith, A. H., & Darity, W, Jr. (2009). Shedding “light” on marriage: The influence of skin shade on marriage for black females. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 72(1), 30–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2009.05.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harris, K. M., Halpern, C. T., Whitsel, E., Hussey, J., Tabor, J., & Entzel, P., et al. (2009). The national longitudinal study of adolescent health: Research design. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design.
  35. Herring, C., Keith, V., & Horton, H. D. (2004). Skin deep: How race and complexion matter in the “color-blind” era. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hunter, M. L. (1998). Colorstruck: Skin color stratification in the lives of African American women. Sociological Inquiry, 68(4), 517–535. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1998.tb00483.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hunter, M. L. (2002). If you’re light you’re alright: Light skin color as social capital for women of color. Gender and Society, 16(2), 175–193.Google Scholar
  38. Hunter, M. (2007). The persistent problem of colorism: Skin tone, status, and inequality. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hurt, T. R., McElroy, S. E., Sheats, K. J., Landor, A. M., & Bryant, C. M. (2014). Married Black men’s opinions as to why Black women are disproportionately single: A qualitative study. Personal Relationships, 21(1), 88–109.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Jablonski, N. G. (2004). The evolution of human skin and skin color. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 585–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Keith, V. M., & Herring, C. (1991). Skin tone and stratification in the Black community. American Journal of Sociology, 97(3), 760–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. (2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research, 19, 1663–1692.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Landor, A. M. (under review). Beyond Black and White but still in color: Examining skin tone and marriage attitudes and outcomes across racial/ethnic groups.Google Scholar
  44. Landor, A. M., & Simons, L. G. (2014). Why virginity pledges succeed or fail: The moderating effect of religious commitment versus religious participation. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(6), 1102–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Landor, A. M., Simons, L. G., Simons, R. L., Brody, G. H., Bryant, C. M., Gibbons, F. X., et al. (2013). Exploring the impact of skin tone on family dynamics and race-related outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5), 817–826.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Landor, A. M., Simons, L. G., Simons, R. L., Brody, G. H., & Gibbons, F. X. (2011). The influence of religion on African American adolescents’ risky sexual behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 296–309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Lichter, D. T., Batson, C. D., & Brown, J. B. (2004). Welfare reform and marriage promotion: The marital expectations and desires of single and cohabiting mothers. Social Service Review, 78(1), 2–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maddox, K. B. (2004). Perspectives on racial phenotypicality bias. Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2007). The changing institution of marriage: Adolescents’ expectation to cohabit and to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Martin, P. D., Martin, D., & Martin, M. (2001). Adolescent premarital sexual activity, cohabitation, and attitudes toward marriage. Adolescence, 36, 601–609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Martin, P. D., Specter, G., Martin, D., & Martin, M. (2003). Expressed attitudes of adolescents toward marriage and family life. Adolescence, 38(150), 359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  53. O’Donnell, L., Stueve, A., Wilson-Simmons, R., Dash, K., Agronick, G., & JeanBapstiste, V. (2006). Heterosexual risk behaviors among urban young adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 26, 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paik, A. (2010). The contexts of sexual involvement and concurrent sexual partnerships. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 42, 33–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Phillips, J. A., & Sweeney, M. M. (2005). Premarital cohabitation and marital disruption among White, Black, and Mexican American women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(2), 296–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Raley, R. K. (1996). A shortage of marriageable men? A note on the role of cohabitation in black–white differences in marriage rates. American Sociological Review, 61(6), 973–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Raley, R. K. (2000). Recent trends and differentials in marriage and cohabitation: The United Satates. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 19–39). New York: Adline de Cruyter.Google Scholar
  58. Robinson, T. L., & Ward, J. V. (1995). African American adolescents and skin color. Journal of Black Psychology, 21(3), 256–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rondilla, J. L., & Spickard, P. (2007). Is lighter better?: Skin-tone discrimination among Asian Americans. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  60. Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Porter, M. (2005). “Everything’s there except money”: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3), 680–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thompson, M. S., & Keith, V. M. (2001). The black the berry: Gender, skin tone, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. Gender and Society, 15(3), 336–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United Sates: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1009–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Udry, J. R., Bauman, K. E., & Chase, C. (1971). Skin color, status, and mate selection. American Journal of Sociology, 76(4), 722–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Uecker, J. E., & Stokes, C. E. (2008). Early marriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(4), 835–846.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Waller, M. R., & McLanahan, S. S. (2005). “His” and “her” marriage expectations: Determinants and consequences. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(1), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilder, J., & Cain, C. (2011). Teaching and learning color consciousness in black families: Exploring family processes and women’s experiences with colorism. Journal of Family Issues, 32(5), 577–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Willoughby, B. J., & Carroll, J. S. (2010). Sexual experience and couple formation attitudes among emerging adults. Journal of Adult Development, 17, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Willoughby, B. J., & Carroll, J. S. (2012). Correlates of attitudes toward cohabitation looking at the associations with demographics, relational attitudes, and dating behavior. Journal of Family Issues, 33(11), 1450–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Willoughby, B. J., & Dworkin, J. (2009). The relationships between emerging adults’ expressed desire to marry and frequency of participation in risk behaviors. Youth and Society, 40, 426–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Helfand, M. (2008). Ten years of longitudinal research on U. S. adolescent sexual behavior: Developmental correlates of sexual intercourse and the importance of age, gender, and ethnic background. Developmental Review, 28, 153–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antoinette M. Landor
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carolyn Tucker Halpern
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Human Development and Family ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations