Authoritative School Climate and High School Student Risk Behavior: A Cross-sectional Multi-level Analysis of Student Self-Reports
- 1.7k Downloads
Many adolescents engage in risk behaviors such as substance use and aggression that jeopardize their healthy development. This study tested the hypothesis that an authoritative school climate characterized by strict but fair discipline and supportive teacher–student relationships is conducive to lower risk behavior for high school students. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to analyze cross-sectional, student-report survey data from a statewide sample of 47,888 students (50.6 % female) in 319 high schools. The students included ninth (26.6 %), tenth (25.5 %), eleventh (24.1 %) and twelfth (23.8 %) grade with a racial/ethnic breakdown of 52.2 % White, 18.0 % Black, 13.1 % Hispanic, 5.9 % Asian, and 10.8 % reporting another or two or more race/ethnicities. Schools with an authoritative school climate had lower levels of student-reported alcohol and marijuana use; bullying, fighting, and weapon carrying at school; interest in gang membership; and suicidal thoughts and behavior. These results controlled for demographic variables of student gender, race, grade, and parent education level as well as school size, percentage of minority students, and percentage of low income students. Overall, these findings add new evidence that an authoritative school climate is associated with positive student outcomes.
KeywordsSchool climate Risk behavior Student aggression
We thank Donna Michaelis and Jessica Smith of the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services and Cynthia Cave and Jo Ann Burkholder of the Virginia Department of Education for their support of the Virginia Secondary School Climate Study. We thank members of the project research team including Juliette Berg, Pooja Datta, Anna Heilbrun, Joy Yuane Jia, Timothy Konold, Marisa Malone, Patrick Meyer, and Xiaoxin Wei.
This project was supported by Grant #2012-JF-FX-0062 awarded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice.
DC conceived of the study, participated in its design and implementation, and drafted the manuscript. FH participated in the design and implementation of the study, conceptualized and carried out the data analyses, and helped to draft the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
The authors report no conflict of interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
The survey data used in this study were collected anonymously from students by school personnel as part of school procedures to comply with the state’s annual school safety audit. Parents were informed of the survey and given the option to decline participation for their child. School demographic data were obtained as aggregated school level totals from school records with no identification of individual students.
- Allison, P. (2012). Why you probably need more imputations than you think. Retrieved from http://www.statisticalhorizons.com/more-imputations.
- Baumrind, D. (1968). Authoritarian vs. authoritative parental control. Adolescence, 3, 255–272.Google Scholar
- Brand, S., Felner, R. D., Seitsinger, A., Burns, A., & Bolton, N. (2008). A large scale study of the assessment of the social environment of middle and secondary schools: The validity and utility of teachers’ ratings of school climate, cultural pluralism, and safety problems for understanding school effects and school improvement. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 507–535. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.12.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brand, S., Felner, R., Shim, M., Seitsinger, A., & Dumas, T. (2003). Middle school improvement and reform: Development and validation of a school-level assessment of climate, cultural pluralism, and school safety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 570–588. doi: 10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.1680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Youth risk behavior surveillance system. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/index.htm.
- Cohen, J., McCabe, L., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111, 180–213.Google Scholar
- Cornell, D., Huang, F., Konold, T., Meyer, P., Shukla, K., Heilbrun, A., et al. (2014a). Technical Report of the Virginia Secondary School Climate Survey: 2014 Results for 9th–12th grade students and teachers. Charlottesville, VA: Curry School of Education, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
- Cornell, D., Shukla, K., & Konold, T. (in press). Authoritative school climate and student academic engagement, grades, and aspirations in middle and high schools. AERA Open.Google Scholar
- Dary, T., & Pickeral, T. (Eds.). (2013). School climate: Practices for implementation and sustainability. A school climate practice brief, number 1. New York, NY: National School Climate Center.Google Scholar
- DiClemente, R. J., Santelli, J. S., & Crosby, R. A. (Eds.). (2009). Adolescent health: Understanding and preventing risk behaviors. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Gottfredson, G. D., Gottfredson, D. C., Payne, A. A., & Gottfredson, N. C. (2005). School climate predictors of school disorder: Results from a national study of delinquency prevention in schools. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 412–444. doi: 10.1177/0022427804271931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jia, J., Konold, T., & Cornell, D. (in press). Authoritative school climate and high school dropout rates. School Psychology Quarterly.Google Scholar
- KewalRamani, A., Gilbertson, L., Fox, M. A., & Provasnik, S. (2007). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic minorities (NCES 2007-039). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.Google Scholar
- Lacour, M., & Tissington, L. D. (2011). The effects of poverty on academic achievement. Educational Research and Reviews, 6, 522–527.Google Scholar
- Merlo, J., Chaix, B., Ohlsson, H., Beckman, A., Johnell, K., Hjerpe, P., et al. (2006). A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: Using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 290–297. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.029454.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- National Gang Center. (2015). National youth gang survey analysis. Retrieved from https://www.nationalgangcenter.gov/survey-analysis.
- Nickerson, A. B., & Martens, M. P. (2008). School violence: Associations with control, security/enforcement, educational/therapeutic approaches, and demographic factors. School Psychology Review, 37, 228–243.Google Scholar
- R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Rubin, D. B. (2004). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys (Vol. 81). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Skiba, R., Edl, H., & Rausch, M. (2007). How do principals feel about discipline? The Disciplinary Practices Survey. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
- Swendsen, J., Burstein, M., Case, B., Conway, K. P., Dierker, L., He, J., & Merikangas, K. R. (2012). Use and abuse of alcohol and illicit drugs in US adolescents: Results of the National Comorbidity Survey–Adolescent Supplement. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69, 390–398. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1503.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Sznitman, S. R., & Romer, D. (2014). Student drug testing and positive school climates: Testing the relation between two school characteristics and drug use behavior in a longitudinal study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 75, 65–73. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Dear Colleague letter on the nondiscriminatory administration of school discipline. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201401-title-vi.pdf.
- Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S (Fourth). New York: Springer. Retrieved from http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4.