An Investigation of Short-Term Longitudinal Associations Between Social Anxiety and Victimization and Perpetration of Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying
Previous research has suggested that social anxiety is associated with victimization and perpetration of (cyber)bullying. The direction and causality of this relationship has not yet been empirically supported for both traditional and cyberbullying involvement. This study examined short-term longitudinal associations between feelings of social anxiety and involvement in traditional bullying and cyberbullying among 2128 adolescents aged 10–17 (56.6 % girls). A cross-lagged panel analysis provided evidence for the contribution of social anxiety to later victimization of bullying, both on- and off-line. The possibility of a reciprocal relationship was also examined, although it was not supported. Furthermore, longitudinal bidirectional relationships between social anxiety and the perpetration of bullying were investigated. Only one significant longitudinal association was found: the perpetration of traditional bullying predicted subsequent higher levels of social anxiety. The implications of these findings are discussed.
KeywordsTraditional bullying Cyberbullying Social anxiety Adolescents Cross-lagged panel model
In order to give appropriate credit to each author of the article, we would like to specify the individual contributions. HV conceived of the study, participated in its design and interpretation of the data, and helped to draft the manuscript. SP participated in the design of the study and the data collection, performed the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical issues were considered in the various phases of the present study. Before the data collection, our longitudinal study among adolescents was approved by the review board of our institution, which seeks advice from internal and external reviewers. In preparation of the collection, the staff members at the selected schools were provided with information regarding the study and were asked to cooperate. Participating schools delivered an informational letter describing the research to the students, and (passive) consent was obtained from their parents. We believe that our work follows the APA General Principles and Ethical Standards.
- Aoyama, I. (2010). Cyberbullying: What are the psychological profiles of bullies, victims, and bully-victims? (Doctoral dissertation, Baylor University). http://hdl.handle.net/2104/8018
- Cappadocia, M. C., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. (2013). Cyberbullying: Prevalence, stability, and risk factors during adolescence. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 28(2), 171–192.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 17–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Harman, J. P., Hansen, C. E., Cochran, M. E., & Lindsey, C. R. (2005). Liar, liar: Internet faking but not frequency of use affects social skills, self-esteem, social anxiety, and aggression. Cyberpsychology and Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 8(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heirman, W., Walrave, M., Vandebosch, H., Wegge, D., Eggermont, S., & Pabian, S. (2015). A critical assessment of the mediating role of technology in cyberbullying in a Web 2.0-world. In R. Navarro, S. Yubero, & E. Larranaga (Eds.), Cyberbullying across the globe: Gender, family, and mental health (p. in press). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2001). Self-views and peer perceptions of victim status among early adolescents. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimzed (pp. 105–124). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus 6. Statmodel. www.statmodel.com
- Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
- Pabian, S., & Vandebosch, H. (2015). (Cyber)Bullying perpetration as an impulsive, angry reaction following (cyber)bullying victimization? In M. Walrave, K. Ponnet, E. Vanderhoven, J. Haers, & B. Segaert (Eds.), Youth 2.0—Social media and adolescence: Connecting, sharing and empowering. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2012). Cyberbullying prevention and response: Expert perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Van den Eijnden, R., Vermulst, A., Rooij, A., Scholte, R., & Mheen, D. (2014). The bidirectional relationships between online victimization and psychosocial problems in adolescents: A comparison with real-life victimization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(5), 790–802.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Veenstra, S., Vandebosch, H., & Walrave, M. (2012). Cyberbullying: Defining, understanding and intervening. In E. R. Leukfeldt & W. P. Stol (Eds.), Cyber safety: An introduction (pp. 217–226). Den Haag: Eleven International.Google Scholar
- West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar