Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 637–657 | Cite as

Empathy and Involvement in Bullying in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review

  • Tirza H. J. van NoordenEmail author
  • Gerbert J. T. Haselager
  • Antonius H. N. Cillessen
  • William M. Bukowski
Empirical Research

Abstract

Based on the premise that bullies are deficient in empathy or even lack it completely, bullying prevention and intervention programs often include empathy training. These programs are not always as effective as they aim to be, which may be caused by a failure to acknowledge the multidimensional nature of empathy as well as its complex association with involvement in bullying. To provide a clear overview of the research on the association between empathy and involvement in bullying, this article systematically reviews 40 studies on the association of cognitive empathy (24 studies) and affective empathy (38 studies) with four categories of involvement in bullying: bullying, victimization, defending, and bystanding. The results showed that bullying was negatively associated with cognitive and—in particular—affective empathy. Victimization was negatively associated with cognitive empathy but not with affective empathy. Defending was consistently positively associated with both types of empathy. Contradictory findings were observed in bystanding, with studies reporting both negative and positive associations with cognitive empathy, and studies reporting negative and no associations with affective empathy. Together, the findings stress the importance of the distinction between cognitive and affective empathy in involvement in bullying and suggest different intervention strategies for the four types of involvement in bullying.

Keywords

Systematic review Cognitive empathy Affective empathy Involvement in bullying Children Adolescents 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the National Initiative Brain and Cognition (NIBC) research program Youth and Family of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).

Author contributions

TvN designed and coordinated the study, conducted the literature search and selection, interpretated results, and drafted the manuscript. GH also conducted the literature search and selection, participated in the design and interpretations, and helped to draft the manuscript. AC and WB participated in the design and interpretations, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

References

  1. Almeida, A., Correia, I., Marinho, S., & Garcia, D. (2012). Virtual but not less real: A study of cyberbullying and its relations to moral disengagement and empathy. In Q. Li, D. Cross, & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Cyberbullying in the global playground: Research from international perspectives (pp. 223–244). Oxoford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang, R. P., & Goh, D. H. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 41(4), 387–397. doi: 10.1007/s10578-010-0176-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, J. (2001). A strategic approach to aggression. Social Development, 10(2), 267–271. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barchia, K., & Bussey, K. (2011). Predictors of student defenders of peer aggression victims: Empathy and social cognitive factors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(4), 289–297. doi: 10.1177/0165025410396746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barhight, L. R., Hubbard, J. A., & Hyde, C. T. (2013). Children’s physiological and emotional reactions to witnessing bullying predict bystander intervention. Child Development, 84(1), 375–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01839.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belacchi, C., & Farina, E. (2012). Feeling and thinking of others: Affective and cognitive empathy and emotion comprehension in prosocial/hostile preschoolers. Aggressive Behavior, 38(2), 150–165. doi: 10.1002/ab.21415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellmore, A., Ma, T. L., You, J. I., & Hughes, M. (2012). A two-method investigation of early adolescents’ responses upon witnessing peer victimization in school. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1265–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonino, S., Lo Coco, A., & Tani, F. (1998). Empatia: Processi di condivisione delle emozioni [Empathy: Processes of emotional sharing]. Florence: Giunti.Google Scholar
  9. Bryant, K. B. (1982). An index of empathy for children and adolescents. Child Development, 53(2), 413–425. doi: 10.2307/1128984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cappadocia, M. C., Pepler, D., Cummings, J. G., & Craig, W. (2012). Individual motivations and characteristics associated with bystander intervention during bullying episodes among children and youth. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27(3), 201–216. doi: 10.1177/0829573512450567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18(1), 140–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00465.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Early adolescents’ participation in bullying: Is ToM involved? Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(1), 138–170. doi: 10.1177/0272431609342983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Card, N. A., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2008). Peer victimization among schoolchildren: Correlations, causes, consequences, and considerations in assessment and intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 451–461. doi: 10.1037/a0012769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chaux, E., Castro, L., Daza, J., Díaz, C., & Hurtado, N. (2004). Empatía: Instrumento de autoreporte. Bogota Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar
  15. Chaux, E., Molano, A., & Podlesky, P. (2009). Socio-economic, socio-political and socio-emotional variables explaining school bullying: A country-wide multilevel analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 35(6), 520–529. doi: 10.1002/ab.20320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chlopan, B. E., McCain, M. L., Carbonell, J. L., & Hagan, R. L. (1985). Empathy: Review of available measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(3), 635–653. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.3.635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ciucci, E., & Baroncelli, A. (2013). The emotional core of bullying: Further evidences of the role of callous–unemotional traits and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, Advance online publication,. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.09.033.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, D., & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy in conduct-disordered and comparison youth. Developmental Psychology, 32(6), 988–998. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.32.6.988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., Terry, R., & Wright, V. (1991). The role of aggression in peer relations: An analysis of aggression episodes in boys’ play groups. Child Development, 62(4), 812–826. doi: 10.2307/1131179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coleman, P. K., & Byrd, C. P. (2003). Interpersonal correlates of peer victimization among young adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(4), 301–314. doi: 10.1023/A:1023089028374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cornell, D. G., & Brockenbrough, K. (2004). Identification of bullies and victims: A comparison of methods. Journal of School Violence, 3, 63–87. doi: 10.1300/J202v03n02_05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Correia, I., & Dalbert, C. (2008). School bullying: Belief in a personal just world of bullies, victims, and defenders. European Psychologist, 13(4), 248–254. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1999). ‘Superiority’ is in the eye of the beholder: A comment on Sutton, Smith, and Swettenham. Social Development, 8(1), 128–131. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Damon, W., Lerner, R. M., & Eisenberg, N. (2006). Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.Google Scholar
  26. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dooley, J. J., Pyżalski, J., & Cross, D. (2009). Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 182–188. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1990). Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2), 131–149. doi: 10.1007/BF00991640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 100–131. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91–119. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eisenberg, N., & Strayer, J. (1987). Critical issues in the study of empathy. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 3–13). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Endresen, I. M., & Olweus, D. (2001). Self-reported empathy in Norwegian adolescents: Sex differences, age trends, and relationship to bullying. In A. C. Bohart & D. J. Stipek (Eds.), Constructive & destructive behavior: Implications for family, school, & society (pp. 147–165). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Espelage, D. L., Green, H., & Polanin, J. (2012). Willingness to intervene in bullying episodes among middle school students: Individual and peer-group influences. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 32(6), 776–801. doi: 10.1177/0272431611423017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Espelage, D. L., Mebane, S. E., & Adams, R. S. (2004). Empathy, caring, and bullying: Toward an understanding of complex associations. In D. L. Espelage, & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 37–61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  35. Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2009). School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6, doi: 10.4073/csr.2009.6.
  36. Feshbach, N. D. (1975). Empathy in children: Some theoretical and empirical considerations. The Counseling Psychologist, 5(2), 25–30. doi: 10.1177/001100007500500207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gano-Overway, L. A. (2013). Exploring the connections between caring and social behaviors in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 84(1), 104–114. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2013.762322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Garton, A. F., & Gringart, E. (2005). The development of a scale to measure empathy in 8-and 9-year old children. Australian Journal of Education and Developmental Psychology, 5, 17–25.Google Scholar
  39. Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What’s wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32(6), 528–539. doi: 10.1002/Ab.20153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33(5), 467–476. doi: 10.1002/Ab.20204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2008). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 93–105. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gladden, R. M., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Hamburger, M. E., & Lumpkin, C. D. (2014). Bullying surveillance among youths: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements, Version 1.0. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  43. Gleason, K. A., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Ickes, W. (2009). The role of empathic accuracy in adolescents’ peer relations and adjustment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), 997–1011. doi: 10.1177/0146167209336605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(3), 307–316. doi: 10.1037/h0027580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(5), 441–476. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2003.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006a). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006b). Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32(6), 540–550. doi: 10.1002/Ab.20154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Is low empathy related to bullying after controlling for individual and social background variables? Journal of Adolescence, 34(1), 59–71. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.02.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2001). Self-views versus peer perceptions of victim status among early adolescents. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 105–124). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  51. Kert, A. S., Codding, R. S., Tryon, G. S., & Shiyko, M. (2010). Impact of the word “bully” on the reported rate of bullying behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 47(2), 193–204. doi: 10.1002/pits.20464.Google Scholar
  52. Kokkinos, C. M., & Kipritsi, E. (2012). The relationship between bullying, victimization, trait emotional intelligence, self-efficacy and empathy among preadolescents. Social Psychology of Education, 15(1), 41–58. doi: 10.1007/s11218-011-9168-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Björkqvist, K. A. J., Berts, M., & King, E. (1982). Group aggression among school children in three schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23(1), 45–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1982.tb00412.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lennon, R., & Eisenberg, N. (1987). Gender and age differences in empathy and sympathy. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 195–217). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Lovett, B. J., & Sheffield, R. A. (2007). Affective empathy deficits in aggressive children and adolescents: A critical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.03.003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Malti, T., Perren, S., & Buchmann, M. (2010). Children’s peer victimization, empathy, and emotional symptoms. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 41(1), 98–113. doi: 10.1007/s10578-009-0155-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Miller, P. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1988). The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 324–344. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 264–269. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Muñoz, L., Qualter, P., & Padgett, G. (2011). Empathy and bullying: Exploring the influence of callous-unemotional traits. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 42(2), 183–196. doi: 10.1007/s10578-010-0206-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nickerson, A. B., Mele, D., & Princiotta, D. (2008). Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions. Journal of School Psychology, 46(6), 687–703. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22(4), 437–452. doi: 10.1006/jado.1999.0238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411–448). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  64. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school. What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  65. Olweus, D. (2010). Understanding and researching bullying: Some critical issues. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools. New York: Routhledge.Google Scholar
  66. Olweus, D., & Endresen, I. M. (1998). The importance of sex-of-stimulus object: Age trends and sex differences in empathic responsiveness. Social Development, 7(3), 370–388. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Park, J. H. (2013). Differential correlates of bully/victim status and bystander roles of school violence with school adjustment in Korea. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, Special Issue, 119–133.Google Scholar
  68. Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2000). A longitudinal study of bullying, victimization, and peer affiliation during the transition from primary school to middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 699–725. doi: 10.2307/1163486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 259–280. doi: 10.1348/026151002166442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pettalia, J. L., Levin, E., & Dickinson, J. (2013). Cyberbullying: Eliciting harm without consequence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2758–2765. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Poteat, V. P., DiGiovanni, C. D., & Scheer, J. R. (2013). Predicting homophobic behavior among heterosexual youth: Domain general and sexual orientation-specific factors at the individual and contextual level. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(3), 351–362. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9813-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Poteat, V. P., & Espelage, D. L. (2005). Exploring the relation between bullying and homophobic verbal content: The Homophobic Content Agent Target (HCAT) scale. Violence and Victims, 20(5), 513–528. doi: 10.1891/vivi.2005.20.5.513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pöyhönen, V., Juvonen, J., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). What does it take to stand up for the victim of bullying? The interplay between personal and social factors. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly-Journal of Developmental Psychology, 56(2), 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(04), 515–526. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00076512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Raskauskas, J. L., Gregory, J., Harvey, S. T., Rifshana, F., & Evans, I. M. (2010). Bullying among primary school children in New Zealand: Relationships with prosocial behaviour and classroom climate. Educational Research, 52(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/00131881003588097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Renati, R., Berrone, C., & Zanetti, M. A. (2012). Morally disengaged and unempathic: Do cyberbullies fit these definitions? An exploratory study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(8), 391–398. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rivers, I., & Noret, N. (2010). ‘I h8 u’: findings from a five-year study of text and email bullying. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 643–671. doi: 10.1080/01411920903071918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1:aid-ab1>3.0.co;2-t.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Salmivalli, C., & Peets, K. (2009). Bullies, victims, and bully-victim relationships in middle childhood and early adolescence. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 322–340). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  81. Schultze-Krumbholz, A., & Scheithauer, H. (2009). Social-behavioral correlates of cyberbullying in a German student sample. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 224–226. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schwartz, D., Proctor, L., & Chien, D. (2001). The aggressive victim of bullying: Emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 147–174). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  83. Stassen Berger, K. (2007). Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27(1), 90–126. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2006.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stavrinides, P., Georgiou, S., & Theofanous, V. (2010). Bullying and empathy: A short-term longitudinal investigation. Educational Psychology, 30(7), 793–802. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2010.506004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sticca, F., Ruggieri, S., Alsaker, F., & Perren, S. (2013). Longitudinal risk factors for cyberbullying in adolescence. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 52–67. doi: 10.1002/casp.2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999a). Bullying and ‘theory of mind’: A critique of the ‘social skills deficit’ view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8(1), 117–127. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999b). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 435–450. doi: 10.1348/026151099165384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999c). Socially undesirable need not be incompetent: A response to Crick and Dodge. Social Development, 8(1), 132–134. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Swearer, S. M., Siebecker, A., Johnsen-Frerichs, L., & Wang, C. (2010). Assessment of bullying/victimization: The problem of comparability across studies and across methods. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 305–327). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  90. Thomas, H. J., Connor, J. P., & Scott, J. G. (2014). Integrating traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Challenges of definition and measurement in adolescents—A review. Educational Psychology Review, Advance online publication,. doi: 10.1007/s10648-014-9261-7.Google Scholar
  91. Topcu, Ç., & Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2012). Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying. School Psychology International, 33(5), 550–561. doi: 10.1177/0143034312446882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Bullying: Short-term and long-term effects, and the importance of defiance theory in explanation and prevention. Victims & Offenders, 3(2–3), 289–312. doi: 10.1080/15564880802143397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vezzali, L., Capozza, D., Stathi, S., & Giovannini, D. (2012). Increasing outgroup trust, reducing infrahumanization, and enhancing future contact intentions via imagined intergroup contact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 437–440. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., & Nansel, T. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4), 368–375. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Warden, D., & Mackinnon, S. (2003). Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social problem-solving strategies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Williford, A., Boulton, A. J., & Jenson, J. M. (2014). Transitions between subclasses of bullying and victimization when entering middle school. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 24–41. doi: 10.1002/ab.21503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Woods, S., Wolke, D., Nowicki, S., & Hall, L. (2009). Emotion recognition abilities and empathy of victims of bullying. Child Abuse and Neglect, 33(5), 307–311. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.11.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zhou, Q., Valiente, C., & Eisenberg, N. (2003). Empathy and its measurement. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 269–284). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tirza H. J. van Noorden
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gerbert J. T. Haselager
    • 1
  • Antonius H. N. Cillessen
    • 1
  • William M. Bukowski
    • 2
  1. 1.Behavioural Science InstituteRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Centre de Recherche sur Développement HumainConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations