From the School Yard to the Squad Car: School Discipline, Truancy, and Arrest
- 3.4k Downloads
Since the 1990’s, implementation of zero tolerance policies in schools has led to increased use of school suspension and expulsion as disciplinary techniques for students with varying degrees of infractions. An unintended consequence of zero tolerance policies is that school suspension or expulsion may increase risk for contact with the juvenile justice system. In the present study, we test how forced absence from school via suspension or expulsion and chosen absence from school (truancy) are associated with the likelihood of being arrested. Using month-level data from 6,636 months from a longitudinal study of delinquent adolescents (N = 1,354; 13.5 % female; 41.5 % Black, 33.5 % Hispanic-American, 20.2 % White), we compare the likelihood of being arrested, within individuals, for months when youth were and were not suspended or expelled from school and for months when youth were and were not truant. Finally, we test if these associations were moderated by stable demographic characteristics (sex, race, age, history of problem behaviors) and time-varying contextual factors (peer delinquency, parental monitoring, and commitment to school). Being suspended or expelled from school increased the likelihood of arrest in that same month and this effect was stronger among youth who did not have a history of behavior problems and when youth associated with less delinquent peers. Truancy independently contributed to the likelihood of arrest, but this association was explained by differences in parental monitoring and school commitment. Thus, school disciplinary action places youth at risk for involvement in the juvenile justice system and this may be especially true for less risky youth.
KeywordsSchool suspension School expulsion Truancy Arrest Zero tolerance
The project described was supported by funds from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2005-JK-FX-K001), National Institute of Justice (2008-IJ-CX-0023), John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, William T. Grant Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, William Penn Foundation, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant R01 DA 019697 05, Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency, and the Arizona Governor’s Justice Commission. We are grateful for their support. The content of this manuscript, however, is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of these agencies.
KM conceived of the study, performed the statistical analyses, and coordinated and drafted the manuscript. SV assisted in the conceptual framework and statistical analyses and drafting of the manuscript. JB participated in the conceptual framework of the study, reviewed statistical analyses, and assisted in the drafting of the manuscript. EC was a Principal Investigator on the project and participated in the study design and data collection, provided conceptual insight on the study, and assisted in drafting of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
- Aud, S., KewalRamani, A., Frohlich, L. (2011). America’s youth: Transitions to adulthood (NCES 2012-026). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Bushway, S., & Reuter, P. (2002). Labor markets and crime risk factors. In L. Sherman, D. Farrington, B. Welsh, & D. MacKenzie (Eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 198–240). New York: Rutledge Press.Google Scholar
- Caspi, A., & Amell, J. (1994). The reliability of life history calendar data: DPPP technical report no. 94–01. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
- Cohen, L.E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2094589.
- Dupper, D. R., & Bosch, L. A. (1996). Reasons for school suspensions: An examination of data from one school district and recommendations for reducing suspensions. Journal of Just and Caring Education, 2, 140–159.Google Scholar
- Felson, M. (1998). Crime and everyday life: Impact and implications for society. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge.Google Scholar
- Forth, A., Kosson, D., & Hare, R. (2003). The hare psychopathy checklist: Youth version, technical manual. New York: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.Google Scholar
- Hemphill, S. A., Tombourou, J. W., Herrenkohl, T. I., McMorris, B. J., & Catalano, R. F. (2006). The effect of school suspensions and arrests on subsequent adolescent antisocial behavior in Australia and the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(5), 736–744. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.05.010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hirschfield, P. (2004). Impact of juvenile justice involvement on educational outcomes. Research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/206047.p.
- Lahey, B. B., Van Hulle, C. A., D’Onofrio, B. M., Rodgers, J. L., & Waldman, I. D. (2008). Is parental knowledge of their adolescent offspring’s whereabouts and peer associations spuriously associated with offspring delinquency? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(6), 807–823. doi: 10.1007/s10802-008-9214-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Laird, R. D., Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (2005). Peer relationship antecedents of delinquent behavior in late adolescence: Is there evidence of demographic group differences in developmental processes? Development and Psychopathology, 17(1), 127–144. doi: 10.1017/S0954579405050078.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morrison, G. M., Anthony, S., Storino, M. H., Cheng, J. J., Furlong, M. J., & Morrison, R. L. (2001). School expulsion as a process and an event: Before and after effects on children at risk for school discipline. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 2001(92), 45–71.Google Scholar
- Osgood, D. W., Anderson, A. L., & Shaffer, J. N. (2005). Unstructured leisure in the after-school hours. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 45–64). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Raffaele-Mendez, L. M., & Knoff, H. M. (2003). Who gets suspended from school and why: A demographic analysis of schools and disciplinary infractions in a large school district. Education and Treatment of Children, 26(1), 30–51.Google Scholar
- Schubert, C. A., Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., Losoya, S. H., Hecker, T., et al. (2004). Operational lessons from the pathways to desistance project. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(3), 237–255.Google Scholar
- Skiba, R. J., & Knesting, K. (2001). Zero tolerance, zero evidence: An analysis of school disciplinary practice. In R. J. Skiba & G. G. Noam (Eds.), Zero tolerance: Can suspension and expulsion keep schools safe? (pp. 17–43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Office of juvenile justice and delinquency prevention.Google Scholar
- Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Dornbusch, S., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement. Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63, 1266–1281. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01694.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., Wei, E., Farrington, D. P., & Wilkstrom, P. H. (2002). Risk and promotive effects in the explanation of persistent serious delinquency in boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(1), 111–123. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.70.1.111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wald, J., & Losen, D. J. (2003). Defining and redirecting a school-to-prison pipeline. In J. Wald & D. J. Losen (Eds.), New directions for youth development (Vol. 99, pp. 9–15)., Deconstructing the school-to-prison pipeline San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Wallace Jr, J. M., Goodkind, S., Wallace, C. M., & Bachman, J. G. (2008). Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in school discipline among US high school students: 1991–2005. The Negro Educational Review, 59(1–2), 47–62.Google Scholar