Identity Styles, Positive Youth Development, and Civic Engagement in Adolescence
Identity formation is a core developmental task of adolescence. Adolescents can rely on different social-cognitive styles to seek, process, and encode self-relevant information: information-oriented, normative, and diffuse-avoidant identity styles. The reliance on different styles might impact adolescents’ adjustment and their active involvement in the society. The purpose of this study was to examine whether adolescents with different identity styles report differences in positive youth development (analyzed with the Five Cs—Competence, Confidence, Character, Connection, and Caring—model) and in various forms of civic engagement (i.e., involvement in school self-government activities, volunteering activities, youth political organizations, and youth non-political organizations). The participants were 1,633 (54.1 % female) 14–19 years old adolescents (M age = 16.56, SD age = 1.22). The findings indicated that adolescents with different identity styles differed significantly on all the Five Cs and on two (i.e., involvement in volunteering activities and in youth non-political organizations) forms of civic engagement. Briefly, adolescents with an information-oriented style reported high levels of both the Five Cs and civic engagement; participants with a normative style reported moderate to high scores on the Five Cs but low rates of civic engagement; diffuse-avoidant respondents scored low both on the Five Cs and on civic engagement. These findings suggest that the information-oriented style, contrary to the diffuse-avoidant one, has beneficial effects for both the individual and the community, while the normative style has quite beneficial effects for the individual but not for his/her community. Concluding, adolescents with different identity styles display meaningful differences in positive youth development and in rates of civic engagement.
KeywordsIdentity styles Positive youth development Five Cs Civic engagement Gender
This research was funded by the European Social Fund under the Global Grant measure, VP1-3.1-ŠMM-07-K-02-008.
E.C. conceived of the current study, performed the statistical analyses, and wrote the manuscript; R.E. participated in the data preparation and in the drafting of the article; R.Z. is the principal investigator of the POSIDEV project from which data for the current study were drawn and she participated in the interpretation of the results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
- Adams, G. R., Munro, B., Doherty-Poirer, M., Munro, G., Petersen, A.-M. R., & Edwards, J. (2001). Diffuse-avoidance, normative, and informational identity styles: Using identity theory to predict maladjustment. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1, 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Crocetti, E., Cherubini, E., & Palmonari, A. (2011). Social support and identity styles in adolescence. Psicologia Clinica Dello Sviluppo, 15, 353–377.Google Scholar
- Erentaitė, R., & Raiziene, S. (2013). Lithuanian validation of the measure of positive youth development (manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
- Erikson, E. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Havighurst, R. J. (1952). Developmental tasks and education. New York: Davis McKay.Google Scholar
- Lerner, R. M. (2004). Liberty: Thriving and civic engagement among American youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lerner, R. (2010). Scoring protocol: Measure of PYD (4H study of PYD). Unpublished manual. Institute for applied Research in Youth Development, Tufts University, Medford, USA.Google Scholar
- Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdottir, S., et al. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 17–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. J., & Pantin, H. (2006). Identity development in adolescence and emerging adulthood: The interface of self, context, and culture. In A. Prescott (Ed.), The concept of self in psychology (pp. 45–85). Hauppage, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Seabi, J. (2009). Relating identity processing styles to commitment and self-esteem among college students. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 19, 309–314.Google Scholar
- Sherrod, L. R., Flanagan, C., Kassimir, R., & Syvertsen, A. (2005). Youth activism: An international encyclopedia. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- Smits, I., Soenens, B., Berzonsky, M., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Kunnen, S., et al. (2009). The Identity Style Inventory—version 4: A cross-national study in scale development and validation. In Smits I. (Ed.), Identity styles in adolescence: Measurement and associations with perceived parenting, personal well-being, and interpersonal functioning (pp. 57–105). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
- Walker, T. (2000). The service/politics split: Rethinking service to teach political engagement. PS: Political Science and Politics, 33, 646–649.Google Scholar
- Youniss, J., & Levine, P. (Eds.). (2009). Engaging young people in civic life. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar