Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 43, Issue 11, pp 1818–1828 | Cite as

Identity Styles, Positive Youth Development, and Civic Engagement in Adolescence

  • Elisabetta Crocetti
  • Rasa Erentaitė
  • Rita Žukauskienė
Empirical Research

Abstract

Identity formation is a core developmental task of adolescence. Adolescents can rely on different social-cognitive styles to seek, process, and encode self-relevant information: information-oriented, normative, and diffuse-avoidant identity styles. The reliance on different styles might impact adolescents’ adjustment and their active involvement in the society. The purpose of this study was to examine whether adolescents with different identity styles report differences in positive youth development (analyzed with the Five Cs—Competence, Confidence, Character, Connection, and Caring—model) and in various forms of civic engagement (i.e., involvement in school self-government activities, volunteering activities, youth political organizations, and youth non-political organizations). The participants were 1,633 (54.1 % female) 14–19 years old adolescents (Mage = 16.56, SDage = 1.22). The findings indicated that adolescents with different identity styles differed significantly on all the Five Cs and on two (i.e., involvement in volunteering activities and in youth non-political organizations) forms of civic engagement. Briefly, adolescents with an information-oriented style reported high levels of both the Five Cs and civic engagement; participants with a normative style reported moderate to high scores on the Five Cs but low rates of civic engagement; diffuse-avoidant respondents scored low both on the Five Cs and on civic engagement. These findings suggest that the information-oriented style, contrary to the diffuse-avoidant one, has beneficial effects for both the individual and the community, while the normative style has quite beneficial effects for the individual but not for his/her community. Concluding, adolescents with different identity styles display meaningful differences in positive youth development and in rates of civic engagement.

Keywords

Identity styles Positive youth development Five Cs Civic engagement Gender 

References

  1. Adams, G. R., Munro, B., Doherty-Poirer, M., Munro, G., Petersen, A.-M. R., & Edwards, J. (2001). Diffuse-avoidance, normative, and informational identity styles: Using identity theory to predict maladjustment. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1, 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, G. R., Munro, B., Munro, G., Doherty-Poirer, M., & Edwards, J. (2005). Identity processing styles and Canadian adolescents’ self-reported delinquency. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 5, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by “civic engagement”? Journal of Transformative Education, 3, 236–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Keeter, S., & Zukin, C. (2002). Searching for the meaning of youth civic engagement: Notes from the field. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beaumont, S. L. (2009). Identity processing and personal wisdom: An information-oriented identity style predicts self-actualization and self-transcendence. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 9, 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berzonsky, M. D. (1989). Identity style: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Adolescent Research, 4, 268–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berzonsky, M. D. (1994). Self-identity: The relationship between process and content. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berzonsky, M. D. (2003). Identity style and well-being: Does commitment matter? Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 3, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berzonsky, M. D. (2011). A social-cognitive perspective on identity construction. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 55–76). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berzonsky, M. D., & Ferrari, J. R. (1996). Identity style and decisional strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berzonsky, M. D., & Kuk, L. S. (2005). Identity style, psychosocial maturity, and academic performance. Personal and Individual Differences, 39, 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berzonsky, M. D., Macek, P., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2003). Interrelations among identity process, content, and structure: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 112–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berzonsky, M. D., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., Smits, I., Papini, D. R., & Goossens, L. (2013). Development and validation of the revised Identity Style Inventory (ISI-5): Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 25, 893–904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berzonsky, M. D., & Sullivan, C. (1992). Social-cognitive aspects of identity style. Need for cognition, experiential openness, and introspection. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 140–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Beunen, G., Thomis, M., Maes, H. H., Loos, R., Malina, R. M., Claessens, A. L., et al. (2000). Genetic variance of adolescent growth in stature. Annals of Human Biology, 27, 173–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bosch, L. A., & Card, N. A. (2012). A meta-analytic review of Berzonsky’s Identity Style Inventory (ISI). Journal of Adolescence, 35, 333–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bowers, E. P., Li, Y., Kiely, M. K., Brittian, A., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). The Five Cs model of positive youth development: A longitudinal analysis of confirmatory factor structure and measurement invariance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 720–735.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Boyd, V. S., Hunt, P. F., Kandell, J. J., & Lucas, M. S. (2003). Relationship between identity processing style and academic success in undergraduate students. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  20. Cicognani, E., Klimstra, T., & Goossens, L. (2013). Sense of community, identity statuses, and loneliness in adolescence: A cross-national study on Italian and Belgian youth. Journal of Community Psychology. doi:10.1002/jcop.21618.Google Scholar
  21. Cicognani, E., Pirini, C., Keyes, C., Joshanloo, M., Rostami, R., & Nosratabadi, M. (2008). Social participation, sense of community and social well-being: A study on American, Italian and Iranian university students. Social Indicator Research, 89, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crocetti, E., Cherubini, E., & Palmonari, A. (2011). Social support and identity styles in adolescence. Psicologia Clinica Dello Sviluppo, 15, 353–377.Google Scholar
  23. Crocetti, E., Jahromi, P., & Meeus, W. (2012). Identity and civic engagement in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 521–532.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Crocetti, E., Rubini, M., Berzonsky, M. D., & Meeus, W. (2009). The Identity Style Inventory: Validation in Italian adolescents and college students. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 425–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Crocetti, E., & Shokri, O. (2010). Iranian validation of the Identity Style Inventory. International Journal of Testing, 10, 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crocetti, E., Sica, L. S., Schwartz, S. J., Serafini, T., & Meeus, W. (2013). Identity styles, processes, statuses, and functions: Making connections among identity dimensions. European Review of Applied Psychology, 63, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Damon, W. (2004). What is positive youth development? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dollinger, S. M. (1995). Identity styles and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 475–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dunkel, C. S., Papini, D. R., & Berzonsky, M. D. (2008). Explaining differences in identity styles: Possible roles of personality and family functioning. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 8, 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Duriez, B., Soenens, B., & Beyers, W. (2004). Personality, identity styles, and religiosity: An integrative study among late adolescents in Flanders (Belgium). Journal of Personality, 72, 877–910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Erentaitė, R., & Raiziene, S. (2013). Lithuanian validation of the measure of positive youth development (manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
  32. Erikson, E. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  33. Esser, F., & de Vreese, C. H. (2007). Comparing young voters’ political engagement in the United States and Europe. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1195–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Geldhof, G. J., Bowers, E. P., & Lerner, R. M. (2013). Special section introduction: Thriving in context: Findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J., Jeffries, N. O., Castellanos, F. X., Liu, H., Zijdenbos, A., et al. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 861–863.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hardy, S. A., Pratt, M. W., Pancer, S. M., Olsen, J. A., & Lawford, H. L. (2010). Community and religious involvement as contexts of identity change across late adolescence and emerging adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Havighurst, R. J. (1952). Developmental tasks and education. New York: Davis McKay.Google Scholar
  38. Jahromi, P., Crocetti, E., & Buchanan, C. (2012). A cross-cultural examination of adolescent civic engagement: Comparing Italian and American volunteerism and political involvement. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 40, 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Klimstra, T., Hale, W. W. I. I. I., Raaijmakers, Q., Branje, S., & Meeus, W. (2010). Identity formation in adolescence: Change or stability? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 150–162.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Krettenauer, T. (2005). The role of epistemic cognition in adolescent identity formation: Further evidence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kroger, J. (2004). Identity in adolescence: The balance between self and other (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lerner, R. M. (2004). Liberty: Thriving and civic engagement among American youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Lerner, R. (2010). Scoring protocol: Measure of PYD (4H study of PYD). Unpublished manual. Institute for applied Research in Youth Development, Tufts University, Medford, USA.Google Scholar
  45. Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdottir, S., et al. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 17–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lerner, J. V., Phelps, E., Forman, Y., & Bowers, E. P. (2009). Positive youth development. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Individual bases of adolescent development (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 524–558). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Luyckx, K., Lens, W., Smits, I., & Goossens, L. (2010). Time perspective and identity formation: Short-term longitudinal dynamics in college students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34, 238–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Matheis, S., & Adams, G. R. (2004). Family climate and identity style during late adolescence. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 4, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  50. Nurmi, J. E., Berzonsky, M. D., Tammi, K., & Kinney, A. (1997). Identity processing orientation, cognitive and behavioural strategies and well-being. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 21, 555–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pancer, M. S., Pratt, M., Hunsberger, B., & Alisat, S. (2007). Community and political involvement in adolescence: What distinguishes the activists from the uninvolved? Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 741–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Passmore, N. L., Fogarty, G. J., Bourke, C. J., & Baker-Evans, S. F. (2005). Parental bonding and identity style as correlates of self-esteem among adult adoptees and nonadoptees. Family Relations, 54, 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Phillips, T. M., & Pittman, J. F. (2007). Adolescent psychological well-being by identity style. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 1021–1034.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Porter, R. I. (2010). Invited commentary: The positive youth development perspective is an exciting direction for adolescent and family policies and programs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 839–842.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roth, J. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). What exactly is a youth development program? Answers from research and practice. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schwartz, S. J. (2005). A new identity for identity research: Recommendations for expanding and refocusing the identity literature. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20, 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schwartz, S. J., & Pantin, H. (2006). Identity development in adolescence and emerging adulthood: The interface of self, context, and culture. In A. Prescott (Ed.), The concept of self in psychology (pp. 45–85). Hauppage, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  58. Seabi, J. (2009). Relating identity processing styles to commitment and self-esteem among college students. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 19, 309–314.Google Scholar
  59. Seaton, C. L., & Beaumont, S. L. (2008). Individual differences in identity styles predict proactive forms of positive adjustment. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 8, 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sherrod, L. (2007). Civic engagement as an expression of positive youth development. In R. Silbereisen & R. Lerner (Eds.), Approaches to positive youth development (pp. 59–75). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sherrod, L. R., Flanagan, C., Kassimir, R., & Syvertsen, A. (2005). Youth activism: An international encyclopedia. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  62. Smits, I., Doumen, S., Luyckx, K., Duriez, B., & Goossens, L. (2011). Identity styles and interpersonal behavior in emerging adulthood: The intervening role of empathy. Social Development, 20, 664–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smits, I., Soenens, B., Berzonsky, M., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Kunnen, S., et al. (2009). The Identity Style Inventory—version 4: A cross-national study in scale development and validation. In Smits I. (Ed.), Identity styles in adolescence: Measurement and associations with perceived parenting, personal well-being, and interpersonal functioning (pp. 57–105). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
  64. Soenens, B., Duriez, B., & Goossens, L. (2005). Social-psychological profiles of identity styles: Attitudinal and social-cognitive correlates in late adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 107–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Streitmatter, J. (1993). Identity status and identity style: A replication study. Journal of Adolescence, 16, 211–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vleioras, G., & Bosma, H. A. (2005). Are identity styles important for psychological well-being? Journal of Adolescence, 28, 397–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Walker, T. (2000). The service/politics split: Rethinking service to teach political engagement. PS: Political Science and Politics, 33, 646–649.Google Scholar
  68. Wheeler, H. A., Adams, G. R., & Keating, L. (2001). Binge eating as a means for evading identity issues: The association between an avoidance identity style and bulimic behavior. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. White, J. M., & Jones, R. M. (1996). Identity styles of male inmates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 490–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Youniss, J., & Levine, P. (Eds.). (2009). Engaging young people in civic life. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabetta Crocetti
    • 1
  • Rasa Erentaitė
    • 2
  • Rita Žukauskienė
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Centre Adolescent DevelopmentUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute of PsychologyMykolas Romeris UniversityVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations