Demolishing the Competition: The Longitudinal Link Between Competitive Video Games, Competitive Gambling, and Aggression
- 3.8k Downloads
The majority of research on the link between video games and aggression has focused on the violent content in games. In contrast, recent experimental research suggests that it is video game competition, not violence, that has the greatest effect on aggression in the short-term. However, no researchers have examined the long-term relationship between video game competition and aggression. In addition, if competition in video games is a significant reason for the link between video game play and aggression, then other competitive activities, such as competitive gambling, also may predict aggression over time. In the current study, we directly assessed the socialization (competitive video game play and competitive gambling predicts aggression over time) versus selection hypotheses (aggression predicts competitive video game play and competitive gambling over time). Adolescents (N = 1,492, 50.8 % female) were surveyed annually from Grade 9 to Grade 12 about their video game play, gambling, and aggressive behaviors. Greater competitive video game play and competitive gambling predicted higher levels of aggression over time, after controlling for previous levels of aggression, supporting the socialization hypothesis. The selection hypothesis also was supported, as aggression predicted greater competitive video game play and competitive gambling over time, after controlling for previous competitive video game play and competitive gambling. Our findings, taken together with the fact that millions of adolescents play competitive video games every day and that competitive gambling may increase as adolescents transition into adulthood, highlight the need for a greater understanding of the relationship between competition and aggression.
KeywordsCompetition Aggression Video games Adolescent development Longitudinal
- Anderson, C. A., Ihori, N., Bushman, B. J., Rothsetin, H. R., Shibuya, A., Swing, E. L., et al. (2010). Video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior and eastern and western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 151–173. doi:10.1037/a0018251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Arbuckle, J. L. (1995-2010). AMOS 19 user’s guide. Crawford, FL: AMOS Development Corporation.Google Scholar
- Biscotti, F., Blau, B., Lovelock, J.-D., Nguyen, T. H., Erensen, J., Verma, S., & Liu, V. (2011). Market trends: Gaming ecosystem, 2011. Retrieved from Gartner Newsroom: http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1737414.
- Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., & Lynam, D. (2006). Aggression and antisocial behavior in youth. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed.): Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, pp. 719–788). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ferguson, C. J., & Ivory, J. D. (2012). A futile game: On the prevalence and causes of misguided speculation about the role of violent video games in mass school shootings. In G. W. Muschert & J. Sumiala (Eds.), School shootings: Mediated violence in a global age (pp. 47–67). Bringley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths, M. D., Parke, A., & Parke, J. (2003). Violence in gambling environments: A cause for concern? Justice of the Peace, 167, 424–426.Google Scholar
- Lenhart, A., Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., Macgill, A. R., Evans, C., & Vitak, J. (2008). Teens, video games, and civics. (Report No. 202-415-4500). Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
- Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Marini, Z., Spear, S., & Bombay, K. (1999). Peer victimization in middle childhood: Characteristics, causes, and consequences of bullying. Brock Education, 9, 32–47.Google Scholar
- Zillmann, D. (1983). Arousal and aggression. In R. G. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Aggression: Theoretical and empirical reviews: Vol. 1. Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 75–101). New York: Academic.Google Scholar