Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 42, Issue 7, pp 1063–1077 | Cite as

The Rate of Cyber Dating Abuse Among Teens and How It Relates to Other Forms of Teen Dating Violence

  • Janine M. ZweigEmail author
  • Meredith Dank
  • Jennifer Yahner
  • Pamela Lachman
Empirical Research

Abstract

To date, little research has documented how teens might misuse technology to harass, control, and abuse their dating partners. This study examined the extent of cyber dating abuse—abuse via technology and new media—in youth relationships and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. A total of 5,647 youth from ten schools in three northeastern states participated in the survey, of which 3,745 reported currently being in a dating relationship or having been in one during the prior year (52 % were female; 74 % White). Just over a quarter of youth in a current or recent relationship said that they experienced some form of cyber dating abuse victimization in the prior year, with females reporting more cyber dating abuse victimization than males (particularly sexual cyber dating abuse). One out of ten youth said that they had perpetrated cyber dating abuse, with females reporting greater levels of non-sexual cyber dating abuse perpetration than males; by contrast, male youth were significantly more likely to report perpetrating sexual cyber dating abuse. Victims of sexual cyber dating abuse were seven times more likely to have also experienced sexual coercion (55 vs. 8 %) than were non-victims, and perpetrators of sexual cyber dating abuse were 17 times more likely to have also perpetrated sexual coercion (34 vs. 2 %) than were non-perpetrators. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

Keywords

Teen dating violence Cyber dating abuse Victimization Perpetration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by Award No. 2010-WG-BX-003, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions and recommendations expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice, or of the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Elements of this paper were reported to the National Institute of Justice in the form of a final technical report as per grant obligations. The authors would like to thank: (1) the administrators, faculty, and staff of schools who assisted us in collecting the data documented in this report, (2) CJ Pascoe of Colorado College and Cindy Southworth, Erica Olsen, and Sarah Tucker of the National Network to End Domestic Violence for their input on survey measures, and (3) the National Institute of Justice and Dr. Nancy La Vigne, Director of the Urban Institute’s Justice Policy Center, for their careful review of project findings.

Author contributions

JZ is co-Principal Investigator of the study and helped guide substantive decisions regarding survey development, measurement development, conceptualization of the research questions, and direction of research. She is primary author of the manuscript, drafting the literature review, methods, and portions of the discussion. MD is co-Principal Investigator of the study and helped guide substantive decisions regarding survey development, measurement development, conceptualization of the research questions, and direction of research. She also drafted portions of the discussion. JY participated in conceptualization of measures, research questions, and direction of analyses. She drafted portions of the results section. PL participated in conceptualization of measures, research questions, and direction of analyses. She conducted analyses and drafted portions of the results section. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

References

  1. Ackard, D. M., Neumark-Sztainer, D., & Hannan, P. (2003). Dating violence among a nationally representative sample of adolescent girls and boys: Associations with behavioral and mental health. Journal of Gender Specific Medicine, 6(3), 39–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Borowsky, I. W., Hogan, M., & Ireland, M. (1997). Adolescent sexual aggression: Risk and protective factors. Pediatrics, 100(6), e7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Canadian Housing, Family, and Social Statistics Division. (1999). General Social Survey. Canada.Google Scholar
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61(4), 1–166. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6104.pdf.
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Cutbush, S., Ashley, O. S., Kan., M. L., Hampton, J., & Hall, D. M. (2010). Electronic aggression among adolescent dating partners: Demographic correlates and associations with other types of violence. Poster presented at the American Public Health Association, annual meeting, November 6–10, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  7. Cutbush, S., Williams, J., Miller, S., Gibbs, D., & Clinton-Sherrod, M., (2012). Electronic dating aggression among middle school students: demographic correlates and associations with other types of violence. Poster presented at the American Public Health Association, annual meeting, October 27–31, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Draucker, C. B., & Martsolf, D. S. (2010). The role of electronic communication technology in adolescent dating violence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 23(3), 133–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ebesutani, C., Bernstein, A., Martinez, J. I., Chorpita, B. F., & Weisz, J. R. (2011). The youth self report: Applicability and validity across younger and older youths. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40(2), 338–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fergusson, D. M., Boden, J. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2008). Developmental antecedents of interpartner violence in a New Zealand birth cohort. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 737–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foshee, V. A. (1996). Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types and injuries. Health Education Research, Theory and Practice, 11(3), 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Linder, R., Rice, J., & Wilcher, R. (2007). Typologies of adolescent dating violence: Identifying typologies of adolescent dating violence perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(5), 498–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furlong, M. J., Morrison, G. M., Cornell, D. G., & Skiba, R. (2004). Methodological and measurement issues in school violence research: Moving beyond the social problem era. Journal of School Violence, 3(2/3), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griezel, L. (2007). Out of the schoolyard and into cyber space: Elucidating the nature and psychosocial consequences of traditional and cyber bullying for Australian secondary students. Unpublished honours thesis, University of Western Sydney, Sydney.Google Scholar
  15. Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(8), 496–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lenhart, A. (2012). Teens, smartphones, and texting. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  17. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickurh, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  18. Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). 2010 social media and young adults. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  19. Michigan Department of Community Health. (1997). Survey of violence against women in Michigan. Poster presented at American Public Health Association annual meeting, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
  20. Mulford, C., & Giordano, P. M. (2008). Teen dating violence: A closer look at adolescent romantic relationships. National Institute of Justice Journal, 261.Google Scholar
  21. O’Leary, K. D., Smith Slep, A. M., Avery-Leaf, S., & Cascardi, M. (2008). Gender differences in dating aggression among multiethnic high school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 473–479.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Picard, P. (2007). Tech abuse in teen relationships. Chicago, IL: Teen Research Unlimited. http://www.loveisrespect.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/liz-claiborne-2007-tech-relationship-abuse.pdf. Accessed March 24, 2011.
  23. Quinn, R., (2012). Police seek crime tips via text messages. The State Journal. http://www.state-journal.com/latest%20headlines/2012/11/02/police-seek-crime-tips-via-text-messages. November 2, 2012.
  24. Reeves, P. M., & Orpinas, P. (2012). Dating norms and dating violence among ninth graders in Northeast Georgia: Reports from student surveys and focus groups. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(9), 1677–1698.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Renner, L. M., & Whitney, S. D. (2010). Examining symmetry in intimate partner violence among young adults using socio-demographic characteristics. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rideout, V., Roberts, D., & Foehr, U. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8–18 year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  27. Ridge, N. W., Warren, J. S., Burlingame, G. M., Wells, M. G., & Tumblin, K. M. (2009). Reliability and validity of the youth outcome questionnaire self-report. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(10), 1115–1126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosenblatt, J. A., & Furlong, M. J. (1997). Assessing the reliability and validity of student self-reports of campus violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(2), 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. RTI International. (2012). Prevention in middle school matters: A summary of findings on teen dating violence behaviors and associated risk factors among 7th-grade students. Research Triangle, NC: RTI International.Google Scholar
  30. Sugarman, D. B., & Hotaling, G. T. (1997). Intimate violence and social desirability: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(2), 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walsh, C. A., MacMillan, H. L., Trocmé, N., Jamieson, E., & Boyle, M. H. (2008). Measurement of victimization in adolescence: Development and validation of the Childhood Experiences of Violence Questionnaire. Child Abuse and Neglect, 32(11), 1037–1057.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Young, A. M., Grey, M., & Boyd, C. J. (2009a). Adolescents’ experiences of sexual assault by peers: Prevalence and nature of victimization occurring within and outside of school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1072–1083.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Young, A. M., King, L., Abbey, A., & Boyd, C. J. (2009b). Adolescent peer-on-peer sexual aggression: Characteristics of aggressors of alcohol and non-alcohol related assault. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70(5), 700–703.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Zweig, J. M., Barber, B. L., & Eccles, J. S. (1997). Sexual coercion and well-being in young adulthood: Comparisons by gender and college status. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(2), 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zweig, J. M., Sayer, A., Crockett, L. J., & Vicary, J. R. (2002). Adolescent risk factors for sexual victimization: A longitudinal analysis of rural women. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17(6), 586–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janine M. Zweig
    • 1
    Email author
  • Meredith Dank
    • 1
  • Jennifer Yahner
    • 1
  • Pamela Lachman
    • 1
  1. 1.Urban InstituteJustice Policy CenterWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations