Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 698–710 | Cite as

Individual and Contextual Predictors of Cyberbullying: The Influence of Children’s Provictim Attitudes and Teachers’ Ability to Intervene

  • L. Christian Elledge
  • Anne Williford
  • Aaron J. Boulton
  • Kathryn J. DePaolis
  • Todd D. Little
  • Christina Salmivalli
Empirical Research

Abstract

Electronic social communication has provided a new context for children to bully and harass their peers and it is clear that cyberbullying is a growing public health concern in the US and abroad. The present study examined individual and contextual predictors of cyberbullying in a sample of 16, 634 students in grades 3–5 and 7–8. Data were obtained from a large cluster-randomized trial of the KiVa antibullying program that occurred in Finland between 2007 and 2009. Students completed measures at pre-intervention assessing provictim attitudes (defined as children’s beliefs that bullying is unacceptable, victims are acceptable, and defending victims is valued), perceptions of teachers’ ability to intervene in bullying, and cyberbullying behavior. Students with higher scores on provictim attitudes reported lower frequencies of cyberbullying. This relationship was true for individual provictim attitudes as well as the collective attitudes of students within classrooms. Teachers’ ability to intervene assessed at the classroom level was a unique, positive predictor of cyberbullying. Classrooms in which students collectively considered their teacher as capable of intervening to stop bullying had higher mean levels of cyberbullying frequency. Our findings suggest that cyberbullying and other indirect or covert forms of bullying may be more prevalent in classrooms where students collectively perceive their teacher’s ability to intervene in bullying as high. We found no evidence that individual or contextual effects were conditional on age or gender. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Keywords

Cyberbullying Provictim attitudes Teacher intervention Youth Adolescence 

Notes

Author Contributions

LCE conceived of the study and helped to draft the introduction, methods, results, and discussion as well as contributed to the revision of the introduction, methods, and discussion; AW conceived of the study and drafted the introduction and discussion as well as contributed to the revision of the introduction, methods and discussion; AB performed the statistical analysis, lead the interpretation of the results and drafted the methods and results sections as well as to the revision of the introduction, methods, and discussion; KD helped to draft the introduction and the discussion section and assisted with final editing as well as with the revision of the introduction and the discussion; TL participated in the study’s design, consulted on the analysis, reviewed the results for accuracy, and assisted with final editing of both the original submission and the revision; CS conceived intervention trial from which data for the present study were drawn, participated in the present study’s design, reviewed the manuscript for accuracy, and assisted with final editing of both the original submission and the revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Arıcak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoğlu, A., Sarıbeyoğlu, S., Çıplak, S., Yılmaz, N., et al. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish Adolescents. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0016.
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bauer, D. J., & Sterba, S. K. (2011). Fitting multilevel models with ordinal outcomes: Performance of alternative specifications and methods of estimation. Psychological Methods, doi: 10.1037/a0025813.
  4. Bauman, S. (2010). Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: An exploratory study. Journal of Early Adolescence, doi: 10.1177/0272431609350927.
  5. Beale, A. V., & Hall, K. R. (2007). Cyberbullying: What school administrators (and parents) can do. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81(1), 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boulton, M. J., Bucci, E., & Hawker, D. D. S. (1999). Swedish and English secondary school pupils’ attitudes towards, and conceptions of, bullying: Concurrent links with bully/victim involvement. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.404127.
  7. Campbell, M. A. (2005). Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, doi: 10.1375/ajgc.15.1.68.
  8. Card, N. A., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2008). Peer victimization among schoolchildren: Correlations, causes, consequences, and considerations in assessment and intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, doi: 10.1037/a0012769.
  9. Chinn, S. (2000). A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20001130)19:22<3127::AID-SIM784>3.0.CO;2-M.
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Couvillon, M. A., & Ilieva, V. (2011). Recommended best practices: A review of school-wide preventative programs and strategies on cyberbullying. Preventing School Failure, doi: 10.1080/1045988X.2011.539461.
  12. Crick, N. R. & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.ep9506152720.
  13. David-Feron, C. & Feldman, M. H. (2007). Electronic media, violence, and adolescents: An emerging public health problem. Journal of Adolescent Health, doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.020.
  14. Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.755.
  15. Dooley, J. J., Pyżalski, P., & Cross, D. (2009). Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: A theoretical and conceptual review. Journal of Psychology, doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.182.
  16. Eliot, M., Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2010). Supportive school climate and student willingness to seek help for bullying and threats of violence. Journal of School Psychology, doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2010.07.001.
  17. Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis (Methodology in the Social Sciences). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.
  19. Erdur-Baker, O. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, doi: 10.1177/1461444809341260.
  20. Gebregziabher, M., & DeSantis, S. M. (2010). Latent class based multiple imputation approach for missing categorical data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.04.020.
  21. Gini, G. (2006). Bullying as a social process: The role of group membership in students’ perception of inter-group aggression at school. Journal of School Psychology, doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2005.12.002.
  22. Hartung, C. M., Little, C. S., Allen, E. K., & Page, M. C. (2011). A psychometric comparison of two self-report measures of bullying and victimization: Differences by gender and grade. School Mental Health, doi: 10.1007/s12310-010-9046-1.
  23. Hawker, D., & Boulton, M. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00629.
  24. Hemphill, S. A., Kotevski, A., Tollit, M., Smith, R., Herrenkohl, T. I., Toumbourou, J.W., et al. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of cyber and traditional bullying perpetration in Australian secondary school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.11.019.
  25. Henry, D. B., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., Tolan, P., VanAcker, R., & Eron, L. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, doi: 10.1023/A:1005142429725.
  26. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, doi: 10.1080/01639620701457816.
  27. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Hirschstein, M. K., Van Schoiack Edstrom, L., Frey, K. S., Snell, J. L., & MacKenzie, E. P. (2007). Walking the talk in bullying prevention: Teacher implementation variables related to initial impact of the steps to respect program. School Psychology Review, 36(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
  29. Juvonen, J. & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x.
  30. Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T.D., Alanen, E., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). Effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 1–3 and 7–9. Journal of Educational Psychology, doi: 10.1037/a0030417.
  31. Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Alanen, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2011a). Going to scale: A nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for Grades 1–9. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025740.
  32. Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011b). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4–6. Child Development, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x.
  33. Kiriakidis, S. P., & Kavoura, A. (2010). Cyberbullying: A review of the literature on harassment through the internet and other electronic means. Family & Community Health, doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e3181d593e4.
  34. Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017.
  35. Kyriakides, L., Kaloyirou, C. & Lindsay, G. (2006). An analysis of the Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire using the Rasch measurement model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, doi: 10.1348/000709905X53499.
  36. Law, D. M., Shapka, J. D., Hymel, S., Olson, B. F., & Waterhouse, T. (2011). The changing face of bullying: An empirical comparison between traditional and internet bullying and victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.004.
  37. Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, doi: 10.1177/0143034306064547.
  38. Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Calussi, P. (2011). The measurement of cyberbullying: Dimensional structure and relative item severity and discrimination. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0002.
  39. Mishna, F., Saini, M., & Solomon, S. (2009). Ongoing and online: Children and youth’s perceptions of cyber bullying. Children and Youth Services Review, doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.05.004.
  40. Muthén, L. K. and Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide. Seventh Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  41. Newgent, R. A., Lounsbery, K. L., Keller, E. A., Baker, C. R., Cavell, T. A., & Boughfman, E. M. (2009). Differential perceptions of bullying in the schools: A comparison of student, parent, teacher, school counselor, and principal reports. Journal of School Counseling, 7(38), 1–33.Google Scholar
  42. O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, doi: 10.1006/j.jado.1999.0238.
  43. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Olweus, D. (1996). The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. University of Bergen, Research Center for Health Promotion.Google Scholar
  45. Ortega, R., & Mora-Merchán, J. A. (1999). Spain. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 157–173). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Osborne, J. W. (2006). Bringing balance and technical accuracy to reporting odds ratios and the results of logistic regression analyses. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, doi: 10.4135/9781412995627.
  47. Patchin, J. W. & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, doi: 10.1177/1541204006286288.
  48. Raskauskas, J., & Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564.
  49. Reynolds, W. M. (2003). Reynolds’ bully-victimization scales for schools. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  50. Rigby, K. (2004). Addressing bullying in schools: Theoretical perspectives and their implications. School Psychology, doi: 10.1177/0143034304046902.
  51. Rigby, K. (2005). Why do some children bully at school? The contributions of negative attitudes towards victims and the perceived expectations of friends, parents, and teachers. School Psychology International, doi: 10.1177/0143034305052910.
  52. Rigby, K., & Slee, P. (1991). Bullying among Australian school children: Reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. Journal of Social Psychology, doi: 10.1080/00224545.1991.9924646.
  53. Rodkin, P. C., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2003). Bullies and victims in the peer ecology: Four questions for psychologists and school professionals. School Psychology Review, 32(3), 384–400.Google Scholar
  54. Salmivalli, C. (2001). Group view on victimization: Empirical findings and their implications. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in schools: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 318–419). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  55. Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2010). From peer putdowns to peer support: A theoretical model and how it translated into a national antibullying program. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 441–454). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Voeten, M. (2005). Anti-bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, doi: 10.1348/000709905X26011.
  57. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T.
  58. Salmivalli, C., Lappalainen, M., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1998). Stability and change of behavior in connection with bullying in schools: A two-year follow-up. Aggressive Behavior, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1998)24:3<205::AID-AB5>3.0.CO;2-J.
  59. Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, doi: 10.1080/01650250344000488.
  60. Scholte, R., Sentse, M., & Granic, I. (2010). Do actions speak louder than words? Classroom attitudes and behavior to bullying in early adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, doi: 10.1080/15374416.2010.517161.
  61. Shariff, S., & Hoff, D. L. (2007). Cyber bullying: Clarifying legal boundaries for school supervision in cyberspace. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 1(1), 76–118.Google Scholar
  62. Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2007). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x.
  63. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x.
  64. Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, doi: 10.1002/ab.10047.
  66. Sourander, A., Klomek, A. B., Ikonen, M., Lindroos, J., Luntamo, T., Koskelainen, M., et al. (2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79.
  67. Stevens, V., Van Oost, P., & De Bourdeaudhuji, I. D. (2000). The effects of an anti-bullying intervention programme on peers’ attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Adolescence, doi: 10.1006/jado.1999.0296.
  68. Sutton, J. & Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:2<97::AID-AB3>3.0.CO;2-7.
  69. Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review a synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014.
  70. van Goethem, A. A. J., Scholte, R. H., & Wiers, R. W. (2010). Explicit- and implicit bullying attitudes in relation to bullying behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, doi: 10.1007/s10802-010-9405-2.
  71. Wade, A., & Beran, T. (2011). Cyberbullying: The new era of bullying. The Canadian Journal of School Psychology, doi: 10.1177/0829573510396318.
  72. Williams, K. R. & Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.018.
  73. Williford, A., Boulton, A., Noland, B., Kärnä, A., Little, T. D., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). Effects of the KiVa antibullying program on adolescents’ perception of peers, depression, and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9551-1.
  74. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Youth engaging in online harassment: Associations with caregiver-child relationships, internet use, and personal characteristics. Journal of Adolescence, doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.007.
  75. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2007). Prevalence and frequency of internet harassment instigation: Implications for adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.03.005.
  76. Ybarra, M.L., Mitchell, K.J., Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2006). Examining characteristics and associated distress related to internet harassment: Findings from the second youth internet safety survey. Pediatrics, doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0815.
  77. Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 21–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Christian Elledge
    • 1
  • Anne Williford
    • 2
  • Aaron J. Boulton
    • 3
  • Kathryn J. DePaolis
    • 2
  • Todd D. Little
    • 3
  • Christina Salmivalli
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Child Psychology, 2010 Dole Human Development CenterUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.School of Social WelfareUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  3. 3.Department of Quantitative PsychologyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  4. 4.Division of Psychology, Department of Behavioural Sciences and PhilosophyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations