Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 42, Issue 7, pp 1041–1052

More Than Just Fun and Games: The Longitudinal Relationships Between Strategic Video Games, Self-Reported Problem Solving Skills, and Academic Grades

Empirical Research


Some researchers have proposed that video games possess good learning principles and may promote problem solving skills. Empirical research regarding this relationship, however, is limited. The goal of the presented study was to examine whether strategic video game play (i.e., role playing and strategy games) predicted self-reported problem solving skills among a sample of 1,492 adolescents (50.8 % female), over the four high school years. The results showed that more strategic video game play predicted higher self-reported problem solving skills over time than less strategic video game play. In addition, the results showed support for an indirect association between strategic video game play and academic grades, in that strategic video game play predicted higher self-reported problem solving skills, and, in turn, higher self-reported problem solving skills predicted higher academic grades. The novel findings that strategic video games promote self-reported problem solving skills and indirectly predict academic grades are important considering that millions of adolescents play video games every day.


Problem solving Academic performance Video games Adolescent development 


  1. Adachi, P. J. C., & Willoughby, T. (2012). Do video games promote positive youth development? Journal of Adolescent Research. doi:10.1177/0743558412464522.
  2. Anderson, C. A., & Dill, K. E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 772–790. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.772.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. A., Ihori, N., Bushman, B. J., Rothsetin, H. R., Shibuya, A., Swing, E. L., et al. (2010). Video Game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior and eastern and western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 151–173. doi:10.1037/a0018251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arbuckle, J. L. (1995–2010). AMOS 19 User’s Guide. Crawford, FL: AMOS Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, K., Berch, D. B., Helmers, K. F., Jobe, J. B., Leveck, M. D., Marsiske, M., et al. (2002). Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: A randomized control trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 2271–2281. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.156591.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basak, C., Boot, W. R., Voss, M., & Kramer, A. F. (2008). Can training in a real-time strategy video game attenuate cognitive decline in older adults? Psychology and Aging, 23, 765–777. doi:10.1037/a0013494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biscotti, F., Blau, B., Lovelock, J-D., Nguyen, T. H., Erensen, J., Verma, S., Liu, V. (2011). Market trends: Gaming ecosystem, 2011. Retrieved from Gartner Newsroom:
  8. Blumberg, F. C., Rosenthal, S. F., & Randall, J. D. (2008). Impasse-driven learning in the context of video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1530–1541. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boot, W. R., Blakely, D. P., & Simons, D. J. (2011). Do action video games improve perception and cognition? Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ciarrochi, J., Leeson, P., & Heaven, P. C. L. (2009). A longitudinal study into the interplay between self-reported problem orientation and adolescent well-being. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 56, 441–449. doi:10.1037/a0015765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. D’Zurilla, T. J., & Sheedy, C. F. (1992). The relation between social problem-solving ability and subsequent level of academic competence in college students 1. Therapy, 16(5). doi:10.1007/BF01175144.
  12. Feldman, B. J., Masyn, K. E., & Conger, R. D. (2009). New approaches to studying problem behaviors: A comparison of methods for modeling longitudinal, categorical adolescent drinking data. Developmental Psychology, 45, 652–676. doi:10.1037/a0014851.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferguson, C. J. (2011). The influence of television and video game use on attention and school problems: A multivariate analysis with other risk factors controlled. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45, 808–813. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.11.010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferguson, C. J., & Garza, A. (2011). Call of (civic) duty: Action games and civic behavior in a large sample of youth. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 770–775. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferguson, C. J., & Kilburn, J. (2010). Much ado about nothing: The misestimation and overinterpretation of violent video game effects in eastern and western nations: Comment on Anderson et al. (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 136, 174–178. doi:10.1037/a0018566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gee, J. P. (2005). Good video games and good learning. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 85, 33–37.Google Scholar
  17. Gee, J. P. (2008). Good videogames, the human mind, and good learning. In T. Willoughby & E. Wood (Eds.), Children’s learning in a digital world (pp. 40–63). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Gentile, D. (2009). Pathological video-game use among youth ages 8 to 18. Psychological Science,. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02340.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gentile, D. A., Anderson, C. A., Yukawa, S., Ihori, N., Saleem, M., Ming, L. K., et al. (2009). The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors International evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 752–763. doi:10.1177/0146167209333045.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534–537. doi:10.1038/nature01647.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2006). Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: The case of action video game players. Cognition, 101, 217–245. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2008). Exercising your brain: A review of human brain plasticity and training-induced learning. Psychology and Aging, 23, 692–701. doi:10.1037/a0014345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greitemeyer, T., & Osswald, S. (2010). Effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 211–221. doi:10.1037/a0016997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hyde, J. S., & Petersen, J. L. (2009). A longitudinal investigation of peer sexual harassment victimization in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 1178–1188. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.01.011.Google Scholar
  25. Kinney, L. (1952). Developing problem-solving skills in adolescents. The High School Journal, 35, 113–119.Google Scholar
  26. Kuhn, D. (2009). Adolescent thinking. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent development third edition (Vol. 1, pp. 152–186). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Kuhn, D., & Pease, M. (2006). Do children and adults learn differently? Journal of Cognition and Development, 7, 279–293. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0703_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183. doi:10.1037//0003.Google Scholar
  29. Lenhart, A., Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., Macgill, A. R., Evans, C., & Vitak, J. (2008). Teens, video games, and civics. (Report No. 202-415-4500). Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  30. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Skoric, M. M., Teo, L. C. T., & Neo, R. L. (2009). Children and video games: Addiction, engagement, and scholastic achievement. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 12(5), 567–572. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0079.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Squire, K. D. (2007). Games, learning, and society: Building a field. Society, (October), 51–54.Google Scholar
  35. Statistics Canada (2001). Population by ethnic origin [on-line]. Available: Scholar
  36. Steinkuehler, C., & Duncan, S. (2008). Scientific habits of mind in virtual worlds. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 530–543. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9120-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ventura, M., Shute, V. J., & Zhao, W. (2013). The relationship between video game use and a performance-based measure of persistence. Computers & Education, 60, 52–58. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weis, R., & Cerankosky, B. C. (2010). Effects of video-game ownership on young boys’ academic and behavioral functioning: A randomized, controlled study. Psychological Science, 21, 463–470. doi:10.1177/0956797610362670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Willoughby, T. (2008). A short-term longitudinal study of Internet and computer game use by adolescent boys and girls: Prevalence, frequency of use, and psychosocial predictors. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 195–204. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Willoughby, T., Adachi, P. J. C., & Good, M. (2011). A longitudinal study of the association between violent video game play and aggression among adolescents. Developmental Psychology,. doi:10.1037/a0026046.Google Scholar
  41. Wills, T. A., McNamara, G., Vaccaro, D., & Hirky, A. E. (1996). Escalated substance use: A longitudinal grouping analysis from early to middle childhood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 166–180. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.105.2.166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206. doi:10.1086/651257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations