Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 43, Issue 8, pp 1306–1321 | Cite as

Correlates of Cyber Dating Abuse Among Teens

  • Janine M. ZweigEmail author
  • Pamela Lachman
  • Jennifer Yahner
  • Meredith Dank
Empirical Research


Recent advancements in technology (e.g., social networking, texting) have created new ways for dating youth to relate to one another, including in abusive ways via “cyber dating abuse.” Cyber dating abuse is a form of teen dating violence that overlaps with other types of abuse (e.g., psychological) but also has several unique characteristics. Given the phenomenon’s limited presence in dating violence literature, we focus on identifying how experiencing cyber dating abuse relates to youths’ individual behaviors and experiences (e.g., substance use, sexual activity), psychosocial adjustment, school connection, family relationships, and partner relationships. A total of 3,745 youth (52 % female, 74 % White) in three northeastern states participated in the survey and reported currently being in a dating relationship or having been in one during the prior year. We found that experiences of cyber dating abuse were most significantly correlated with being female, committing a greater variety of delinquent behaviors, having had sexual activity in one’s lifetime, having higher levels of depressive symptoms, and having higher levels of anger/hostility. Further, cyber dating abuse appeared somewhat more strongly related to depressive symptoms and delinquency than did other forms of teen dating violence and abuse.


Teen dating violence Cyber dating abuse Victimization 



This project was supported by Award No. 2010-WG-BX-003, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions and recommendations expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice, or of the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Elements of this paper were reported to the National Institute of Justice in the form of a final technical report as per grant obligations. The authors would like to thank: (1) the administrators, faculty, and staff of schools who assisted us in collecting the data documented in this report, (2) CJ Pascoe of Colorado College and Cindy Southworth, Erica Olsen, and Sarah Tucker of the National Network to End Domestic Violence for their input on survey measures, and (3) the National Institute of Justice and Dr. Nancy La Vigne, Director of the Urban Institute’s Justice Policy Center, for their careful review of project findings.

Author Contributions

JZ and MD conceived of the larger study, directed and participated in its design and coordination, and assisted in writing of the manuscript; PL participated in the study’s design and coordination, performed most statistical analyses, and assisted in writing of the manuscript; JY assisted in the study’s design and interpretation of the data, performed some statistical analyses, and assisted in writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


  1. Ackard, D. M., Neumark-Sztainer, D., & Hannan, P. (2003). Dating violence among a nationally representative sample of adolescent girls and boys: Associations with behavioral and mental health. Journal of Gender Specific Medicine, 6(3), 39–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, P. (2001). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Arriaga, X. B., & Foshee, V. A. (2004). Adolescent dating violence: Do adolescent follow in their friends’, or their parents’, footsteps? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 162–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of human developmental processes. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), The handbook of child psychology (3rd ed., pp. 993–1027). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Statistics Canada. (2000). 1999 General Social Survey on Victimization. Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, W. A. (2003). More than myth: The developmental significance of romantic relationships during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Communities that Care. (2006). See
  9. Cutbush, S., Ashley, O. S., Kan., M. L., Hampton, J., and Hall, D. M. (2010). Electronic aggression among adolescent dating partners: Demographic correlates and associations with other types of violence. Poster presented at the American Public Health Association, annual meeting, November 6–10, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  10. Cutbush, S., Williams, J., Miller, S., Gibbs, D., & Clinton-Sherrod, M. (2012). Electronic dating aggression among middle school students: Demographic correlates and associations with other types of violence. Poster presented at the American Public Health Association, annual meeting, October 27–31, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Draucker, C. B., & Martsolf, D. S. (2010). The role of electronic communication technology in adolescent dating violence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 23(3), 133–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eaton, D. K., Davis, K. S., Barrios, L., Brener, N. D., & Noonan, R. K. (2007). Associations of dating violence victimization with lifetime participation, co-occurrence, and early initiation of risk behaviors among U.S. high school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 585–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fergusson, D. M., Boden, J. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2008). Developmental antecedents of interpartner violence in a New Zealand birth cohort. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 737–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foshee, V. A. (1996). Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types and injuries. Health Education Research, Theory and Practice, 11(3), 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foshee, V. A., Benefield, T., Ennett, S., Bauman, K. E., & Suchindran, C. (2004). Longitudinal predictors of serious physical and sexual dating violence victimization during adolescence. Preventive Medicine, 39, 1007–1016.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Furman, W. (2002). The emerging field of adolescent romantic relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 177–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Griezel, L. (2007). Out of the schoolyard and into cyber space: Elucidating the nature and psychosocial consequences of traditional and cyber bullying for Australian Secondary Students. Unpublished honours thesis, University of Western Sydney, Sydney.Google Scholar
  18. Halpern, C. T., Oslak, S. G., Young, M. L., Martin, S. L., & Kupper, L. L. (2001). Partner violence among adolescents in opposite-sex romantic relationships: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. American Journal of Public Health, 91(10), 1679–1685.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howard, D., Qiu, Y., & Boekeloo, B. (2003). Personal and social contextual correlates of adolescent dating violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33(1), 9–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howard, D. E., Wang, M. Q., & Fang, Y. (2007). Psychosocial factors associated with reports of physical dating violence victimization among U.S. adolescent females. Adolescence, 42(166), 311–324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Howard, D. E., Wang, M. Q., & Fang, Y. (2008). Psychosocial factors associated with reports of physical dating violence victimization among U.S. adolescent males. Adolescence, 43(171), 449–460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lenhart, A. (2012). Teens, smartphones, and texting. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  23. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickurh, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  24. Maruish, M. E. (2004). The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Instruments for adults (Vol. 3). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Michigan Department of Community Health. (1997). Survey of violence against women in Michigan. Poster presented at: American Public Health Association annual meeting.Google Scholar
  26. Mulford, C., & Giordano, P. M. (2008). Teen dating violence: A closer look at adolescent romantic relationships. National Institute of Justice Journal, 261, 34–40.Google Scholar
  27. Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Picard, P. (2007). Tech abuse in teen relationships. Chicago, IL: Teen Research Unlimited. Accessed 3/24/11.
  29. RTI International. (2012). Prevention in middle school matters: A summary of findings on teen dating violence behaviors and associated risk factors among 7th-grade students. Research Triangle, NC: RTI International.Google Scholar
  30. Strategic Advantage, Inc. (1998). Symptom Assessment-45 Questionnaire (SA-45) technical manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  31. Vezina, J., & Hebert, M. (2007). Risk factors for victimization in romantic relationships of young women: A review of empirical studies and implications for prevention. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 8(1), 33–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zweig, J. M., Barber, B. L., & Eccles, J. S. (1997). Sexual coercion and well-being in young adulthood: Comparisons by gender and college status. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(2), 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zweig, J. M., Dank, M., Yahner, J., & Lachman, P. (2013). The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(7), 1063–1077. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9922-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zweig, J. M., Sayer, A., Crockett, L. J., & Vicary, J. R. (2002). Adolescent risk factors for sexual victimization: A longitudinal analysis of rural women. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17(6), 586–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janine M. Zweig
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pamela Lachman
    • 1
  • Jennifer Yahner
    • 1
  • Meredith Dank
    • 1
  1. 1.Justice Policy CenterUrban InstituteWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations