Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 711–722 | Cite as

Social Influences on Cyberbullying Behaviors Among Middle and High School Students

  • Sameer HindujaEmail author
  • Justin W. Patchin
Empirical Research

Abstract

Cyberbullying is a problem affecting a meaningful proportion of youth as they embrace online communication and interaction. Research has identified a number of real-world negative ramifications for both the targets and those who bully. During adolescence, many behavioral choices are influenced and conditioned by the role of major socializing agents, including friends, family, and adults at school. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which peers, parents, and educators influence the cyberbullying behaviors of adolescents. To explore this question, data were analyzed from a random sample of approximately 4,400 sixth through twelfth grade students (49 % female; 63 % nonwhite) from thirty-three schools in one large school district in the southern United States. Results indicate that cyberbullying offending is associated with perceptions of peers behaving similarly, and the likelihood of sanction by adults. Specifically, youth who believed that many of their friends were involved in bullying and cyberbullying were themselves more likely to report cyberbullying behaviors. At the same time, respondents who believed that the adults in their life would punish them for cyberbullying were less likely to participate. Implications for schools and families are discussed with the goal of mitigating this behavior and its negative outcomes among adolescent populations.

Keywords

Cyberbullying Bullying Peers Adolescence Youth Technology Cyberspace 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

S.H. and J.P. both conceived of the study, participated in its design and execution, and drafted the manuscript equally. They both read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44, 636–655.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Akers, R. L., & Lee, G. (1996). A longitudinal test of social learning theory: Adolescent smoking. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(2), 317–343.Google Scholar
  4. Aseltine, R. H., Gore, S., & Gordon, J. (2000). Life stress, anger and anxiety, and delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(3), 256–275. doi: 10.2307/2676320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Communications and Media Authority. (2010). Cybersmart parents: Connecting parents to cybersafety resources. Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_311301.
  6. Battistich, V., Schaps, E., & Wilson, N. (2004). Effects of an elementary school intervention on students’ “connectedness” to school and social adjustment during middle school. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 24(3), 243–262.Google Scholar
  7. Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Kim, D.-I., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1995). Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students’ attitudes, motives, and performance: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 627–658.Google Scholar
  8. Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1997). Caring school communities. Educational Psychologist, 32(3), 137–151.Google Scholar
  9. Black, S. (2007). Evaluation of the Olweus Bullying prevention program: How the program can work for inner city youth. Paper presented at the persistently safe schools: The 2007 national conference on safe schools, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Boulton, M. (2005). School peer counselling for bullying services as a source of social support: A study with secondary school pupils. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 33(4), 485–494.Google Scholar
  11. Boyd, D. (2006). Identity production in a networked culture: Why youth heart myspace. Paper presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, February 19, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. Broidy, L. M., & Agnew, R. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(3), 275–306. doi: 10.1177/0022427897034003001.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, B. B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 363–394). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, B. B., Bakken, J. P., Ameringer, S. W., & Mahon, M. D. (2008). A comprehensive conceptualization of the peer influence process in adolescence. In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. Duke series in child development and public policy. New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  15. Calvert, S. L. (2002). Identity construction on the internet. In S. L. Calvert, A. B. Jordan, & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), Children in the digital age: Influences of electronic media on development (pp. 57–70). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  16. Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Newcomb, M. D., & Abbott, R. D. (1996). Modeling the etiology of adolescent substance abuse: A test for the social development model. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(2), 429–455.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Catalano, R. F., Oxford, M. L., Harachi, T. W., Abbott, R. D., & Haggerty, K. P. (1999). A test of the social development model to predict problem behavior during the elementary school period. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 9(1), 39–56.Google Scholar
  18. Cernkovich, S. A., & Giordano, P. C. (1992). School bonding, race, and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 261–291.Google Scholar
  19. Cloward, R. A., & Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cowie, H. (1999). Peers helping peers: Interventions, initiatives and insights. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 433–436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. De Kemp, R. A., Scholte, R. H., Overbeek, G., & Engels, R. C. (2006). Early adolescent delinquency: The role of parents and best friends. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 488–510.Google Scholar
  23. Deptula, D. P., & Cohen, R. (2004). Aggressive, rejected, and delinquent children and adolescents: A comparison of their friendships. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 75–104.Google Scholar
  24. Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. (1991). Family, school, and behavioral antecendents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology, 27, 172–180.Google Scholar
  25. Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescents friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390.Google Scholar
  26. Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 701–778). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Elliott, D. S., & Menard, S. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: Temporal and developmental patterns. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime (pp. 28–67). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ericson, N. (2001). Addressing the problem of juvenile bullying OJJDP Fact Sheet, 27. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  30. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  31. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  32. Fergusson, D. M., Woodward, L. J., & Horwood, L. (1999). Childhood peer relationship problems and young people’s involvement with deviant peers in adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 357–369.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Wolak, J. (2000). Online victimization: A report on the Nation’s Youth. Retrieved June 30, 2000, from http://www.ncmec.org/en_US/publications/NC62.pdf.
  34. Germán, M., Gonzales, N. A., & Dumka, L. E. (2009). Familism values as a protective factor for Mexican-origin adolescents exposed to deviant peers. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 16–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. T. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. New York: Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
  36. Grotevant, H. D. (1998). Adolescent development in family contexts. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1097–1149). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Grusec, J. E., Goodnow, J. J., & Cohen, L. (1996). Household work and the development of concern for others. Developmental Psychology, 32(6), 999–1007.Google Scholar
  38. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implication for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013–1057.Google Scholar
  40. Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Abbott, R. D., & Guo, J. (2005). Family influences on the risk of daily smoking initiation. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 202–210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2007). Offline consequences of online victimization: School violence and delinquency. Journal of School Violence, 6(3), 89–112. doi: 10.1300/J202v06n03_06.Google Scholar
  42. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 1–29. doi: 10.1080/01639620701457816.Google Scholar
  43. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010a). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206–221. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2010.494133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010b). Cyberbullying: A review of the legal issues facing educators. Preventing School Failure, 55(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  46. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2012). School climate 2.0: Reducing teen technology misuse by reshaping the environment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  48. Horvath, F. (1982). Forgotten unemployment: Recall bias in retrospective data. Monthly Labor Review, 105(3), 40–43.Google Scholar
  49. Jang, S. J., & Thornberry, T. P. (1998). Self-esteem, delinquent peers, and delinquency: A test of the self-enhancement thesis. American Sociological Review, 63, 586–598.Google Scholar
  50. Jussim, L., & Osgood, D. W. (1989). Influence and similarity among friends: An integrated model applied to incarcerated adolescents. Social Psychological Quarterly, 52, 98–112.Google Scholar
  51. Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds?—bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78, 496–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436.Google Scholar
  53. Kaplan, H. B. (1980). Deviant behavior in defense of self. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  54. Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 366–380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S22–S30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Laird, R. D., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2003). Parent’s monitoring-relevant knowledge and adolescents’ delinquent behavior: Evidence of correlated developmental changes and reciprocal influences. Child Development, 73, 752–768.Google Scholar
  57. Laird, R. D., Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (1999). Best friendships, group relationships, and antisocial behavior in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 413–437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Laird, R. D., Pettit, G. S., Mize, J., Brown, E. G., & Lindsey, E. (1994). Mother–child conversations about peers: Contributions to competence. Family Relations, 43, 425–432.Google Scholar
  59. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Teens-and-social-media/Summary/Findings.aspx.
  60. Mahdavi, J., & Smith, P. K. (2002). The operation of a bully court and perceptions of its success: A case study. School Psychology International, 23, 327–341.Google Scholar
  61. Matsueda, R. L. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association: A causal modeling approach. American Sociological Review, 47, 489–504.Google Scholar
  62. Matsueda, R. L., & Anderson, K. (1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology, 36, 269–308.Google Scholar
  63. Matsueda, R. L., & Heimer, K. (1987). Race, family structure, and delinquency: A test of differential association and social control. American Sociological Review, 52, 826–846.Google Scholar
  64. Mazerolle, P., Burton, V., Cullen, F. T., Evans, D., & Payne, G. L. (2000). Strain, anger, and delinquent adaptations: Specifying general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 89–101. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2352(99)00041-0.Google Scholar
  65. Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Linking exposure to strain with anger: An investigation of deviant adaptations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(3), 195–211. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2352(97)00085-8.Google Scholar
  66. Miller, K. S., Forehand, R., & Kotchik, B. A. (2000). Adolescent sexual behavior in two ethnic minority samples: A multi-system perspective. Adolescence, 35, 313–333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Mishna, F., Cook, C., Saini, M., Wu, M. J., & MacFadden, R. (2009). Interventions for children, youth, and parents to prevent and reduce cyber abuse. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2, 1–54.Google Scholar
  68. Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (1998). Annotation: Implications of violence between intimate partners for child psychologists and psychiatrists. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 137–144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Morgenstern, R., & Barrett, N. (1974). The retrospective bias in unemployment reporting by sex, race and age. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 355–357.Google Scholar
  70. Nagin, D. (1998). The empirical status of deterrence theory: A meta-analysis. Crime and Justice, 23(1), 1–42.Google Scholar
  71. O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Oliner, P. M., & Oliner, S. P. (1995). Toward a caring society: Ideas into action. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  73. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2011). Traditional and nontraditional bullying among youth: A test of general strain theory. Youth and Society, 43(2), 727–751. doi: 10.1177/0044118X10366951.Google Scholar
  74. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2012). Cyberbullying: An update and synthesis of the research. In J. Patchin & S. Hinduja (Eds.), Cyberbullying prevention and response: Expert perspectives (pp. 13–35). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Paternoster, R. (1987). The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly, 4(2), 173–218.Google Scholar
  76. Patterson, G. R., & Dishion, T. J. (1985). Contributions of families and peers to delinquency. Criminology, 23, 63–77.Google Scholar
  77. Payne, A. A. (2008). A multilevel analysis of the relationships among communal school organization, student bonding, and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(4), 429–455.Google Scholar
  78. Payne, D., & Cornwell, B. (2007). Modeling peer influences on delinquency: Beyond the direct contact hypothesis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 127–150.Google Scholar
  79. Pepler, D., Craig, W., Ziegler, S., & Charach, A. (Eds.). (1993). A school-based anti-bullying intervention: Preliminary evaluation. Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  80. Perkins, D. F. (2000). Community youth development: A partnership for action. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agriculture and Extension Education.Google Scholar
  81. Pratt, T. C., Cullen, F. T., Blevins, K. R., Daigle, L. E., & Madensen, T. D. (2006). The empirical status of deterrence theory: A meta-analysis. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory—Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 15, pp. 367–395). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  82. Resnick, M. D., Harris, L. J., & Blum, R. W. (1993). The impact of caring and connectedness on adolescent health and well-being. Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health, 29(Suppl), s1–s9.Google Scholar
  83. Rigby, K. (2003). Consequences of bullying in schools. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 583–590.Google Scholar
  84. Rigby, K. (2008). Children and bullying. How parents and educators can reduce bullying at school. Boston, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  85. Rodgers, K. B. (1999). Parenting processes related to sexual risk-taking behaviors of adolescent males and females. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 99–109.Google Scholar
  86. Rothbaum, F., & Weisz, J. (1994). Parental converging and child externalizing behavior in non-clinical samples: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 55–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 453–459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and victimization: Prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem and depression. Adolescence, 38, 735–747.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Simons, R. L., Simons, L. G., Burt, C. H., Brody, G. H., & Cutrona, C. (2005). Collective efficacy, authoritative parenting and delinquency: A longitudinal test of a model integrating community- and family-level processes. Criminology, 43, 989–1029. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2005.00031.x.Google Scholar
  91. Simons, R. L., Simons, L. G., Chen, Y.-F., Brody, G. H., & Lin, K.-H. (2007). Identifying the psychological factors that mediate the association between parenting practices and delinquency. Criminology, 45, 481–518.Google Scholar
  92. Simons, R. L., Simons, L. G., & Wallace, L. E. (2004). Families, delinquency, and crime: Linking society’s most basic institution to antisocial behavior. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  93. Slee, P. T., & Rigby, K. (1993). The relationship of Eysenck’s personality factors and self esteem to bully/victim behaviour in Australian school boys. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 371–373.Google Scholar
  94. Smith, P. K. (2004). Bullying: Recent developments. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 9(3), 98–103.Google Scholar
  95. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Steinberg, L. (2001). We know some things: Parent-adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  97. Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1531–1543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Sutherland, E. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Chicago: J.B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
  99. Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., & Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32, 47–83.Google Scholar
  100. Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277–287.Google Scholar
  101. Torney-Purta, J. (2002). The school’s role in developing civic engagement: A study of adolescents in twenty-eight countries. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 203–212.Google Scholar
  102. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  103. Warr, M. (1993). Parents, peers, and delinquency. Social Forces, 72, 247–264.Google Scholar
  104. Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Warr, M., & Stafford, M. (1991). Influence of delinquent peers: What they think or what they do? Criminology, 29, 851–866.Google Scholar
  106. Ybarra, M. L., Diener-West, M., & Leaf, P. J. (2007). Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S42–S50. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, J. K. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1308–1316. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2007). Prevalence and frequency of internet harassment instigation: Implications for adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.03.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida Atlantic UniversityJupiterUSA
  2. 2.University of Wisconsin-Eau ClaireEau ClaireUSA

Personalised recommendations