Personality Traits, Interpersonal Identity, and Relationship Stability: Longitudinal Linkages in Late Adolescence and Young Adulthood
- 1.8k Downloads
Adolescence and young adulthood are characterized by important changes in personality, changes toward a more stable identity, and the establishment of intimate relationships. We examined the role of personality traits in establishing intimate relationships, the interplay between personality traits and interpersonal identity processes during these relationships, and the role of interpersonal identity processes and personality traits in the dissolution thereof. For this purpose, we used longitudinal data on 424 female college students (mean age at T1 = 18.6 years; Sample 1) and 390 late adolescents drawn from a community sample (56.7 % female; mean age at T1 = 19.7 years; Sample 2). Especially highly extraverted individuals were likely to become involved in a relationship. Neuroticism was associated negatively, and Agreeableness and Conscientiousness were associated positively with a stronger sense of interpersonal identity within intimate relationships. Finally, the importance of interpersonal identity processes was underscored by the fact that these processes, and not so much personality traits, predicted relational breakups. Overall, the present study provides important insights into the role of personality and identity in the initiation, maintenance, and dissolution of intimate relationships in late adolescence and young adulthood.
KeywordsPersonality Identity formation Relationships Big five Adolescence Longitudinal
TK conceived of the study, drafted the manuscript, and conducted the analyses; KL coordinated data collection of Sample 1 and helped in drafting the manuscript; SB participated in the design of the study from which Sample 2 data was drawn and helped in drafting the manuscript; ET helped in drafting the manuscript; LG designed the study from which the data for Sample 1 was drawn and helped drafting the manuscript; WM designed the study from which Sample 2 data was drawn and helped in drafting the manuscript.
- Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Bosma, H. A. (1985). Identity development in adolescence: Coping with commitments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. T., Jr, & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the five factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Hoekstra, H. A., Ormel, J., & De Fruyt, F. (1996). NEO persoonlijkheids vragenlijsten: NEO-PI-R, NEO-FFI. Handleiding [NEO personality questionnaires: NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI-Manual]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
- Klimstra, T. A., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Teppers, E., & De Fruyt, F. (in press). Associations of identity dimensions with Big Five personality domains and facets. European Journal of Personality. doi: 10.1002/per.1853.
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Meeus, W. H. J., Akse, J., Branje, S. J. T., Ter Bogt, T. F. M., Crommelin, P. M., Delsing, M. J. M. H., et al. (2006). Codebook of the research project CONflict And Management Of RElationships (CONAMORE). Unpublished manuscript, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Meeus, W. H. J., Branje, S. J. T., van der Valk, I., & de Wied, M. (2007). Relationships with intimate partner, best friend, and parents in adolescence and early adulthood: A study of the saliency of intimate partnership. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 569–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roberts, B. W., & Wood, D. (2006). Personality development in the context of the neo-Socioanalytic Model of personality. In D. Mroczek & T. Little (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 11–39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Vermulst, A. A., & Gerris, J. R. M. (2005). QBF: Quick Big Five persoonlijkheidstest handleiding [Quick Big Five personality test manual]. Leeuwarden, The Netherlands: LDC Publications.Google Scholar