Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 42, Issue 7, pp 994–1014 | Cite as

The Jingle–Jangle Fallacy in Adolescent Autonomy in the Family: In Search of an Underlying Structure

  • Stijn Van PetegemEmail author
  • Maarten Vansteenkiste
  • Wim Beyers
Empirical Research

Abstract

The construct of autonomy has a rich, though quite controversial, history in adolescent psychology. The present investigation aimed to clarify the meaning and measurement of adolescent autonomy in the family. Based on theory and previous research, we examined whether two dimensions would underlie a wide range of autonomy-related measures, using data from two adolescent samples (N = 707, 51 % girls, and N = 783, 59 % girls, age range = 14–21 years). Clear evidence was found for a two-dimensional structure, with the first dimension reflecting “volition versus pressure”, that is, the degree to which adolescents experience a sense of volition and choice as opposed to feelings of pressure and coercion in the parent–adolescent relationship. The second dimension reflected “distance versus proximity”, which involves the degree of interpersonal distance in the parent-adolescent relationship. Whereas volition related to higher well-being, less problem behavior and a secure attachment style, distance was associated mainly with more problem behavior and an avoidant attachment style. These associations were not moderated by age. The discussion focuses on the meaning of adolescent autonomy and on the broader implications of the current findings.

Keywords

Autonomy Independence Self-determination theory Distance Attachment Adolescence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Bart Soenens and Loes Keijsers for their useful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. SVP coordinated the project, conceived of the study, participated in the design, coordinated the data collection, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. MV and WB participated in the study design, helped in the collection and interpretation of the data and in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. This research was supported by Grant 3F009009 from the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., Bell, K. L., & O’Connor, T. G. (1994). Longitudinal assessment of autonomy and relatedness in adolescent family interactions as predictors of adolescent ego development and self-esteem. Child Development, 65, 179–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, J. P., & Land, D. (1999). Attachment in adolescence. In J. Casssidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications (pp. 319–335). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, J. P., McElhaney, K. B., Land, D. J., Kuperminc, G. P., Moore, C. W., O’Beirne-Kelly, H., et al. (2003). A secure base in adolescence: Markers of attachment security in the mother-adolescent relationship. Child Development, 74, 292–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, J. P., Philliber, S., Herrling, S., & Kuperminc, G. P. (1997). Preventing teen pregnancy and academic failure: Experimental evaluation of a developmentally based approach. Child Development, 68, 729–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T. (1983). Cognitive treatment of depression: New perspectives. In P. J. Clayton & J. E. Barrett (Eds.), Treatment of depression: Old controversies and new approaches (pp. 265–290). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  6. Becker-Stoll, F., Fremmer-Bombik, E., Wartner, U., Zimmerman, P., & Grossmann, K. E. (2008). Is attachment at ages 1, 6 and 16 related to autonomy and relatedness behavior of adolescents in interaction towards their mothers? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 372–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beckert, T. E. (2007). Cognitive autonomy and self evaluation in adolescence: A conceptual investigation and instrument development. North American Journal of Psychology, 9, 579–594.Google Scholar
  8. Beckert, T. E. (2012). Adolescent autonomy and its assessment. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 241–247). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Beyers, W., & Goossens, L. (1999). Emotional autonomy, psychosocial adjustment and parenting: Interactions, moderating and mediating effects. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 753–769.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beyers, W., & Goossens, L. (2003). Psychological separation and adjustment to university: Moderating effects of gender, age, and perceived parenting style. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beyers, W., Goossens, L., Vansant, I., & Moors, E. (2003). A structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: Connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blos, P. (1979). The adolescent passage. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  13. Boles, S. A. (1999). A model of parental representations, second individuation, and psychological adjustment in late adolescence. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 497–512.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equation modeling with latent variables. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation and anxiety. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment : An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rhodes (Eds.), Attachment and close relationships (pp. 46–76). London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Brenning, K., Soenens, B., Braet, C., & Bosmans, G. (2011a). The role of depressogenic personality and attachment in the intergenerational similarity of depressive symptoms: A study with early adolescents and their mothers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 284–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brenning, K., Soenens, B., Braet, C., & Bosmans, G. (2011b). An adaptation of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale-Revised for use with children and adolescents. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 28, 1048–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Collins, W. A., & Repinski, D. J. (1994). Relationships during adolescence: Continuity and change in interpersonal perspective. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Personal relationships during adolescence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Cooper, C. R., & Grotevant, H. D. (2011). Autonomy or connections? Identities as intergenerational projectsa. In C. R. Cooper (Ed.), Multiple worlds: Cultures, identities, and pathways to college. New Yor, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Daddis, C. (2011). Desire for increased autonomy and adolescents’ perceptions of peer autonomy: “Everyone else can; why can’t I?”. Child Development, 82, 1310–1326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Darling, N., Cumsille, P., & Martinez, M. L. (2008). Individual differences in adolescents’ beliefs about legitimacy of parental authority and their own obligation to obey. Child Development, 79, 1103–1118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Deci, E. L., La Guardia, J. G., Moller, A. C., Scheiner, M. J., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). On the benefits of giving as well as receiving autonomy support: Mutuality in close friendships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 313–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dishion, T. J., Nelson, S. E., & Bullock, B. M. (2004). Premature adolescent autonomy: Parent disengagement and deviant peer process in the amplification of problem behavior. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 515–530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dornbusch, S. M., Carlsmith, J. M., Bushwall, S. J., Ritter, P. L., Leiderman, H., Hastorf, A. H., et al. (1985). Single parents, extended households, and the control of adolescents. Child Development, 56, 326–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dwairy, M., Achoui, M., Abouserie, R., & Farah, A. (2006). Adolescent-family connectedness among Arabs: A second cross-regional research study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 248–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Feeney, B. C. (2007). The dependency paradox in close relationships: Accepting dependence promotes independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 268–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Finnegan, R. A., Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1998). Victimization by peers: Associations with children’s reports of mother-child interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1076–1086.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fitzsimons, G. J., & Lehmann, D. R. (2004). Reactance to recommendations: When unsolicited advice yields contrary responses. Marketing Science, 23, 82–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Freud, A. (1958). Adolescence. In A. Freud (Ed.), The writings of Anna Freud: Research at the Hampstead Child-Therapy Clinic and other papers (1956–1965) (Vol. 5, pp. 136–166). New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  39. Fuligni, A. J., & Eccles, J. S. (1993). Perceived parent-child relationships and early adolescents orientation toward peers. Developmental Psychology, 29, 622–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Garber, J., & Little, S. A. (2001). Emotional autonomy and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gavazzi, S. M., Sabatelli, R. M., & Reese-Weber, M. (1999). Measurement of financial, functional, and psychological connections in families: Conceptual development and empirical use of the Multigenerational Interconnectedness Scale. Psychological Reports, 84, 1361–1371.Google Scholar
  42. Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harter, S. (1988). Manual for the self-perception profile for adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver.Google Scholar
  44. Hoffman, J. A. (1984). Psychological separation of late adolescents from their parents. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 170–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hong, S. M., & Faedda, S. (1996). Refinement of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality measures be evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 332–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kagitçibasi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. New York, NY: World book.Google Scholar
  49. Kins, E., Beyers, W., Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2009). Patterns of home leaving and subjective well-being in emerging adulthood: The role of motivational processes and parental autonomy support. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1416–1429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kruse, J., & Walper, S. (2008). Types of individuation in relation to parents: Predictors and outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 390–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kuhn, E. S., & Laird, R. D. (2011). Individual differences in early adolescents’ beliefs in the legitimacy of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1353–1365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 367–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Laghi, F., D’Alessio, M., Pallini, S., & Baiocco, R. (2009). Attachment representations and time perspective in adolescence. Social Indicators Research, 90, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lalwani, A. K., & Shavitt, S. (2009). The “me” I claim to be: Cultural self-construal elicits self-presentational goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 88–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lamborn, S. D., & Groh, K. (2009). A four-part model of autonomy during emerging adulthood: Associations with adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lee, C. T., Beckert, T. E., & Goodrich, T. R. (2010). The relationship between individualistic, collectivistic, and transitional cultural value orientations and adolescents’ autonomy and identity status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 882–893.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Levine, J. B., Green, C. J., & Millon, T. (1986). The separation-individuation test of adolescence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 123–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Little, R. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lopez, F. G., Campbell, V. L., & Watkins, C. E. (1988). Family structure, psychological separation, and college adjustment: A canonical analysis and cross-validation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 402–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lorenzo-Seva, U., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (2006). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Beyers, W. (2006). Unpacking commitment and exploration: Preliminary validation of an integrative model of late adolescent identity formation. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 361–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Marsh, H. W. (1994). Sport motivation orientations: Beware of jingle–jangle fallacies. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 16, 365–380.Google Scholar
  65. Mayseless, O., Wiseman, H., & Hai, I. (1998). Adolescents’ relationships with father, mother, and same-gender friend. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13, 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Bond, M. H., Costa, P. T., & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007a). Reflections on security dynamics: Core constructs, psychological mechanisms, relational contexts, and the need for an integrative theory. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007b). Attachment in adulthood: structure, dynamics and change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  69. Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Bar-On, N., & Ein-Dor, T. (2010). The pushes and pulls of close relationships: Attachment insecurities and relational ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 450–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Qin, L. L., Pomerantz, E. M., & Wang, Q. (2009). Are gains in decision-making autonomy during early adolescence beneficial for emotional functioning? The case of the United States and China. Child Development, 80, 1705–1721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Radloff, S. L. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rice, K. G. (1992). Separation-individuation and adjustment to college: A longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Robins, C. J., Ladd, J., Welkowitz, J., Blaney, P. H., Diaz, R., & Kutcher, G. (1994). The Personal Style Inventory: Preliminary validation studies of new measures of sociotropy and autonomy. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16, 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rummel, R. J. (1970). Applied factor analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  75. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Grolnick, W. S., & LaGuardia, J. G. (2006). The significance of autonomy and autonomy support in psychological development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 1: Theory and methods (2nd ed., pp. 795–849). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  78. Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529–565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ryan, R. M., La Guardia, J. G., Solky-Butzel, J., Chirkov, V., & Kim, Y. M. (2005). On the interpersonal regulation of emotions: Emotional reliance across gender, relationships, and cultures. Personal Relationships, 12, 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ryan, R. M., & Lynch, J. H. (1989). Emotional autonomy versus detachment: Revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood. Child Development, 60, 340–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., Delafuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88, 791–804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schönemann, P. H. (1966). A generalized solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 31, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sheldon, K. M., Houser-Marko, L., & Kasser, T. (2006). Does autonomy increase with age? Comparing the goal motivations of college students and their parents. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., & Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Shen, L. J., & Dillard, J. P. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 74–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Silverberg, S. B., & Gondoli, D. M. (1996). Autonomy in adolescence: A contextualized perspective. In G. R. Adams, R. Montemayor, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Psychosocial development during adolescence (pp. 12–61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  88. Smetana, J. G. (2000). Middle-class African American adolescents’ and parents’ conceptions of parental authority and parenting practices: A longitudinal investigation. Child Development, 71, 1672–1686.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., & Daddis, C. (2004). Longitudinal development of family decision making: Defining healthy behavioral autonomy for middle-class African American adolescents. Child Development, 75, 1418–1434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Soenens, B., & Beyers, W. (2012). The cross-cultural significance of control and autonomy in parent-adolescent relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 243–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in 3 life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Beyers, W., et al. (2007). Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: Adolescent perceptions of promotion of independence versus promotion of volitional functioning. Developmental Psychology, 43, 633–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Steinberg, L. (2002). Adolescence (6th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  94. Thorndike, E. L. (1904). An introduction to the theory of mental and social measurements. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Deci and Ryan’s self-determination theory: A view from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 312–318.Google Scholar
  97. Van Petegem, S., Beyers, W., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2012). On the association between adolescent autonomy and psychosocial functioning: Examining decisional independence from a Self-Determination Theory perspective. Developmental Psychology, 48, 76–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Niemiec, C. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: A historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. In T. Urdan & S. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, vol. 16: The decade ahead (pp. 105–166). Bradford, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  99. Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., Van Petegem, S., Wuyts, D., & Duriez, B. (2012). Longitudinal associations between adolescent perceived style of parental prohibition and oppositional defiance and internalization (under review).Google Scholar
  100. Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M. M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 468–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Weinmann, L. L. (1992). Patterns of change in middle adolescent adjustment: The role of relationships with parents and peers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 2565B–2566B.Google Scholar
  102. Youniss, J., & Smollar, J. (1985). Adolescent relations with mothers, fathers, and friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  103. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Collins, W. A. (2003). Autonomy development during adolescence. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 175–204). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  104. Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1982). Factors influencing four rules for determining the number of components to retain. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stijn Van Petegem
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maarten Vansteenkiste
    • 1
  • Wim Beyers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Developmental, Personality and Social PsychologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations