Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 41, Issue 6, pp 691–703 | Cite as

Do Peers Matter in the Development of Self-Control? Evidence from a Longitudinal Study of Youth

Empirical Research

Abstract

According to Gottfredson and Hirschi’s self-control theory, child and adolescent variation in self-control results primarily from variations in parental socialization. Although much research reveals a link between parenting and self-control, many recent studies indicate that the etiology of self-control is more complex than what has been theoretically specified. In further considering this issue, the current study first presents a theoretical model that emphasizes the role that peers may play in the development of self-control, even when accounting for the influence of parents. Next, we empirically assess the extent to which peer behavior influences self-control during childhood. The data come from a sample of U.S. families (n = 776); 48% of the subjects are male, their age was 9 years, and non-Hispanic whites represented 84% of the sample. The analysis revealed that peer behavior is significantly associated with subsequent self-control, even after accounting for differences in parental socialization, prior self-control, and other potential sources of spuriousness. The implications of the findings for theory and future research are discussed.

Keywords

Self-control Peers General theory of crime Childhood Adolescence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

All correspondence can be sent to Dr. Ryan Meldrum by e-mail to rmeldrum@fiu.edu or by mail to Dr. Ryan Meldrum, Department of Criminal Justice, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199. The Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (SECCYD) was conducted by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Early Child Care Research Network, supported by NICHD through a cooperative agreement that calls for scientific collaboration between the grantees and the NICHD staff. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development or the National Institutes of Health. (United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development: Phases I–IV, 1991–2008 [United States] [Computer files]. ICPSR21940-v1; ICPSR21941-v1; ICPSR21942-v1; ICPSR22361-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]).

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akers, R. L. (1991). Self-control as a general theory of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akers, R. L. (1998). Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and Deviance. Boston, MA: Northeastern.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beaver, K. M., Wright, J. P., & Maume, M. O. (2008). The effect of school classroom characteristics on low self-control: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Denton (Series Ed.) & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1 theory (5th edn.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Burt, C. H., Simons, R. L., & Simons, L. G. (2006). A longitudinal test of the effects of parenting and the stability of self-control: Negative evidence for the general theory of crime. Criminology, 44, 353–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chapple, C. L. (2005). Self-control, peer relations, and delinquency. Justice Quarterly, 22, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coie, J. D., & Miller-Johnson, S. (2001). Peer factors and interventions. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Child delinquents: Development, intervention, and service needs (pp. 191–210). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Cullen, F. T., Unnever, J. D., Wright, J. P., & Beaver, K. M. (2008). Parenting and self-control. In E. Goode (Ed.), Out of control: Assessing the general theory of crime (pp. 61–76). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Duckworth, A. L., & Kern, M. L. (2011). A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of self-control measures. Journal of Research in Personality (in press).Google Scholar
  13. Elliott, D. S., & Menard, S. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: Temporal and developmental patterns. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 28–67). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Elliott, D. S., Wilson, W. J., Huizinga, D., Sampson, R. J., Elliott, A., & Rankin, B. (1996). The effect of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 389–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Finkel, E. J., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2011). The effects of social relationships on self-regulation. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), The handbook of self-regulation (pp. 390–406). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gibbs, J. J., Giever, D., & Martin, J. S. (1998). Parental management and self-control: An empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 40–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibson, C. L., Sullivan, C. J., Jones, S., & Piquero, A. R. (2010). “Does it take a village?” Assessing neighborhood influences on children’s self-control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47, 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. New York: Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
  19. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hagan, J. (1991). Destiny and drift: Subcultural preferences, status attainments, and the risks and rewards of youth. American Sociological Review, 56, 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hay, C. (2001). Parenting, low self-control, and delinquency: A test of self-control theory. Criminology, 39, 707–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hay, C., & Forrest, W. (2006). The development of self-control: Examining self-control theory’s stability thesis. Criminology, 44, 739–774.Google Scholar
  23. Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, W. D. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84, 1109–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirschi, T. (2004). Self-control and crime. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 537–552). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (2001). Self-control theory. In R. Paternoster & R. Bochman (Eds.), Explaining criminals and crime: Essays in contemporary criminological theory. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  26. Lerner, R. M., & Steinberg, L. D. (2004). Handbook of adolescent psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (2001). The significance of child delinquency. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Child delinquents: Development, intervention, and service needs (pp. 1–22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Meldrum, R. C. (2008). Beyond parenting: An examination of the etiology of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 244–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meldrum, R. C., Young, J. T. N., & Weerman, F. M. (2009). Reconsidering the effect of self-control and delinquent peers: Implications of measurement for theoretical significance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miner, J. L., & Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (2008). Trajectories of externalizing behavior from age 2 to age 9: Relations with gender, temperament, ethnicity, parenting, and rater. Developmental Psychology, 44, 771–786.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescent-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muraven, M., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Self-control as a limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 774–789.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nofziger, S. (2008). The ‘cause’ of low self-control: The influence of maternal self-control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45, 191–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pedersen, S., Vitaro, F., Barker, E. D., & Borge, A. I. H. (2007). The timing of middle-childhood peer rejection and friendship: Linking early behavior to early-adolescent adjustment. Child Development, 78, 1037–1051.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perrone, D., Sullivan, C. J., Pratt, T. C., & Margaryan, S. (2004). Parental efficacy, self-control, and delinquency: A test of a general theory of crime on a nationally representative sample of youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 298–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Piquero, A. R., MacIntosh, R., & Hickman, M. (2000). Does self-control affect survey response? Applying exploratory, confirmatory, and item response theory analysis to Grasmick et al’.s self-control scale. Criminology, 38, 897–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pratt, T. C., Turner, M. G., & Piquero, A. R. (2004). Parental socialization and community context: A longitudinal analysis of the structural sources of low self-control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prinstein, M. J., & Wang, S. S. (2005). False consensus and adolescent peer contagion: Examining discrepancies between perceptions and actual reported levels of friends’ deviant and health risk behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 293–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ratchford, M., & Beaver, K. M. (2009). Neuropsychological deficits, low self-control, and delinquent involvement: Toward a biosocial explanation of delinquency. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rebellon, C. J., & Manasse, M. (2004). Do “bad boys” really get the girls? Delinquency as a cause and consequence of dating behavior among adolescents. Justice Quarterly, 21, 355–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shaw, C., & McKay, H. D. (1931). Social factors in juvenile delinquency. In Report on the cause of crime (Vol. 2). National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement, Report no. 13. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  43. Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., & Metzger, A. (2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 255–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Teasdale, B., & Silver, E. (2009). Neighborhoods and self-control: Toward an expanded view of socialization. Social Problems, 56, 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tittle, C. R., Ward, D. A., & Grasmick, H. G. (2003). Self-control and crime/deviance: Cognitive vs. behavioral measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 333–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vazsonyi, A. T., & Huang, L. (2010). Where self-control comes from: On the development of self-control and its relationship to deviance over time. Developmental Psychology, 46, 245–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vohs, K. D., & Finkel, E. J. (Eds.). (2006). Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  48. Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Weerman, F. (2011). Delinquent peers in context: A longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects. Criminology, 49, 253–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weerman, F. M., & Smeenk, W. H. (2005). Peer similarity in delinquency for different types of friends: A comparison using two different measurement methods. Criminology, 43, 499–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wright, B. R. E., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1999). Low self-control, social bonds, and crime: Social causation, social selection, or both? Criminology, 37, 479–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Young, J. T. N. (2010). How do they ‘end up together’? A social network analysis of self-control, homophily, and adolescent relationships. Journal of Quantitative Criminology Online First, August 13, 2010.Google Scholar
  53. Young, J. T. N., Barnes, J. C., Meldrum, R. C., & Weerman, F. M. (2011). Assessing and explaining misperceptions of peer delinquency. Criminology, 49, 599–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  2. 2.College of Criminology and Criminal JusticeFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations