Student Drug Testing in the Context of Positive and Negative School Climates: Results from a National Survey
- 886 Downloads
Positive school climates and student drug testing have been separately proposed as strategies to reduce student substance use in high schools. However, the effects of drug testing programs may depend on the favorability of school climates. This study examined the association between school drug testing programs and student substance use in schools with different climates. The analysis was based on a nationally representative sample of 943 high school students (48% female) ranging from 14 to 19 years of age (62% identifying as white, 18% Hispanic, 13% African American, and 7% in other categories). Results showed that both male and female students in schools with positive climates reported lower levels of personal substance use. Drug testing was associated with lower levels of personal substance use in positive school climates, but only for female students. There was no relationship between drug testing and male students’ substance use. The results are discussed in terms of the importance of considering school climates before implementing drug-testing programs in high schools.
KeywordsAdolescence Student drug testing School climate Substance use
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human subject approval statement
The Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania approved the survey.
- Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., Schulenberg, J. E., Johnston, L. D., Freedman-Doan, P., & Messersmith, E. E. (2008). The education-drug use connection: How successes and failures in school relate to adolescent smoking, drinking, drug use, and delinquency. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- CDC. (2003). Public health surveillance for behavioral risk factors in a changing environment. MMWR, 52(RR-9), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Center for Social and Emotional Education & Education Commission of the States. (2009). The school climate challenge, narrowing the gap between school climate research and school climate policy, practice guidelines and teacher education policy. New York, NY: Center for Social and Emotional Education and Education Commission of the States. http://www.schoolclimate.org/climate/documents/school-climate-challenge.pdf
- Faggiano, F., Vigna-Taglianti, F. D., Versino, E., Zambon, A., Borraccino, A., & Lemma, P. (2005). School-based prevention for illicit drugs use. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2(CD003020).Google Scholar
- Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Giordono, P., & Cernkovich, S. (1997). Gender and antisocial behavior. In D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling, & J. Maser (Eds.), The handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 496–510). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, L., Elliot, D. L., MacKinnon, D. P., Moe, E. L., Kuehl, K. S., Yoon, M., et al. (2007). Outcomes of a prospective trial of student-athlete drug testing: The student athlete testing using random notification (SATURN) study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(5), 421–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goldberg, L., Elliot, D. L., MacKinnon, D., Moe, E. K., Nohre, L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2003). Drug testing to prevent substance abuse: Background and pilot study results of SATURN student athlete testing using random notification) study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32(1), 16–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hansen, W., & Dusenbury, L. (2004). Alcohol use and misuse: Prevention strategies with minors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Harrison, L. D., Martin, S. S., Enev, T., & Harrington, D. (2007). Comparing drug testing and self-report of drug use among youths and young adults in the general population. Rockville, MD: Substance Use and Mental Health Service Administration, Office of Applied Studies.Google Scholar
- Hingson, R., & Kenkel, D. (2004). Social, health, and economic consequences of underage drinking. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Jessor, R., Donovan, J. E., & Costa, F. M. (1991). Beyond adolescence: Problem behaviour and young adult development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2008). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2007 (Vol. I): Secondary school students. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
- Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2011). Monitoring the future: National results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2010. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan. http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/mtf-overview2010.pdf.
- Kern, J., Gunja, F., Cox, A., Rosenbaum, M., Appel, J., & Verma, A. (2006). Making sense of student drug testing, why educators are saying no. New York, NY: Drug Policy Alliance. http://www.aclu.org/FilesPDFs/makingsensesdt.pdf.
- LaRusso, M. D., & Selman, R. L. (2003). The influence of development and school atmosphere on adolescents’ perceptions of risk and prevention: Cynicism and skepticism. In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated strategy (pp. 113–122). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- McKeganey, N. (2005). Random drug-testing of schoolchildren. A shot in the arm or a shot in the foot for drug prevention? York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. http://www.drugslibrary.stir.ac.uk/documents/randomtest.pdf.
- National Highway Traffic Safety Agency. (2008). 2007 traffic safety annual assessment-alcohol-impaired driving fatalities. Washington, DC. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pubs/811016.pdf.
- National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2009). Tobacco addiction. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. http://www.nida.nih.gov/PDF/TobaccoRRS_v16.pdf.
- National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2010). Marijuana abuse. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. http://www.drugabuse.gov/PDF/RRMarijuana.pdf.
- ONDCP. (2002). What you need to know about drug testing in schools. Washington DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy, Drug Policy Information Clearing House. http://www.ncjrs.gov/ondcppubs/publications/pdf/drug_testing.pdf.
- SHPPS. (2006). SHPPS 2006 data files and documentation: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Adolescent and School Health. http://www.cdc.gov/healthyYouth/shpps/2006/data/school.htm, Accessed September 21, 2001.
- Thomas, R., & Perera, R. (2006). School-based programmes for preventing smoking. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3(CD001293).Google Scholar
- United States Supreme Court. (1995). Vernonia school district no. 47 vs. Action.Google Scholar
- United States Supreme Court. (2002). Board of education of independent school district no. 92 of Pottawatomie County vs. Earls.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2004). The health consequences of smoking: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health. http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/2004/complete_report/index.htm.
- Yu, C.-Y., & Muthén, B. (2002). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles, Graduate School of Education & Information.Google Scholar